Document information

Physical location:

F97/2162, unit 972, VPRS 3992/P inward registered correspondence, VA 475 Chief Secretary's Department, Public Record Office, Victoria. M97.10.06

Preferred Citation:

Alexander Macdonald to the Von Mueller Memorial Committee, 1897-10-06 [M97.10.06]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/mentions/selected/M97-10-06-final.odt>, accessed May 15, 2026

1
Item is a typescript, evidently prepared for the meeting of the Memorial Committee on 6 October 1897. MS annotation by William Potter at the head of the filed copy of this report: 'Note — At a meeting of the Memorial Committee held on 4th of December 1896, the Executors wer[e] expressly asked to act in regard to the grave and the family claim altogether apart from the Memorial Committee. | W. Potter (a member of the Memorial Committee)'.
M's executors, William Potter and Alexander and Hermann Büttner, had launched a public appeal to cover the cost of erecting a monument on M's grave. Meanwhile some of M's scientific friends had formed a separate Memorial Committee 'to secure sufficient funds to allow of the establishment of some permanent Memorial which shall worthily perpetuate his name' that was formally established as a national committee in November 1897; see W. Wiesbaden and W. Baldwin Spencer to the general public, November 1897 (in this edition as M97-11-00).
Von MUELLER MEMORIAL COMMITTEE.
REPORT OF THE HON. SECRETARY.
It will be in the recollection of Members of this Committee that at our last Meeting held on the 4th December 1896, the Committee instructed me to write to the Member for North Melbourne (Mr. Prendergast M.L.A.,) to ask that he would again bring the subject of a memorial to the late distinguished Baron von Mueller before the Legislative Assembly, and ascertain what the Government would contribute to the Memorial Committee.
I did so by letter on the 8th December, and as I received no reply, I asked Mr. Potter to kindly wait upon Mr. Prendergast at the House, and induce him to put a question to the Premier before the close of the season. This Mr. Potter did, and waited, I am told until 2 o'clock a.m., to hear the question put. The Premier in answer promised to enquire into the matter during recess.
2
Prendergast had previously suggested in Parliament the erection of a 'national memorial' to M (Victorian Hansard, 12 November 1896, p. 3285). He was now recorded (Victorian Hansard, 23 December 1896, p. 4953) as asking the Premier 'if the Government would be prepared to do anything in connexion with perpetuating the memory of the late Baron von Mueller?'. 'He did not generally stand up', he went on, 'for the purpose of advocating the erection of a monument to any man, but the late Baron von Mueller was worthy of some recognition. There was a desire on the part of many honorable members that something should be done to perpetuate his memory. The Premier had already promised to consider the matter, and he was sure the honorable gentleman would give it a fair and reasonable consideration. He would like to know whether anything had yet been done to perpetuate the memory of the late baron, who was one of the most learned men this country had ever known and certainly a man from whom the country had received more benefit that from any other citizen'. To this, the Premier, G. Turner, responded: 'I have had no opportunity of considering the matter. I have promised to look into it.'
A few days before Mr. Turner left Melbourne for Adelaide, the late Baron's executors waited upon the Premier to ascertain what the Government intended to do in relation to the claim submitted in their letter of the 2nd December last.
3
The deputation was reported the following day in the Argus, 16 March 1897, p. 7.
At this interval, after drawing Sir George Turner's attention to the fact that Parliament had granted £3200 to the widow of the late R.H. Francis of the Railway Department in 1894-5, being a gratuity equal to one month's pay for each year of service, Mr. Potter pointed
4
out omitted?
that if the same principle were applied to the Baron's case, it would give an amount of £2286,
5
Error for £2886, as shown below.
which could be allotted as follows: —
Nine months' salary towards payment of debts
£ 600
Grant to Memorial Committee
£ 500
Balance to Baron's relatives
£1786
Total
£2886
and a memorandum to this effect was left with the Premier. No reply has yet come to hand. Mr. Panton, I understand, subsequently saw the Premier on the subject.
On the 17th of March the Executors received a letter from the Premier's Department to the following effect: —
"With reference to the case of the late Baron von Mueller, the Premier desires me to say that the Cabinet has decided to grant nine months' pay as a gratuity, to be paid to the executors at once. The Government will also, if requested by the Memorial Committee contribute towards the expense of a monument over the Baron's grave to a reasonable amount."
(Signed) R. S. Rogers,
Secretary to the Premier.
Mr. Potter at once informed Mr. Panton and myself of the communication, and Mr. Panton's view was that the executors should deal with the monument over the grave themselves, apart altogether from the Memorial Committee. This I understood they intended to do, and on Friday last, Mr. Potter showed me a photograph of the monument they had selected, and a copy of the letter the executors published in the "Age" on Saturday last.
6
The letter requested donations toward the cost of erecting a monument on M's grave (Age (Melbourne), 2 October 1897, p. 10. See also the illustrated four-page pamphlet (in this edition as M97-00-00) which included a description of the proposed monument.
He also informed me that he intended to see the Premier upon the subject.
On Monday the 4th Inst., I wrote to Mr. C.A. Topp, asking him to inform me what amount the Government had promised towards the erection of a suitable Public Memorial to the late Baron von Mueller, apart from any other amount altogether, which had been promised to the Baron's executors, and requesting the favor of a reply in time for to-day's Meeting, no reply, however, has yet been received.
I understand that the Executors will ask the Committee to honour the Baron's memory by (through its Chairman) unveiling the monument they propose to erect, when it shall have been placed over the grave.
The Memorial Committee can afterwards take steps to procure some other practical way of perpetuating the Baron's memory.
A. C. MACDONALD,
Hon. Secretary.
October 6th 1897.