Document information
Physical location:
Outward letter book 2, no. 63/81, Museum of Victoria, Melbourne. M63.04.25Preferred Citation:
Frederick McCoy to Henry Barkly, 1863-04-25 [M63.04.25]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/mentions/selected/M63-04-25-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
1
Letter not found. MS is a file copy.
My dear Sir Henry Barkly
In reply to the query you did me the honour to address to me touching the proposition
of removing the large meteorite to London I beg to state the exact position of the matter
Some years ago I applied to Mr Bruce
through Mr Fitzgibbon and other of his friends for permission to place the specimen
in our Victorian Museum and in January 1862 made a direct application by letter to
him to the same effect to which he replied that he had originally purchased the specimen
with the intention of sending it to the British Museum but that as he found the Govt
had established a Public Museum in the Colony he
presented one half to the
Victorian Museum unconditionally and retained for the Brit. Mus. the right of claiming
the other half. In his last letter pubd in the Argus of last Decr he states that he
presented one half to the Colonial Museum "leaving to the British Museum the right
of cutting off one half at their own expense" if the authorities of the Brit. Mus.
thought proper.
The onus being thus left with the Brit. Mus. of cutting the specimen a course which
I am informed the Trustees think improper.
2
James Bruce.
3
The Director of the Botanic Gardens having taken upon himself to present this meteorite
to the home Museum without consulting the Victn Museum Department, or the Government,
excited I am informed considerable public indignation and (without any action on my
part) the matter was brought under the notice of the Government some nine months ago
and the Hon. the Chief Sec. appointed a Board with a Cabinet Minister as Chairman
to consider and report on the proposition for depriving the Colony of a valuable specimen
and I as Director of the Museum received a letter directing that no steps shd be taken
for its removal without the knowledge of the Government.
The Board sat yesterday and further evidence is to be taken, but as Yr Excellency
desires to inform the authorities of the Brit. Mus. of the state of the case by this Mail I may be permitted
to state that the Govt inform me of their desire to retain the half of the Meteorite
presented to them by Mr Bruce and to respect the right reserved for the British Mus.
by that gentleman of cutting off half at their own expense if they saw no impropriety in it.
4
The chairman was George Evans; F. McCoy to G. Evans, 21 April 1863 (No. 63/70, outward letter book 2, Museum of Victoria, Melbourne) indicates that Evans had requested that McCoy 'should see that nothing was done in the matter until [Evans'] return from N. Zealand'.
The principal Scientific Men of the Colony have written their opinion that the Specimen
shd be retained here and Professor Neumeyer
the Government Magnetic Observer, whose observations on the specimen have been pubd
by Haidinger
reports that its Magnetic character wd be totally changed by the voyage to the North.
Hemisphere and it seems there are no scientific reasons why the specimen shd. be removed.
5
Georg Neumayer.
6
Haidinger (1862), Haidinger (1862a).
I have &c
F. McC.