Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1871-81, ff. 215-17. 78.05.18Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1878-05-18. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/78-05-18>, accessed June 23, 2025
Private
18/5/78.
It is so long, dear Sir Joseph, since I was honored with a letter from yourself, that
I feel (after the arrival of your kind lines of 20 March), I ought to answer at once,
the American mail, which brought your & Mr Dyers letter
leaving tomorrow. It is needless to reiterate, that as a discarded Director I have
no courage to write to any of my former colleagues. To Thwaites I have not written
since (5 years ago) I was cast adrift, and I felt keenly the utter want of support
from him in my Directorial position, after unknown to him at my spontaneous (I might
say generous) impulse I procured for him his Doctor-degree gratuitously.
I see a great difference in my former Colleagues; some countenance me just as before,
others are indifferent, others have abandoned me. — of course the Gov. Botanist
out
of the bot Garden is as powerless as a General without an Armee. The latter might
still write some works on warfare (if he pays for it himself) but could not take the
field. But why repeat to you, what I so often urged, what every professional Director
can see at a glance!
1
Neither Hooker's nor Thiselton Dyer's letter has been found.
2
An honorary PhD awarded in 1864 by the Imperial Leopoldo-Carolinian Academy, based
in Halle, Germany. For the proposal that Thwaites be awarded a doctorate, see M to
C. von Martius, 25 June 1864.
3
This letter is not paragraphed except after 'nephos' on the final page of the letter
and after 'Private' on f. 217. Other paragraphing has been inserted, always before
the beginning of a new line.
This Ministry seems not unfriendly to me, altho' Mr Casey (the cousin of the Nurseryman
at the Garden) has hitherto frustrated, that anything is done for the resuscitation
of my once celebrated Department. The Estimates are now for the new finance-year (commencing
1 July) under consideration, and I sought the influence of Sir Sam. Wilson with the
Governor
to reinstate me, and to place the present
Curator
on the far more extensive parks & reserves, as
his
proper place. But, alas!, also this hope was crushed, because his Exc. told me last
week in the presense of Signor D'Albertis
(the New Guinea Explorer) that you told him, you wished to be treated like myself!
I pointed out that there must be a misapprehension on the subject, that you could
not possibly have said so, that you must have imperfectly informed (though I wrote
so fully on the sad changes which overcame me) It was to no purpose! and I fear much
that this assertion of your view, will hinder my being restored to my position, without
which my temporary ruin becomes one permanency. I thought of
marriying,
as soon as my Directorship, my garden, my votes, my staff, buildings &c were restored
to me, but of course, I could not think of it now, and become now grey and the hopes
of life blighted! That is the tanks
for my work, after working all my life for others. The Governor mentions that my
income was 20,000 francs annually; nominally it is £800, actually not more than £300
in one of the
most expensive
places of the globe. I am certain, that one can live in England as well for £100
as here for three times that amount. Remember kindly that I have to defray officerent,
office furniture, books, journals, instruments, laboratory means &c out of my salary,
the few hundred extra left me providing merely for the Museum Clerk & some Museum
material and some minor daily expenses. When I compare that £[7]0, 000 have been spent
in my bot. Garden in the 5 years since I left, that distribution of plants 'en gross'
ceased and so all scientific work there and that not £15,000 permanent improvement
can be shown, while an enormous number of my valuable plants is lost or destroyed,
I feel inexpressibly embittered. All this deep grief and financial loss to me and
stoppage of work could have been saved me by a few demonstrative words kindly from
Kew. And now even, you and others might do something yet for me, altho' the time has
long passed, when the Governor or men in power here could have been directly adressed.
See, my dear Sir Joseph, how your lamented father kept in his correspondence with
Sir Henry Barkly my interest awake.
4
Sir George Bowen.
5
Luigi Maria d'Albertis was travelling from Sydney to London and visited M during the
period the SS
Garonne
was in Melbourne— from 7 May until it 'cleared out' on 10 May (
Argus
, 8 May 1878, p. 4; 11 May 1878, p. 6).
6
thanks?
All that can be now done, is to adress a
memorandum to myself
, setting forth the necessity that any Gov. Botanist (wherever it may be) wants his
bot. Garden (and that in a clime like that of Victoria on an extensive scale), that
he is helpless without such an institution to do justice to the requirements for industry
& particularly in a new country, that I require proper staff and working votes & buildings
& laboratory just like the observatory & any other institution. The Casey Ministry
withheld almost anything except the Salary, to force me to leave the country. I gladly
would have left this ungrateful colony, but my Museum collections are only partly
my own, and I have no leisure to separate from 300,000 specimens what is my own; the
library is also only partly my private property; so my leaving the colony (of course
without pension
and after spending £10,000 of my own means & 31 years of my life in Australia) means
to stop my work literary also. You may have always thought, that in
my many appeals to you
for the aid of your influence as the head of bot Affairs in the whole British Empire,
I have exaggerated the ruin, into which by envy, jealousy, ignorance indifference
& finally nepotism & vulgar usurpation I have drifted. You never gave me any support
as a horticulturist though I know as a traveller more of the treatment of plants then
the best of Gardeners &
did wonders
in culture & scenic planting also with small means, as demonstrated by my departmental
reports. Remember I was even the first in Australia to have the Victoria regia,
and my collection of plants was far ahead of Sydney & Adelaide so long as I was not
crippled[.]
