Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller 1871-81, ff. 278-81. 80.07.07Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to William Thiselton-Dyer, 1880-07-07. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/80-07-07>, accessed June 23, 2025
1
MS annotation in red pencil: 'And Septr. 16/80.' Letter not found.
Private
The last mail, dear Mr Dyer, brought me through Sir Charl Nicholson’s attention the
copy of "the Colonies" of the 15 May, in which your able lecture is printed on the
“bot. enterprise of the empire.”
It devolves in me in first instance to show you my deep sense of appreciation in reference
to the generous remarks, which you bestowed on me as a Botanist.
It was all the more gratifying to me, to notice your friendly remarks on my share
in the Australian "Flora",
as so many are inclined to think that my cooperation in the opus was not extensive,
while indeed it has absorbed a large share of my activity during very many of the
best years of my life, and at a period of difficulties, such as the present young
generation of Australia and all future generations will and cannot experience.
2
The supplement to
The colonies and India, 15 May 1880, comprises Thiselton-Dyer (1880b), his lecture 'The botanical enterprise of the Empire' delivered at the meeting of the Royal
Colonial Institute on 11 May, together with the discussion that followed it. The lecture
was also printed as Thisleton-Dyer (1880) and issued separately as Thisleton-Dyer (1880a). Extracts also
appeared in the
Gardeners' chronicle
,
15 May 1880, pp. 615-6.
3
M was mentioned on p. v:
As long as Sir Ferdinand von Mueller is alive, Australia will possess one of the most learned botanists of modern
times, who is devoted to the study of her flora and a master of its details. As a
scientific man, it is impossible not to envy the freedom which he now possesses from
all administrative labour. It is to be hoped that some joint arrangement may be arrived
at amongst the several colonies to secure his unique herbarium of Australian plants
as a permanent public establishment, to be provided with a proper endowment, and to
be preserved for all time as a standard of reference in the Southern Hemisphere for the accurate nomenclature of indigenous plants. It is to the credit
of Victoria to possess him on her civil establishment, but his scientific services,
as an explorer no less than as a scientific botanist, have been rendered to the whole continent, and I observe that the latest of his many publications on the vegetable resources of Australia is a most useful report on the forests of
West Australia.
4
i.e. Bentham (1863-78).
5
‘The most important of [the Colonial Floras] is the Flora Australiensis, prepared
at Kew by Mr. Bentham, with the co-operation of Baron Ferdinand von Mueller in Australia. … From a scientific point of view the completion of the Flora is a very great achievement. … The Colonial Office marked its sense of the importance of the completion of the
Australian Flora by advising Her Majesty to confer upon Mr. Bentham the Companionship
of the Order of St. Michael and St. George, and to raise Baron von Mueller, who already
possessed that distinction, to the Knight Companionship of the Order’ (Thiselton-Dyer (1880b), p. ii).
Accept than
the expression of full gratitude for the cheering manner, in which you spoke about
me.
Nevertheless this pleasure which you gave me, was mingled with great sadness, because
you had a splendid opportunity to remove publicly with a few passing words the stigma,
which utterly undeservedly rests on my horticultural administration and yet no institution
had more weight to set public opinion about me also right on this point, then Kew,
because Kew
knows
what I did from 1857 til 1873 to raise the bot. Garden of Melbourne also as an horticultural
establishment to high fame, though that was before your time. You had such a splendid
opportunity to do me
justice
(favors I do not seek) as a former Director.
But it seems as if the last death blow was given to the attempts, which I still make
with a few friends to resuscitate my Directorship, or to reestablish an other Garden
for my introductions observations experiments and distribution.
See, Mr Dyer, how men of science rallied around Sir Joseph, and prevented the disintegration
of Kew.
My God! how could you express
envey
at my being cast out of my institution, and left with one herbarium room as the small
rest of an once illustrious Department!
The colony Victoria is not so poor as to require to go abegging to all the other Austral
colonies to ask for a few hundred £ from each annually to reestablish a Department
for me, nor could I serve several masters with their then endless official demands,
whereas Vict. alone can give me a
Garden
, and a Gov Botanist here
without
a Garden is as helpless an anomaly, as it would be for Kew to discharge these functions
without a Garden! Kindly remember besides, that six thousand £ annually are disbursed
for parks & Gardens of the Gov around Melbourne, irrespective of the bot. Garden,
and these £6000 with perhaps 2000 acres of Land are in the hands of a crownlands bailiff,
while the Gov Botanist, who furnished in former years (since 1858) nearly all the
trees for
this
enormous area, has
nothing
.
6
See MacLeod (1974) for Hooker’s disputes with Acton Ayrton.
