Document information
Physical location:
P84/759, unit 22, VPRS 1163/P1 inward correspondence, VA 1123 Premier, Public Record Office, Victoria. 84.04.03Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Thomas Wilson, 1884-04-03. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/84-04-03>, accessed April 20, 2025
1
This letter was first registered as B84/3072 in the Chief Secretary's Department then
referred to the Premier. See also T. Wilson to M, 2 April 1884, and M to G. Berry, 2 July 1884.
3. April 1884.
T. R. Wilson Esqr,
Under Secretary.
Sir.
In accordance with the request, made by you in memorandum 1098, I have the honor to
submit the original letter, received from his Excellency Dr von Regel, Director of
the botanic Garden of St Petersburg, on arrival of the Giant-Todea, sent on behalf
of the Victorian Government by me to the St. Petersburg horticultural Exhibition.
I further forward a literal translation of that letter. I regret however, that I
cannot furnish a copy of the letter, in which I announced to Dr von Regel, that I
had chosen a huge Todea for exemplification of the Victorian vegetable resources at
the St. Petersburg Exhibition. This inability of furnishing a copy of the letter is
readily explained by the fact, that none of my correspondence with great men of science
since 30 years, is copied, nor do I ever get letters which have been copied from Sir
Joseph Hooker, Dr von Regel or others, our correspondence counting by thousands of
letters a year. But I beg to send a transcript from the Departmental letter-book of
the letter of advise, which accompanied the Todea or announced its shipment to Mess.
Watson & Scull, which is a full and permanent record departmentally of this sending.
I add a late letter from Sir Joseph Hooker,
by which it will be seen, that like Dr Regel's it is not copied, at least I do not
think so; a passage from Sir Joseph's letter, referring to a suggestion of his in
reference to the exploration of New Guinea and the New Hebrides from Australia may
interest the Government here particularly.
2
See E. Regel to M, 14 June 1883.
3
J. Hooker to M, 17 January 1884.
From the letter of Dr von Regel it will be seen, that the thanks of the Russian Government
to that of Victoria will be conveyed; and if this perhaps has not yet been done, it
must be because, the St Petersburg horticultural Exhibition was postponed til May
1884, through the Coronation of H. M. the Czar having taken place in May 1883. That
I endeavour, to give due praise to the liberality of the Victorian Government will
be seen from Dr v. Regel's letter, and in further support of this I add a cut from
the "Sydney Mail", in which I had lately to refer to some medical questions concerning
Eucalypts.
Finally I beg to add a memorandum, which sets forth how the whole sending of the
Todea to St Petersburg arose.
4
See M to the Editor of the Sydney mail, March 1884 (in this edition as 84-03-00).
5
M to T. Wilson, 18 March 1884 (in this edition as 84-03-18b).
I have the honor to be,
Sir, your obedient servant
Ferd. von Mueller.
6
Wilson forwarded M's letter to E. Thomas, Secretary to the Premier, on 7 April 1884.
On 30 April, the Premier, J. Service, deliberated: 'I regret to say that there are
serious irregularities in this matter to which I must request the attention of the
Hon. the Chief Secretary. 1. This presentation has been made by the Gov. Botanist
to the Russian Govt without the slightest authorisation by the Vicn Govt. 2. The Govt
has been, entirely without its consent, made a party to a mutual arrangement for the
sharing of the cost between the Govt & the Baron von Mueller. I consider this an undignified
position for the Govt to occupy at any rate one in which it should not have been placed
without being consulted. 3. But this present, costing to the Govt £32.15.0 is acknowledged
in the Despatch as the present of Baron von Mueller. Now this must either be a misapprehension,
or else Baron von Mueller has presented as his own gift what was really Govt property.
To settle this point I applied for a copy of the letter under which the presentation
was made. The Government Botanist however is unable to produce a copy, and must therefore
be held responsible for the form in which the acknowledgement is made. The circumstance
that a copy of the letter making the presentation is not on record is itself confirmation
— as, if the present had been made officially on behalf of this Govt, a copy of the
letter should of course be on record. I would suggest to the Honorable the Chief Secretary,
that the Govt Botanist should be informed that the Government entirely disapprove
of his action in this matter. The incident confirms the propriety of the Circular
issued in last June requesting that all official presentations should be made through
the Premier.'
On 5 May 1884 Wilson informed Thomas that he had been directed to reply that: 'the
attention of the Government Botanist has already been drawn to the impropriety and
irregularity of the course he took in this matter'. Thomas replied on 14 May that
he had been directed to state that: 'what is dealt with is merely the irregularity
of incurring expenditure without authority. The subsequent correspondence has brought
to light these further points, namely:— 1. Presenting to the Russian Govt, the property
of the Victorian Govt without any authority. 2. Presenting it as
his own gift
notwithstanding that it was paid for out of Govt Funds. 3. Communicating with the
Russian Govt otherwise than through the Head of his own Govt. 4. Making the Govt a
party, without its consent, to a mutual arrangement by which the Govt is put in quite
a subordinate position to himself. As however the Premier's Circular on the subject
of Presentations will probably prevent such a transaction in future, Mr Service does
not desire to pursue this matter further if the Hon. the Chief Secretary thinks it
better not to do so.'
The Chief Secretary, G. Berry, added to Wilson: 'Request the Govt Botanist to call
on me say Monday next between 10am & noon'. Wilson duly noted that M saw Berry on
17 May. (P84/1152, unit 22, VPRS 1163/P1, PROV).