7
than?
8
See Maroske (1992).
9
editorial addition — punctuation obscured by binding.
What use is it to praise me up as a
Botanist
, when I have neither means to keep a collector in the field for new materials, nor
fund to bring out the Eucalyptus Atlas nor almost anything else. This month I have
to sign bills for £200 (the first time since my early orphanage that I incur debts)
to pay for the printing of the english Edition of Wittstein,
which of course will not sell to bring back half the outlay. Will you believe that
Baron von Mueller, a fellow of the R S of London & C.M.G. has sunk into such abject
poverty, that he cannot keep even a single servant and lives in an unfurnished rented
house, where he does his office work! My meal (
an only one
a day) is sent me from a cheep rest[ua]rant. I do not think, that it is
your
wish, nor that of any other man of science that
this
should be my fate. My School flora cannot be printed for want of fund, & what little
I had of additional means, was absorbed by the "select plants",
not one single friendly expression on it has reached me from
any one
in England thereon (unique as the work is) except Dr Masters.
It may have been favorably reviewed for all I know in Nature,
but I am far too poor to subscribe for such a periodical now. What little cash I
had, was spent in my last journey to West Australia to get away from the scenes of
my grief for a while.
10
Wittstein (1878), i.e. B78.06.09.
11
B76.12.04.
12
Gardeners' chronicle (1877), p. 412.
13
Nature (1877), vol. 16, p. 100.
Private
Remember kindly, that
here
the colonists do not care for Museum work or for describing new plants; much distress
prevails in the colony; I am looked to as Gov Botanist
mainly
to foster or create new industries of vegetable origin; that
I cannot do
either at the University (where they tried to force me to) nor without my Garden.
I said always, 25 years ago! to go to the University, which is more over fully provided
by Prof. M'Coy & Dr Bird,
would be like placing Hooker in addition to Bentley.
You
gave
me support in
this
, and I showed your letter against an University position,
and it may have helped me hitherto to avoid that cliff. Of course at the University
for want of ground, votes & appliances I should simply be
extinguished
as an independent worker. I was long eager to visit Europe, but as a discarded Director
I cannot meet my former Colleagues with self-respect, and indeed a journey to Europe
would have thus no meaning, as it could be turned hardly to any account for a Department,
which is no longer under my control & which has been mainly changed to a Cremorne.
14
Samuel Dougan Bird, lecturer in materia medica and theory and practice of medicine in the University of Melbourne.
15
Robert Bentley.
16
Letter not found.
To ask me to make a new garden, means 20 years work again, with the prospect of an
other Cousin of a Minister taking it away again from me. At my age & after my health
& strenght become so impaired by my "struggle for existence" I cannot form a new bot.
Garden. Where are the votes? How am I to compeat? To conclude thus far my last appeal
to you for aid, which would have been far more powerful had I not been required to
ask for it, whatever memorandum is sent (if any) pray forward it to me
direct
not to the Governor or the Ministry.
Now let me congratulate you, dear Sir Joseph, to your renewed family happiness, of
which I envy you from the depth of my feelings. May your young son
become the Hooker nepos!
17
Joseph Symons Hooker, first son from Joseph Hooker's second marriage, was born on
14 December 1877.
Turning to the pages of your letter you speak of
my
and Bentham's Flora. My God! Is it ever quoted as such? What a ruinous arrangement,
into which I entered, even in this respect. Thus a main object also of my life is
lost! to me.
No
, I ought at least to have been a cooperator (as in reality I am) but now I am also
in this respect
nothing
!, and my adversaries here use this false position into [wh]ich I was placed [...]
Bentham also to oppress me.
18
illegible — text obscured by blue paper stuck to page.
Perhaps a sound Statesmanship will prevail here in my affairs, though Mr Casey is
already on his backway;
if so I shall be able to write once more with renewed hopes of life and increased
means for work & prospects in a more cheerful spirit. If any expressions of mine in
this or former letters (it may be my last in my fluctuating health) may be regarded
by you as not right, then kindly excuse it, because I combat not merely for the continuance
of my own work, but as a scientific man for a scientific position on scientific principles.
19
J. J. Casey lost his ministerial position with the defeat of the government led by
G. B. Kerferd in August 1875. Thereafter he maintained an independent position in
the Legislative Assembly between the conservative and radical parties.
Regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller