Document information
Physical location:
Natural History Museum, London, General Library, MSS OC 62 (Owen correspondence), vol. XIX, ff. 359-62. 61.08.24Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Richard Owen , 1861-08-24. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/61-08-24>, accessed April 20, 2025
Melbourne botanic & zoologic Garden
24. Aug 1861.
Venerable and dear Sir,
It has been to me a source of so profound gratification, that the Royal Society of
Britain deemed myself worthy of enrolling my name amongst that of its members,
that I cannot refrain from expressing to you, ever estimated and dear Sir, my deep
gratitude for having in the elevated position you occupy in the society given your
powerful support to my election. I can not but be aware, that the honor bestowed on
me was not gained by what I humbly may have endeavoured to perform in the scientific
world, but that I enjoy the triumph of my elevation into the Society, in which you
are now one of the main pillars and in which Newton once presided, — alone through
the favor of patronizing powerful scientific men.
1
M was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London on 6 June 1861.
Whilst thus highly estimating the honor conferred on me, I trust you will pardon it,
if I solicit once more your influence to give stability to my election, and I therefore
pray that you will kindly exercise your power in the Council of the Royal Society
to cause me to be exempted from the rule of appearing within a certain period personally
before the Royal Society, for which purpose my fixed official position as the head
of an extensive department may not for some time to come aford me an opportunity.
2
Owen was not an officer or member of the Royal Society Council in 1861.
3
'Resolved, — That Mr Ferdinand Müller, now in Australia, be granted an extension of
the time of his admission into the Society during his stay abroad.' See Minutes of the Council of the Royal Society, from December 16th, 1858 to December
16th, 1869 (1870), p. 101.
I have written simultaneously to Sir Roderick Murchison, who always evinced such friendly
feelings towards myself, to secure also his good offices on this occasion.
4
Letter not found. See M to R. Murchison, 25 September 1861 for a reiteration of the request.
— The theory of the origin of the animated and vegetative creation, existing and past,
having since the issue of Darwin's work
again so much agitated the minds of the natural philosophers, perhaps you will permit
me, honored and dear Sir, to offer, as I have ventured to do towards our great Murchison,
a word on so deeply an important a question. May I then, humble as I am, endeavour
to strengthen, perhaps unnecessarily, the opinion, so powerfully upheld on zoological
and geological grounds by yourself, that nature created species by design, in recording
(as I feel to do bound), that during scarcely less than 22 years of observations of
the forms of vegetable life in free nature, I had during travels extending in Europe
and Australia over nearly 30,000 miles, never cause to entertain any doubt, that we
are surrounded by species clearly defined in nature, all perfect in their organisation,
all destined to fulfil by unalterable laws those designs for which the power of our
creating god called them into existence. And I feel all the more bound to bear testimony
to this great and sublime truth, since vegetative forms are much less restricted in
variation than those of animal life. Hence it arose that the species of the vegetable
world are so immensely overrated in number, hence the cause, that in a vast number
of diagnostic definitions of plants we see what is alterable misappreciated as permanently
characteristic, whereas but too many of the permanent tests of species, especially
those emanating from carpology remain not sufficiently revealed. I
have therefore no hesitation in affirming that nature in her eternal laws created
always well-defined unalterable species; but those of the empire of plants are hitherto
vastly overestimated in number and are greatly more variable, than phytographers have
been inclined to admit!
5
Darwin (1859).
6
Letter not found.
But I write these words not without feelings of regret, when thinking of Darwin, a
man, for whose labours I always entertained a high veneration, who honored me with
his friendship and who above all was amongst those whose writings as a traveller inspired
me in my boyhood with delight and arose in my breast a desire for imitating his example,
and whose works together with those of other great natural philosophers, awoke in
my youthful mind a craving ever profound to share in revealing the wonderful works
of nature to human insight, a desire which gave to my life its plan and its direction.—
Ever ready to serve so great a man as yourself I remain full of veneration attachment
& obedience
yours Ferd. Mueller