Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 65.04.25a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1865-04-25 [65.04.25a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/65-04-25a>, accessed September 11, 2025

25, WILTON PLACE, S.W.
April 25/65
My dear Sir
I write a few lines to say that the Great Victoria is safely arrived and although your boxes are not yet at Kew not being yet cleared they will no doubt be there today or tomorrow for the agent had your order for their delivery before the vessel arrived — Clearing vessels however always takes some time in London.
I received yesterday yours of the 24th Feby
1
M to G. Bentham, 24 February 1865.
In reply to what you say about including
Euphorbiaceae

Search for Euphorbiaceae in

in the 3d vol
2
Of Bentham (1863-78).
I believe I have already mentioned that according to our views if included in
Polypetalae

Search for Polypetalae in

at all it ought to have been in the 1st as they cannot any how be considered as Calyciflorous in their affinities It is after much consideration that we determined on leaving them in their old place amongst
Monochlamydeae

Search for Monochlamydeae in

as notwithstanding the presence of petals in some genera they are generally small and imperfect and their absence is the prevaililng feature of the Order
3
See Maroske (2006).
besides that I should as a matter of convenience be sorry to work them up till after the publication of Mueller of Argau's work in the Podromus who has taken so much pains with them.
4
J. Müller (1866).
As I feel bound to get at least 1400 species into the 3d vol to make up for the deficiency of the 2d I do not see how I can do it without going far into
Compositae

Search for Compositae in

. I have I know a great deal of work before me and fear I shall not be able to begin printing till the close of the year but I shall do my best. You say I ought to extend my descriptions more for I have overlooked cardinal characters — if I have done so it is not from shortening descriptions but from not having drawn them up with sufficient care notwithstanding the pains I have taken. Descriptions of the length I give them ought to include everything essential — whether they do or not depends on the ability of the author — and you know as well as any one else how much easier it is to write a long description than a short one, but how much more practically useful to the botanist is a short than a long one.
You ask whether we quote in our Genera the plates of your Illustrations of Victoria Plants
5
See M to G. Bentham, 24 February 1865, referring to Bentham & Hooker (1862-83) and B65.02.06.
— We did quote them in the first part when we got them but the sheets and plates then came so irregularly and imperfectly that we had not the proper title till after our first part was out and now we have only loose plates contents and index without text or title page of what we do not understand whether it is the 2d vol of your Plants indigenous to Victoria or a separate work. I wish you would continue and complete your great work of the Victorian Flora — which is certainly your best and most useful way of correcting the errors of my Flora, besides that its completion would be the greatest credit to yourself.
You speak of the omission of
Acacia astringens

Search for Acacia astringens in

— If it is A. astringens A. Cunn in Don. Gen. Syst
6
G. Don (1831-8), vol. 2, p. 405.
you will find it in the index and under A. penninervis p. 362 — astringens not adst ringens
7
See M to G. Bentham, 24 February 1865 and notes thereto.
is I believe the proper latin spelling and is A. Cunningham in G Don.
I am afraid it would be rather a difficult matter to interest the ladies of England in a search after Leichhardt — at least I should not well know how to set about it. They have had rather an overdose of the search after Franklin.
8
Sir John Franklin's 1845 expedition in search of the North West Passage was lost. His wife, Jane Franklin, maintained public pressure on the Admiralty to continue searching for him and sent out search expeditions of her own. See Alexander (2013); for details of Franklin's expeditions and those in search of him, see D. Smith (1877).
During the last month I have again been several days kept away from work by family affairs. I have however nearly finished Melaleuca of which I think I shall be obliged to retain about 100 species although I reduce many of Schauer's and others. Schauer is I think in general accurate but I cannot agree with his multiplication of species and genera.
Lepidagathis

Search for Lepidagathis in

for instance (which is your
Melaleuca hakeacea

Search for Melaleuca hakeacea in

) he characterises by the calyx tube and inflorescence both of which appear to my eyes to be precisely as in several other Melaleucas
Asteromyrtus

Search for Asteromyrtus in

includes about 3 tropical species with circumciss calyces but that does not appear to me to be of sufficient importance to found a genus being apparently unaccompanied by any other
Callistemon

Search for Callistemon in

as you say almost passes into Melaleuca still I think it may be maintained in accordance with the views of the most eminent botanists.
Ever yours sincerely
George Bentham