Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras, ff. 108–9. 93.05.31
Plant names
-
Fagus Moorei
Search for
Fagus Moorei
in
Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Frederick Bailey, 1893-05-31. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/93-05-31>, accessed April 20, 2025
1
MS is stamped: 'Royal Gardens Kew 10. Jul. 93'.
2
The copy, marked by the copyist, 'F. M. Bailey F.L.S Colonial Botanist for Queensland',
was enclosed with M to W. Thiselton-Dyer, 31 May 1893 (in this edition as 93-05-31a). M's corrections have been incorporated into the transcription.
Melbourne, 31st May 1893
Sir
in reply to your letter of the 25th inst.
I have the honor to inform you that
was discovered some time ago by Mr R. Collins on high mountains towards Jamaroocau,
where it seems to occur only in one spot, and it is easily comprehended, that this
discovery would interest the Natural History Society of Brisbane, to which I also
belong. Had the finding of this tree in Q.L
been of any entomologic importance such would of course have been explained at the
recent meeting of the Society.
3
F. Bailey to M, 25 May 1893.
Fagus Moorei
Search for Fagus Moorei
in
4
Not identified. Possibly the copyist's error?
5
Qld.
6
Bailey in his letter had noted that a Brisbane newspaper had reported M's sending
a specimen to the Entomologist of the Queensland Museum, and requested that M give
Bailey details of the locality.
In reference to a circular in type writing,
sent several weeks ago by you without letter or further explanation to me just like
to some others, announcing suddenly and unexpectedly your intention to supplement
the Flora Australiensis
“you are fully aware of my desire to keep published up to date an account of all
the plants of Australia”,
with the final view of my completing that work, and you must also know well enough
that I have been almost daily making exertions for this purpose ever since the succesive
volumes of Flora appeared and that Bentham himself publicly desired that additions
should be brought up connectedly If any one should compile from my “Fragmenta” and
other literary property of mine, outside what pertains to the colony in which he is
officially engaged, it will be against my rights and against my permission, as such
an act would inflict injuries on my status and department. My explorations have been
variously and extensively carried on
in all
the Australian colonies since 1847, not like yours merely in one and only in much
more recent times. Furthermore solely in my collections are the needful materials
for a full elucidation the universal vegetation of Australia. I would however beg
to advise that as early as possible a
full
flora of Queensland be written; and remains surprising that by far the largest portion
of its territory has never yet been botanically traversed, notwithstanding the facilities
long ere this offered by through railways, coaches and steamers existing widely through
the colony for a number of years.
7
M sent a copy of Bailey’s circular with M to J. Hooker, 28 March 1893; there is another copy at Kew in RBG Kew, Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras, f. 99.
8
Bentham (1863-78).
9
M is quoting F. Bailey to M, 25 May 1893, where Bailey uses the wording to refer to himself.
I have the honor to be
Sir
Your obedient servant
(signed) Ferd. von Mueller
Govt. Botanist for Victoria