Document information
Physical location:
RB MSS M198, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 93.04.02Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Otto Tepper, 1893-04-02. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/93-04-02>, accessed September 11, 2025
1
MS annotation by Tepper: Reply 6.4.93'. Letter not found.
Privat
Bin ganz gerührt von der wissenschaftlichen Anhänglichkeit, welche Sie mir bewahren,
u bin Ihnen auch besonders dankbar für die bestimmte u energische practische Weise
in welcher Sie für meine Interessen in der Flora-Australiens eingetreten sind, wie
es ja auch der brave Hr Holtze thut. Es war richtig, dass Sie B. prompt aufforderten,
nachdem er mich hinterlistig aus der Flor. Austral. zu drängen versucht, sein Circular
zurückzuziehen. Aber ich glaube nicht, dass er es auf eine Privat-Forderung thun wird.
Wenn die Royal Society von S.A. einen
Protest
in öffentlicher Sitzung gegen sein Eindringen auf mich und meine wissenschaft. Rechte
auspräche, würde er doch vielleicht noch von seinem Vorhaben abstehen. Er sollte auch
aufgefordert werden, die Namen der Botaniker in den anderen Colonien zu nennen, welche
sich an ihn
freiwillig
gewandt, die Flora fortzusetzen. Diese Assertion ist eine Beleidigung für Sie u viele
Andere.
Dankbar Ihr
Ferd. von Mueller.
Ich habe die ganzen Oster-Feiertage durchzuarbeiten, um die Distele Publication für
das Agricultur Departement fertig zu machen. Es freut mich sehr, dass auch Tate mich
vertheidigt.
Easter 93
2
In 1893, Easter fell on 2 April.
Private
I am quite touched by the scientific loyalty that you show me and I am also particularly
thankful for the determined and energetic practical manner in which you have stood
up for my interests in the Flora australiensis, just as the worthy Mr Holtze also has done. It was proper that you promptly asked
B.
to withdraw his circular
after he treacherously tried to push me out of the Flora australiensis. However, I do not think that he will do it on a private request. If the Royal Society
of South Australia would express a
protest
in a public meeting against his intrusion on me and my scientific rights, he would
perhaps then abandon his plan.
He should also be asked to name the names of the botanists in the other colonies
who voluntarily turned to him to continue the Flora. This assertion is an insult to you and many others.
3
i.e. F. M. Bailey.
4
Bailey's circular, dated 16 March 1893, announcing his intention of issuing a supplement
to the Flora australiensis (i.e. Bentham (1863-78)) was published in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, vol. 9, p. 15. Bailey sent M a typescript copy, received by M on 20 March 1893,
which he then forwarded to Joseph Hooker; see Circular, March 1893 (in this edition
as 93-03-00b), and M to J. Hooker, 28 March 1893. The April 1893 issue of the Victorian naturalist included (pp. 183-4) an announcement welcoming M's plan to issue his own supplementary
volume.
5
The Society did express such a protest; see M to O. Tepper, 9 April 1893 (in this
edition as 93-04-09a).
Gratefully your
Ferd. von Mueller.
I have worked through the whole Easter holidays to get the thistle publication ready
for the Agriculture Department.
I am very pleased that Tate also defends me.
6
B93.07.05.