Private
Newyear,
1881
In first instance, dear Mr Dyer, let me offer my felicitation to the new year; may
it be to you and your family one of health and happiness. Next let me in justice remark,
that some few grains of the first lot sown at a friends place of the Pannicum
seeds from tropical Africa have germinated; so among the flowers are also a few seedgrains,
and we will be able to add thus this species to the rural flora of Australia. On
careful examination I find however, that these flowers (and seeds) do not respond
to the description of
. Possibly the Negros comprehend several species of Pannicum under the appellation
Coapim. It will be well worth while for Kew, to follow up this matter more fully.
As I have occasion thus to write to you, I must send you some reply to your letter
of the 15 September,
as evidently you have no clear idea about my official position here, such as it is
now.
Whoever may be the distinguished "Statesman" with whom you are befriended or acquainted;
I must say, that in extra-political matters such as science he evinces a singular
want of competency of judgement, that is to say, if he endorses the dictum, that my
scientific position was merely maintained out of consideration to myself or some similar
ideas enunciated by him. Of course we can stop at any time the phytographic work,
of which Victoria was rather proud, and let other colonies get the adscendency. But
that from a Victorian does not evince enlightened statesmanship and every high minded
man should set himself against such crude notions. Selwyn was driven out of Victoria
to Canada, where he is now glorified, while the geologic work of our colony here was
stopped.
Why does Britain not follow the example?! — according to such ideas.
You refer to the monetary question; that throughout has had no consideration with
me, as regards salary. What I had as income & private property I have cheerfully spent
on my bot. service, but a salary represents only a small fraction of departmental
endowment, of which at the slightest reflection you will be cognisant at Kew. Nominally
my salary may be equal to that of such illustrious men as Owen, Hooker & Huxley. But
who in the whole world would compare a Victorian emolument to one in Britain? The
most ordinary vitals may in retail be cheaper here than in England, but rent and nearly
everything else is so very much dearer, that it is useless to institute comparisons
of this kind; this would however say, that the positions of your leading men of science
are monetary much undervalued. In my own case remember, that I have not even an office
room left, and that for a series of years £120 annually had to be paid out of my Salary
for office rent!
Do me the justice to spend a holiday in reading my Directors Reports on the garden
from 1857-1869;
you will not regret having read them and you will then see how helpless I am now
for that work, which the Colonists ask from me, whether investigations on Phylloxera,
or Oidium, whether tests of growth of trees or the applicability of their timber; whether jurors
work at Exhibitions or to prepare articles of vegetable sources for them, whether
the introduction of new fodder plants or their chemical analysis &c &c. Say at any
rate
one
kind word of sympathy, such as your regret[,] that even my laboratory was pulled
down and my apparatus taken from me, when the whole administration of the Laboratory
even in this expensive city cost only £150 annually. — Certainly, merely for descriptive
botany no Government in the world would keep up any Department; hence I am forced
to bring out
utilitarian
works mainly for the colonists and have little opportunity to advance even the Australian
flora by new researches, being since I left the garden even unable to keep a collector
in the field and required like you to work for purposes of practical handicraft with
this wide difference to others: =
without a Department
, worthy of such a name, and left behind helpless in the race even with the other
Austral. colonies.
You are mistaken, my dear Mr Dyer, when you say my present position was created for
me when I left the Garden. It was created by Latrobe in 1852
in
the garden; outside of it, it has no meaning of reasonable extent. Why was I driven
out of the garden, the
richest
in plants in these southern colonies in my time and the largest in extent? with about
20 buildings of one sort or the other to which out of £90000 since I left only 2 have
been added because I resisted vulgar intrusion of ignorant so called "landscape gardeners"
on my position, whose proper provinces were the well endowed parks & reserves of great
extent under the Government around Melbourne. Moreover I was enveyed of the treasures,
brought together by myself in half a life's toil, shameless assailed by a misled press
by traducers, who wanted a sinecure, while under the rigor of the Civil services I
could not defend myself, and then I was methodically so reduced in the garden-vote,
that on dry silurian clayslate over 300 acres and without means for irrigation and
the most scanty supply of hand watering only I could not make green lawns or keep
them, and had no money to grow flowers on a more extensive scale than I did, though
all bazaar & church-festivals & tea-meeting had baskets or even cartloads full after
all. This has
ceased
since I left; so the growing of hundreds of thousands of trees, which as pines &c
are now towering up at every town and village in Victoria on cemeteries, ecclesiastic
& educational buildings of this young land of mere Eucalypts.
How am I to shake off my responsibilities for Exhibitions? Here I am for many weeks
as a professional expert among the jurors, without adequate means to do justice to
such position by independent tests, though of course I can refer to my library, such
as it is, and which I have no means to keep even approximately complete for my purposes.
New colonies want new cultures and new industries; they do not care for strictly botanical
books. I have fully explained this in the long address, which I was
forced
to deliver at the opening of the section for Agriculture, Horticulture and pastoral
pursuits at our Social Science congress in connection with the present international
exhibition.
How could you for a moment compare my position to Benthams! He is independent as a
rich man, while I must from year to year
earn
my Salary, which is
not safe
, if I cannot do
substantial
good for the colonies. Bentham need not keep up an official correspondence of 2000
or 3000 letters a year, nor has he any responsibilities whatever. But more! What has
made Bentham great? Kew! Princely endowed Kew! Without Kew garden there would have
been no Kew Herbarium; without Kew Herbarium there would not be a Bentham of such
high fame; without Kew Garden & thereby Kew herbarium Bentham would not have done
half the work he did. The Gov Botanist of Britain has his position as an effective
one in Kew Garden, not even in the British Museum. You say [esteem]ed Sir, I should
establish a botanical Institute for all Australia! How? The jealousies of the other
colonies would forbid to bear their share of the expenditure. None of the Directors
of the bot Gardens in the other colonies would help in that.
Scripture truly says we can serve only one Master.
As for Victoria; up til lately, when the peoples eyes became more opened, the most
reckless expenditure has gone on in lawn-making & other unproductive work at the bot
garden, but I, perhaps because I am a foreigner, have only one single herbarium room
built in 1857 and nothing added to it since, while South Australia has devoted even
out of its far lesser means 6000£ in two years to a bot. Museum!
Excuse my frankness & let me remain
regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller.
The Garden was the Centre of Social life; with it I lost all social Standing. The
Governors Palace is in it. (in the reserved ground all planted by me.
My 60 or 70 species of
, largely destroyed, since 1873 cannot now as formerly watch for observation, nor
even have I a place to watch the germination of their seeds, & the experiments on
the timber must be instituted in the open air. So much for my position!