Document information
Physical location:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Archives,DC/74/52. M56.04.08Preferred Citation:
William Denison to William Hooker, 1856-04-08 [M56.04.08]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/mentions/selected/M56-04-08-final.odt>, accessed July 26, 2026
Govnt House
8 April 56
My dear Sir William
I am truly glad to find that I have satisfied you in my selection of Mueller to accompany
the North Australian Expedition — I was very well pleased with what I saw of him [judging] of course altogether from the very transient view I had of him and from his correspondence with me — he was recommended to me by Professor Harvey —
I trust that the Expedition will be successful, that is that the men will return safe - for successful in one sense they must be if they get back that is they will discover much that is unknown as yet.
— I confess that I do not participate in Sturts views of the advantages which will be derived from the country should it prove as fertile as the valley of the Nile — by no possible process
can it ever become a channel of communication from these Colonies to the North & thus to India &c An odd thousand miles or so of land carriage is not so easily got over.
— The sphere of our knowledge however will be extended – the Botany, Zoology [&] Geology of those districts will be ascertained and certain doubtful geographical questions may be put to rest —
1
Charles Sturt was involved in the discussions concerning the planning of the expedition, and
believed in the likelihood of fertile land being found that would facilitate land
communication between Western Australia and the eastern colonies (see his letter,
dated 12 February 1854 to the Society read at the meeting of 27 February 1854, but
not published by the Society. It was published in
Sun
(London), 13 March 1854, p. [8], as 'Observations on the proposed North Australian Expedition, under Captain Stokes,
R.N., by Captain Sturt'. No indication has been found that Sturt was responsible for the wording of the penultimate object of the instructions given to Gregory that included 'There can be no question
b
ut that the interests of the eastern provinces, and of
commerce, will be greatly promoted by the establishment of a practicable
road
between them and the Gulf of Carpentaria,
in as
much as it is impossible to foresee the extensive and beneficial results
w
hich might lead in facilitating our intercourse with the islands in the China Seas
' (
A.
Gregory
(1857c), p. 4).
I had all the members of the expedition before me previous to their Embarkation and gave them a lecture on the necessity of Subordination & unity
of Action – I was afraid that the scientific members might not be disposed to yield obedience to Mr Gregory, and that being gathered together from the East & West, North & South they might not harmonize with each other — I have heard of their arrival at
the mouth of the River the navigation is not pleasant as they ran ashore on a Coral Reef & had to wait for a Spring Tide to float them off. the account of the land in the vicinity of the mouth of the river is not promising they have lost some horses, but were to push up the country about the beginning of October — the hot season will try them I am afraid however we will hope for the best. I have asked to be permitted to send a small vessel to look after them in case of any accident & I hope this will be acceded to
— You will see the report of Mr Gregory at the Col Office - I forwarded it by the last mail. —
2
In a comment following the reading of A. Gregory (1857b), dated from
the
Victoria River
,
14 June 1856
,
to a meeting of the Royal Geographical Society on 10 November 1856,
Mr Merivale
{Under-secretary in
Colonial Office
]
reported that ‘it was believed that supplies had been sent by Sir William Denison
from New South Wales in a vessel called the
"
Torch
"'
.
When Gregory reached the Albert River
on the Gulf of Carpentaria
on 31 August 1856, signs of a visit by
Torch
were found, but Gregory ‘came to the conclusion that it had no reference to the Expedition’
(
A.
Gregory
(
1858), p. 100
)
.
In fact, when
Torc
h
reached the
Albert
r
iver on 1 August,
the commander with two boats
ascended to
‘the Tongue of land at the fork of the river, 50 miles from the mouth’ where
they
‘left substantial indications of our having been there, on the larger trees, and enclosed
full particulars in a bottle suspended from a branch’
(
Inquirer and commercial news
(Perth, WA
), 25 March 1857, p. 3)
.
Torch
, commanded by Lieut. William Chimmo, had been engaged in survey work
and other duties
in NSW waters and the Pacific since 1853. It was sold in May 1856 and was on its delivery
voyage to Singapore during which it was engaged in several
g
overnment tasks, including seeking news of Gregory’s expedition (various Australian
newspapers of the period)
.
See also Chimmo (1857), read to the
Royal Geographical Society
on 12 January 1857.
3
Gregory’s
report (
A.
Gregory
(1857a)
)
,
dated Victoria River
,
24 September 1855, on
the ‘Progress of the North Australian Expedition’
,
contain
ing
his
account of
the grounding on the reef
and
his
plans to delay any distant exploration to the end of October
was
‘communicated by the Colonial Office’
and
read at
a
meeting of the Royal Geographical Society
on 11 February 1856. It was
published in the
Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society
, vo
l. 1 sessions 18
5
6–6 and 1856–7
(1
857), pp. 32-3
.
I am attempting to establish a philosophical society here and am about to experiment
on the strength & the physical qualities of the woods we sent home to the Paris exhibition — should you wish for duplicate specimens of these I can furnish them & when the Expnts are made, give you the results into the bargain.
pray believe me
most truly yours
W Denison