Document information
Physical location:
88.02.14aPreferred Citation:
Augustus Mueller to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1888-02-14 [88.02.14a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/88-02-14a>, accessed September 10, 2025
1
Letter not found. For the text given here, see A. Mueller (1888a).The printed version
is headed: ‘Ueber die Behandlung des Schlangenbisses durch Strychnin. | Von Dr. A. Müller zu Yackandandah (Nordwestliches Victoria, Australien). | Briefliche
Mittheilung an Baron Ferd. v. Müller in Melbourne.’ [On the treatment of snakebite with strychnine. By Dr A. Müller at Yackandandah (Northwestern
Victoria, Australia). Communicated in a letter to Baron Ferd. v. Müller in Melbourne.]
Yackandandah is in northeastern Victoria.
14. Februar 1888.
Permit me to express my warmest thanks to you for your kind letter
and the endorsement contained in it of my treatment of snakebite. My discovery of
strychnine as a reliable antidote for snakebite was not accidental, but resulted from
careful observation of the process of poisoning that gave me the strong conviction
that the poison had a specific action on all the central parts of the nervous system
producing and regulating muscle action and movement. Because this action is in no
way restricted to the voluntary muscles but seems to extend to all contractile fibres,
as is shown among other things in the paralysis of the pupils and the very weak action
of the heart, strychnine offered itself particularly as an antidote, because it shows
a directly opposing influence on the muscle system in its well-known toxic action.
Had strychnine failed me, I would even have tried brucine, so strongly convinced was
I of the necessity of a similar remedy. Strychnine, however, is completely a match
for the snake poison and will undoubtedly prove itself reliable even in India and
thereby save a host of people's lives annually, whilst a very welcome pecuniary independence
for his old age is assured for the fortunate discover, coupled with the blessed knowledge
of having rendered a lasting service to mankind. I will take the liberty of sending
Dr King a small paper about the matter, which I intend to read before the Medical
Society in Melbourne next month,
and at the same time ask him to secure me the reward offered by the Indian Government,
if the remedy proves just as reliable in Asia as it is in Australia. To judge from
the symptoms, the action in India is the same, only more intensive, and therefore
it will probably need larger doses of the antidote.
2
Letter not found.
3
The report published in the Australian medical journal, 1888, pp. 103-10 of the next meeting of the Medical Society of Victoria, held on
7 March 1888, makes no mention of Mueller’s having presented a paper. It was read
at the meeting of 2 May 1888 and published as A. Mueller (1888). See also M to A.
Engler, 5 April 1888, and notes thereto.
14 February 1888.