21/2/90.
Private
Two days ago, dear Mr Dyer,
I wrote to you a private letter hurriedly in reply to your last one,
touching my present relation to Mr Bailey. Before the subject passes from my memory,
I like to make a few additional remarks. There is
nothing
to
hinder
Mr
Bailey to
continue
communicating with me, if
he likes to do so
.
I have made an object of life, to elaborate the flora of Australia. I have set on
it and on kindred pursuits
all
I had, which I could not have done, had I established a domestic home. The researches
on vascular plants ought in my
lifetime
to be kept together here; but he not only wishes to create an
imperium in imperio
,
but seemingly also an institution in opposition, and his tactics are calculated to
weaken
my establishment
and I have nothing else in the whole world.
I am still willing to do anything for him in
reason
. But there seems to be more than one person jealous of me in Brisbane. I went so
far formerly, to allow him to share in authorities for plants,
when he not even had fixed the genus! He
over-rates
much his knowledge, which will ever remain very defective from many causes. The
causa belli
on his part seems to be, that I did not recognize all his plants as new, and that
I did not insert the last lot in the Census.
I had to omit my own supplemen[t] with many additional species including
.
But I was ovewhelmed with extrawork for the Austral. Assoc,
quite irrespective of writing the adress
and the essay on Sir W. MacGregors plants
and I had
not
any
money
left to extend the print, being obliged on that ground to
leave out even the preface
, nor had I time to go into new calculations for the Census after additions, which
I should have been obliged to take merely from his
prints
, to be in time, without vericifacation[.] from
subsequently
received specimens
I corrected his "veni ficum" into veneni ficum;
I gave him some names as late as
November
of plants which he
could not make out
even for orders (e.g.
,
— for all of this he has not a
word
of thanks!
I sent him also lately a goodish parcel of New Guinea plants, the essay on Sir Will
Macgregors plants [&c], which he does
not
think worth even of acknowledging as received!
As regards the Garden here, I trust, you will bear in remembrance, that
£150,000
(Not £50000) have been spent on it since I left, quite irrespective of lately an
enormous sum for water supply, and some few years ago large extras for buildings earthworks
&c, while I in latest years was almost starved out. The obligations, which I all along
had, to distribute vast numbers of trees &c, have since I left devolved on a special
institution, the State Nursery of plants at Mt Macedon for which there is an ample
vote quite irrespective of the bot. Garden.
How far
science
and industries have benefitted from such lavish expenditure here,
you
can judge for yourself independently.
I am now trying to push culture into the Australian Alps, the whole as yet unsettled,
though comprising an area nearly half as large as Switzerland!
Regardfully yours
always
Ferd. von Mueller
Phytography is in my Department a mere byework; rural and industrial obligations take
up in a young colony the maintime of a Department like mine.
Do not think me small-minded; but I must protect the interests of a public Department,
and have thus explained this at
length
, as the question was raised by
yourself
, and as you evidently were under wrong impressions. I do
not
wish, to enter further on any explanations of this subject; so kindly allow the matter
to drop now.
He ventured, what I could have done long ago, to decribe a
without flowers or fruit.
Such plants I do not feel justified to record.