Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1882-90, ff. 309-12. 90.02.21

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to William Thiselton-Dyer, 1890-02-21. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/90-02-21>, accessed September 11, 2025

1
Date stamped on ff 309 and 311: Royal Gardens Kew 3.Apr. 90, and annotated by Thiselton-Dyer on f 309: And 13.7. 90. (letter not found).
21/2/90.
Private
Two days ago, dear Mr Dyer,
2
See M to W. Thiselton-Dyer, 19 February 1890.
I wrote to you a private letter hurriedly in reply to your last one,
3
Letter not found.
touching my present relation to Mr Bailey. Before the subject passes from my memory, I like to make a few additional remarks. There is nothing to hinder Mr Bailey to continue communicating with me, if he likes to do so .
I have made an object of life, to elaborate the flora of Australia. I have set on it and on kindred pursuits all I had, which I could not have done, had I established a domestic home. The researches on vascular plants ought in my lifetime to be kept together here; but he not only wishes to create an imperium in imperio ,
4
empire within an empire.
but seemingly also an institution in opposition, and his tactics are calculated to weaken my establishment and I have nothing else in the whole world.
I am still willing to do anything for him in reason . But there seems to be more than one person jealous of me in Brisbane. I went so far formerly, to allow him to share in authorities for plants,
5
For example, Bauhinia gilesii in B82.07.04, p. 151, and Elaeocarpus bancroftii in B86.06.02, p. 142; see also below.
when he not even had fixed the genus! He over-rates much his knowledge, which will ever remain very defective from many causes. The causa belli on his part seems to be, that I did not recognize all his plants as new, and that I did not insert the last lot in the Census.
6
B89.12.03.
I had to omit my own supplemen[t] with many additional species including .
7
I had to … vaginalis written in central margin of f. 310, front, with intended position marked by asterisks.
But I was ovewhelmed with extrawork for the Austral. Assoc,
8
M was President of the second congress of the Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Melbourne in January 1890.
quite irrespective of writing the adress
9
B90.13.01.
and the essay on Sir W. MacGregors plants
10
B89.13.11. quite irrespective … plants, is written in left hand margin of f. 301, back, with intended position indicated by asterisks.
and I had not any money left to extend the print, being obliged on that ground to leave out even the preface , nor had I time to go into new calculations for the Census after additions, which I should have been obliged to take merely from his prints , to be in time, without vericifacation[.] from subsequently received specimens
11
from … specimens interlined.
I corrected his "veni ficum" into veneni ficum;
12
M is correcting Bailey’s Latin; the article by Bailey that uses it has not been found.
I gave him some names as late as November
13
i.e. too late to be included in B89.12.03.
of plants which he could not make out even for orders (e.g. ,
14
In Bailey (1890), p. 12, Hyptiandra bidwillii var. grandiuscula is named under the joint authority of 'Bail. and F.v.M.'
— for all of this he has not a word of thanks!
15
Bailey (1889), p. 35 has the footnote: 'The few plants marked with an asterisk, I obtained but poor specimens of, but Baron Mueller has kindly assisted me in their determination. The descriptions in all cases, however, are my own.'
I sent him also lately a goodish parcel of New Guinea plants, the essay on Sir Will Macgregors plants [&c], which he does not think worth even of acknowledging as received!
As regards the Garden here, I trust, you will bear in remembrance, that £150,000 (Not £50000) have been spent on it since I left, quite irrespective of lately an enormous sum for water supply, and some few years ago large extras for buildings earthworks &c, while I in latest years was almost starved out. The obligations, which I all along had, to distribute vast numbers of trees &c, have since I left devolved on a special institution, the State Nursery of plants at Mt Macedon for which there is an ample vote quite irrespective of the bot. Garden.
16
for which … Garden written in right margin of f. 311, front.
How far science and industries have benefitted from such lavish expenditure here, you can judge for yourself independently.
I am now trying to push culture into the Australian Alps, the whole as yet unsettled, though comprising an area nearly half as large as Switzerland!
17
M alluded to the Alps, where 'pasture- and orchard-plots will soon be the homes of many new highlanders', in his opening address to the Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science in January 1890 (B90.13.01, pp. 20-21); he was eventually asked to prepare a briefing note for the Government; see M to A. McLean, 10 December 1890.
Regardfully yours
always
Ferd. von Mueller
Phytography is in my Department a mere byework; rural and industrial obligations take up in a young colony the maintime of a Department like mine.
Do not think me small-minded; but I must protect the interests of a public Department, and have thus explained this at length , as the question was raised by yourself , and as you evidently were under wrong impressions. I do not wish, to enter further on any explanations of this subject; so kindly allow the matter to drop now.
He ventured, what I could have done long ago, to decribe a without flowers or fruit.
18
Bambusa Moreheadiana, Bailey (1889), p. 71. Bailey in his notes to the description wrote 'Baron von Mueller … 1886, drew attention to a Queensland species of Bambusa, but the specimens and collector's notes he thought insufficient to name the species; and even now, not having seen the inflorescence, by some it may be deemed too early to have given it a specific distinction, but the uncertainty of the flowering of plants of this genus, and that the stems are being put to many useful purposes is, I consider, sufficient excuse.' See M to M. Holtze, 12 December 1886, and B86.12.01, where M mentions receiving from 'Mr. Pentzke' [i.e. Pentzcke] specimens of a probable bamboo, without fruit or flowers, from the Daintree River area.
Such plants I do not feel justified to record.
19
The final paragraph is written on the left and right margins of f. 309, front, i.e. alongside the first paragraph of the letter.