7
See n. 3 above.
The
misrepresentations
of a few Melbourne journals and of a few visitors (or perhaps even correspondents) to Kew, who wish to continue
me suppressed, ought to fly like the chaff before the wind.
Not even my fragmenta can be continued, because I am too poor to keep a collector
in the field!
In the Exhibition now for Melbourne
I shall having nothing, indeed in my grief and humiliation will try to go away during
the exhibition-time as Mr Francis & Mr Casey
would not even allow me to keep my laboratory & apparatus, and as I do not care to limit my exhibits to a few bundles of dried plants and some species of wood.
My God! what a difference even to my position at the Exhibition of 1855!
Even my library has never been fully set up again, since I was deprived of my Garden
Office & House in 1873 (built by myself in 17 years) and have not even the most necessary
new books of recent literature to keep to a small extent pace with my compeers. Your
envey, to see me relieved of all of this, will be a most
powerful weapon
in the hands of my adversaries, and yet I begged so much, from year to year, from
month to month, that you all at Kew should strive to help me into an honorable position
again.
8
The last part of
Fragmenta phytographiae australiae
(B82.12.03) was published in 1882, the only part of vol. 12 to be published.
9
International Exhibition, Melbourne, 1880-1.
10
James Francis was Chief Secretary and James Casey the Minister of Agriculture at the time M lost the directorship of the Botanic Garden.
11
Exposition Universelle, Paris, 1855.
If you have been told unfairly [&] untruthfully, that I did not keep the Garden in order, remember
I
had only
⅓
or
¼
of the present votes, and was eaten up to keep the insatiable young public institutions
supplied since 1858 with trees & other plants. Water for lawns
I
had none, but as soon as a Cousin of a political Minister
intruded on my position, an enormous sum was forthcoming to raise water from the River
Yarra. Remember kindly, that I was the first who built large Glass houses in Australia,
that for years I had the largest collection of plants, even with slender means, in
these colonies, under culture. Indeed I did
far
more for horticulture than for Botany or rather special phytology during very many
years. Since I was kept by inexpressible meanness out of the garden, I have had no
longer the outdoor exercise, which kept me in fair health in former years. My official
position became stultified (which I felt never more keenly than at the approach of
the world Exhibition), my little private fortune became wrecked, I lost all hold on
Society, have grown ill and dispirited, and the hopes of building up a domesticity
were destroyed. And yet, the endless correspondence of Colonists to me for information
did remain the same, just as if I had still the resources of the bot. Garden at my
Command. So you see, dear Mr Dyer, that there is no cause for
envey
in my ruin, but there is
every cause of envey, that Sir Joseph Hooker remained undisturbed in his glorious
career, that
he remained in full command of his resources, free from invaders and distractors,
such as daily I have here to encounter after I was deprived of that, which I had built
up at a lifelong toil. That a leading newspaper, after allowing itself once to be
misled about me, should do all in the most cruel way, to support the man, who glorifies
himself daily and unscrupulously on my expense, is just what would be expected under
the doctrine of infallibility, proclaimed by leading journalism
here
at all events
12
William Guilfoyle, whom M consistently described as a cousin of the Minister, J. J.
Casey.
Now I like to ask you a favor.
Do
spend a few evenings at a spare hour, to read my Directorial reports from 1858 til
1869. Then only you can form a fair judgement! Look, I beg of you, look on the two large lithographed
Garden plans, which I issued in 1865
& 1868
with my Garden Reports and then you will see whether my horticultural administration
was not worth for years a single word of praise.
13
B65.10.01.
14
An error for 1869? See B69.07.03.
Regardfully your
Ferd von Mueller
I trust that in your own hopeful career, you will never experience a fraction of the
misfortune which befel me undeservedly.
This is a hurried letter. I hope it contains nothing that will give you umbrage.
Do also not calculate the money value of Kew & Melbourne the same, your wages vote
there is, I believe, less than half.
Even the Eucal. Atlas
how far more valuable could I have made it had I remained amidst my cultivated trees
at the Garden.
15
i.e. M’s
Eucalyptographia
(B79.13.11 and subsequent parts).
If you were
here
only one day
personally
, you would soon see that there cannot be any envey about my present position.
I will try to see, whether yet a series of the photograms can be obtained, such as
were made at the time of my Directorship, including Victoria regia, which I first
reared [in] Austr
Best thanks for your splendid essay on Hemileia.
16
Thiselton-Dyer (1880c).
If there was a plebiscite on my affairs, I soon should be again in my creation, and
soon do justice again to forests industries &c in my live.
Eucalyptus
Victoria regia
Hemileia