Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol. LXXIV, Australia letters 1851-8, letter no. 167. 57.08.10a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to William Hooker, 1857-08-10 [57.08.10a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/57-08-10a>, accessed May 18, 2024

1
For an edited version of this letter see B58.07.01. The changes in the printed version noted here are those that alter sense, or the spelling of plant and place names. Uncertain transcriptions follow the printed version.
Melbourne bot Garden, 10. Aug 1857.
My dear Sir William.
No European mail having arrived since the despatch of my July letters, I have but little to communicate. Even little botanically, for the last month has for the greater part been employed in active duties on the botanic garden. I found however time of working a little on orchids, and beg to forward in this letter a few specimens and notes. I directed them to Professor Lindley, who probably will possess greater facilities for making use of them, and should feel delighted to see my views about the distinctiveness of as a genus confirmed.
2
J. Lindley, in an undated letter to W. Hooker wrote, 'I have not yet thanked you for Muellers little Parcel. His new irrit[…] Orchid seems to be properly new — the others I have not examd — Do you wish for his notes for the Journal of Botany or for any other purpose. If you do I will put the notes into shape.' (RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol XXXVII [English letters 1857], letter no. 364 [probably November 1857 according to the sequence of letters in the vol.]).
I reviewed also the salsolaceous plants of the northern Expedition along with others of former collections, and have now for the first time elaborated the characters of several genera and many species, which were transmitted to you many years ago. The most interesting of these plants seems to me a second species of Dysphania, quite unlike in habit to its congener and indeed I think to all .
, erecta. pumila, subglanduloso puberula, foliis ovatis oblongisve,
3
printed version has v. oblongis.
glomerulis in spicas cylindraceas terminalis aphyllas dense collectis,
4
printed version has congestis.
calycis laciniis dorso valde inflatis glabris margine subtilissime ciliolatis, fructiferis diu cohaerentibus cum caryopside[,] laevi fusca nitente ovata secedentibus,
Ad rivum Sturts Creek
Australiae subcentralis
5
Dysphania ... subcentralis is a footnote in the MS with its position in the text indicated by an asterisk.
At the close of the last mail, my requisition for European plants was not prepared.
6
See M to W. Hooker, August 1857.
I take the liberty of enclosing it now, praying that you Sir William, will have the great kindness of forwarding it to such a nurseryman, as is likely to execute it best; I shall in all probability be able to purchase a large number of plants henceforth every year, and look forward with much interest to the new connection thus originating with th[e]
7
editorial addition — obscured by the binding strip.
establishment. Of such plants, enumerated in the list, as will readily be prepared from seeds, I do of course not expect living plants, altho' I did not furnish separate lists for seeds. Ornamental evergreen trees and useful plants is what this establishment at present requires. I am laying several acres of ground now out for an systematical arrangement and shall endeavour to obtain next year a sufficiency of various coniferous trees for transforming the Yarra-declivities of this garden int[o] a pinetum.
Our collector has returned from Wilsons promontory,
8
John Watters. See M to F. McCoy, 1 August 1857.
and a collection of woods and of living plants will be forwarded to you, as soon as the former are dry and the latter established.
With expressions of sincere regard I remain,
my dear Sir William,
obediently yours
Ferd. Mueller