The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: Kew London W ¶ Nov 16/61 ¶ My dear Sir ¶ ¶ Since I last wrote to you I have been working up the Australian Hibbertieae which it was necessary to do in order to decide for our Genera on your proposed ...

Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 61.11.16

Plant names

Adrastea
Search for Adrastea in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Candollea
Search for Candollea in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eucalyptus
Search for Eucalyptus in
Hemistemma
Search for Hemistemma in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Hibbertia
Search for Hibbertia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Hibbertia sect Hemipleurandra
Search for Hibbertia sect Hemipleurandra in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Hibbertieae
Search for Hibbertieae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Huttia
Search for Huttia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Leguminosae
Search for Leguminosae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Ochrolasia
Search for Ochrolasia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Pachynema
Search for Pachynema in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Pleurandra
Search for Pleurandra in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1861-11-16. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/61-11-16>, accessed April 5, 2025

For a published copy of extracts of this letter, see Daley (1927-8), p. 98.

Kew London W

Nov 16/61

My dear Sir

Since I last wrote to you I have been working up the Australian which it was necessary to do in order to decide for our Genera on your proposed consolidation of the whole except into one genus I have carefully examined the whole of those I have hitherto accepte

accepted?

(including 7 species of Browns chiefly from the N. Coast which I do not see in any other collection and of which 4 were not seen by de Candolle)

Robert Brown (1773-1858); A. P. de Candolle (1818-1821), vol. 1, pp. 411-12.

altogether I have dissected the ovaries of more than 200 specimens and upon the principles which have guided us in our Genera we are disposed to agree with you as to uniting and with Hibbertia. But is too constant in its characters to be neglected notwithstanding the little differences in habit. I always find 5 bundles of stamens the filaments united to above the middle where there are 5 carpels, all bear 2 to 5 or 6 anthers, and sometimes there is one single stamen within each. Where the carpels are reduced to 4, 3 or 2 it often happens that 1, 2 or 3 of the bundles are reduced to a single stamen — whilst in those Hibbertias where there is any union of the filaments it is short and irregular — and I have in vain looked for any example of a passage from one to the other. I divide into 4 distinct sections, 1 stamens 1-sided with barren staminodia ones above barren ones outside only them 2 Hemipleurandra stamens 4 sided with staminodia on each side more or less containing the circle but none outside the fertile ones except in 2 species (Hemistephus) 3 stamens divided without any barren ones 4 stamens all round These I divide into several groups Some have some have not staminodia outside the fertile stamens. s are all Western, so are Hemipleurandras, s Eastern & Southern with one or two Western Hibbertias dispersed all over but some of the groups specially Northern Western or South Eastern. s Northern with one Western species — is a pure Hibbertia.

we keep distinct It is a step towards . We have 3 true s besides which we unite with it as a section The 2 inner barren stamens alternating with the ovaries are a curious character in the united genus.

I sent you in my last letter a sketch of the proposed title page for the Flora — I forgot to add that I should of course explain fully in the Preface the part you will have taken in the work, and hope to do full credit to your zeal and success.

What I am more anxious for as soon as possible is the printed sheets of your Victorian Flora

B62.03.03; sheets had been sent as ready, see, for example, M to W. Hooker, 25 August 1860 (in this edition as 60-08-25a). More were sent in January 1862, see M to W. Hooker 24 January 1862 (in this edition as 62-01-24d).

— notes on localities and habit of species not comprised in that Flora and the loan of specimens of those species of which you have not hitherto sent us specimens — all for the families above which as you say will probably fill the first volume The second volume will include the terrible genus which perhaps might be worked up by you with notes that I might add from the comparison with specimens published in Europe And what I should suggest as most conducive to the general purpose would be your proceeding as rapidly as possible with your important Flora of Victoria so as to keep well a-head of me. My work on the limited plan of Flora Hongkongensis

Bentham (1861a).

can never supercede the detailed history of the plants contained in your Flora.

I intended so arranging the typography of the habitats so as that the eye shall at once catch the plants belonging to the several divisions North Coast, Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, West Australia, and perhaps North West Australia — Pray send in your first any suggestions for consideration as to this or other topics.

Yours ever sincerely

George Bentham