Document information

Physical location:

Letter press copy book 3, p. 141, Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane. 95.07.06

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Frederick Bailey to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1895-07-06. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1890-6/1895/95-07-06-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026

July 6th [189]5
1
editorial addition.
Dear Baron
As I never hear from you I suppose that your time is all taken up. I am obliged to you for the orchid pamphlet but must say that all such publications should be published in the colonies. The Australian workers are too much kept in the dark with regard to the plants of New Guinea.
2
Bailey is referring to a reprint containing papers by Kränzlin that included many species authored jointly by him and M from the part of New Guinea administered by Queensland, as well as species collected from the German colonies that were authored by Kränzlin alone; this is confirmed by a letter from Wilhelm Bäuerlen to Joseph Maiden, 2 July 1895 (MRS 203/4, Inwards correspondence — special bundles, 1886-1921, 95/681 Archives of the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney) in which Bäuerlen reports receiving a copy of the reprint from M and mentions species collected by him that are included in the papers, at least one in Kränzlin (1894) and another in Kränzlin (1895).
I should have been better pleased ha[d] [y]ou
3
editorial addition — MS damaged.
published in some such form as my botany bulletins all your work upon the plants of New Guinea, you will see as being the nearest government botanist to this new colony how necessary it is for me to possess all that is or has been published upon its flora, but the work at present is so scattered that I cannot [even] purchase it,
4
Bailey made similar complaints to the botanists at Kew, suggesting that W. Thiselton-Dyer could help by 'advising that in all instances … in which plants are described by distant botanists, that a copy of such descriptions be sent at the earliest opportunity to the government botanists of the country or colony to which that plant belongs' (F. Bailey to W. Thiselton-Dyer, 29 April 1892, quoted by Clements (1999), p. 195).
and I receive but few specimens of those collected at public expense.
I have lately received a specimen of what may be your could you oblige me with a typical specimen of that species,
5
A specimen, BRI 042581, in the Queensland Herbarium bearing M's Phytologic Museum of Melbourne label has no date of acquisition or collection.
as I have not even the Fragmenta with the diagnosis
6
B67.09.01, p. 22.
— I see a notice in our papers of your birthday let me wish you many happy returns of the day —
Your old friend
F. Manson Bailey