Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, archives, Letters from Joseph Hooker JDH/2/3/1, Ada-Bar, ff. 152-3. M65.10.09Preferred Citation:
Joseph Hooker to Henry Barkly, 1865-10-09 [M65.10.09]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/mentions/selected/M65-10-09-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
1
This volume consists mainly of transcriptions, most in the form of typescript carbon
copies, of Joseph Hooker's letters. There is no indication in the volume as to the
date or author of the transcriptions, or the location of the originals, and the Archivist
at Kew in June 2000 had no knowledge of the provenance of the volume. Folios 152-260
are letters to Sir Henry Barkly, October 1865 to November 1876, with one of 18 August
1866 (possibly an enclosure) to Charles Meller (see below) and ff. 261-3 to Lady Annie
M. Barkly, July-August 1867. There are some gaps in the text and a few possible misreadings.
Many letters have been annotated or asterisked in red ink or in pencil. Each letter
in the Barkly series has been numbered. The subjects of the early letters are Hooker's
various difficulties with the Board of Works 'under a department of Govt. already
tired of scientific expenditure on Kew' (19 January 1866; f. 154), and Charles Meller's
journey to, and health, conduct and position at Mauritius, where Barkly was Governor,
that apparently gave cause for concern.
Extracts only are given here, to provide context to comments about M.
Buxton, October 9th 1865
My dear Sir Henry
The papers will ere this have announced to you the sad loss I have experienced […]
I have lost in my father a companion of 25 years
(we having one commmon object in life) and because the circumstances of his death
were peculiarly sad to me. He was but 4 days ill, and on the third I was seized with
rheumatic fever and lay imobile in an adjoining chamber during his decease […] after
six weeks illness I was brought here where I am recovering […] my father has a very
kind unanswered letter from you, dated August 3rd […] The Board of Works […] have
given me the Directorship, the duties I shall endeavour to conduct as zealously (though
I fear they will never be as efficiently) as my father […] Poor Mueller will miss my father terribly, more perhaps than anyone on that side
of the Globe. Bentham and I have both written to him,
and he is vastly pleased with a box of plants that he has received from Kew.
I shall do everything I can to gratify him. If the Victorian Govt. would recommend
him for a Knighthood, I should suppose there will be no difficulty; and if my opinion
were worth asking it should be most strongly in his favor, and I would quote Schomburg
as an
in every way
inferior precedent.
…
2
William Hooker died on 12 August 1865.
3
G. Bentham to M, 21 September 1865; J. Hooker to M, 9 October 1865.
4
See M to J. Hooker, 24 July 1865.
5
The explorer Robert Schomburgk, knighted in 1844?
6
See Lucas (2013a). In later letters to Barkly, Hooker continued to discuss the possibility
of M's being knighted. Thus on 23 September 1867, he wrote:
Poor Mueller has broken down in health, and writes Mr. Bentham a dolorous letter about
his squabbles with Democracy etc., he has gone to the seaside to recruit, and I sincerely
hope for better accounts of him. I see that a batch of Colonial gentlemen are to be
knighted, and hope that he will come in for a share. (RBG Kew, archives, Letters from
Joseph Hooker vol., Ada-Bar, ff. 170-1)
See also J. Hooker to H. Barkly, 24 September 1868 (in this edition s M68-09-24).