The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: 14/7/65 ¶ ¶ Your kind letter of 25/4 dear Mr Bentham, did not arrive in time to be answered by last months mail It is my intention to send you soon all the Compositae, a very extensive, beautiful & i...

Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, ff. 169, 6. 65.07.14

Plant names

Compositae
Search for Compositae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eucalyptus
Search for Eucalyptus in
Kennedya
Search for Kennedya in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Myrtaceae
Search for Myrtaceae in
Olearia
Search for Olearia in
Streptosia
Search for Streptosia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1865-07-14. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1865/65-07-14-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

14/7/65

Your kind letter of 25/4 dear Mr Bentham, did not arrive in time to be answered by last months mail It is my intention to send you soon all the , a very extensive, beautiful & instructive collection. I will work on a few genera, e.g. before they are finally despatched. I had much to withdraw my attention from plants of late.

M was acting for the Ladies' Leichhardt Committee in arranging the Leichhardt Search Expedition (see agreement between D. McIntrye and M, 20 July 1865); see also Brown-May & Maroske (1994) for a discussion of an engagement to Rebecca Nordt.

Still I managed to render some novelties known from N. E. Australia. After all the influx of new plants is very sparing & I doubt, whether all Australia will yield more than 500 plant[s] additional to what we know already. You desire me to continue my work on Victorian plants. In truth I have no courage & spirit to do so, for the greatest part of interest is withdrawn from it by the appearance of the flor. Australiens.

M had communicated similar unhappiness to his correspondents, who informed the Hookers. For Henry Barkly, see notes to M to J. Hooker, 24 October 1864 (in this edition as 64-10-25a). George Thwaites reported 'Mueller, from his letters to me, appears to be in a very unhappy state of mind. He seems to think he has lost importance and influence as a scientific man from having allowed another person to undertake the Australian Flora. If his name could appear with Bentham's on the title page, it might make poor Mueller satisfied. Do not take any notice of my having written this, when you are corresponding with Mueller, as he might be angry with me for interfering.' (G. Thwaites to J. Hooker, 28 March 1865, RBG Kew, Directors' correspondence, vol. 162, f 330.)

Thwaites had apparently not seen a copy of the first two published volumes of Bentham (1863-78). The title pages of all volumes had M's name as agreed with Bentham before work began; see G. Bentham to M, 15 October 1861 and M to G. Bentham, 24 December 1861.

I have lately devoted more time to my ordinary original profession & have felt so disheartened that once I was at the eve of giving up Botany althogether. Were I few years younger & had I not made such immense sacrifices for it, I certainly should turn my attention to something else. — Under any circumstance[s] I will assist & continue to assist in your work & should I be away at any time collections shall still be sent to you as before and the Gov. subsidy be continued

The text on f. 169 ends here, at the bottom of the sheet. The remaining text is filed as f. 6 of RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70. It is placed here on the basis that Bentham annotated the fragment in a way consistent with the comments upon the proposed genus in G. Bentham to M, 18 October 1865; MS annotation by Bentham: ' or Hilleana = Strongylodon ruber'.

I send a few by this mail, including 2 apparently well-marked Eucalypti, which I described for the 33 fasc of the Fragmenta.

B65.07.03; E. spectabalis, p. 45; E. orbifolia, p. 50.

I send also the only specimen of a beautiful redflowered climber of a genus near , which if new might be called .

Perhaps you have still time to introduce it into the genera plantarum.

Bentham & Hooker (1862-83). Bentham was working on the Leguminoseae, to which belongs, for vol. 1, part 2, pp 434–600. That part was published on 19 October 1865 (Stearn (1956)).

Regardfully

your

Ferd Mueller