Document information
Physical location:
Letter press copy book 3, p. 141, Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane. 95.07.06
Plant names
-
Eriostemon Nottii
Search for
Eriostemon Nottii
in
Preferred Citation:
Frederick Bailey to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1895-07-06. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1890-6/1895/95-07-06-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
July 6th [189]5
1
editorial addition.
Dear Baron
As I never hear from you I suppose that your time is all taken up. I am obliged to
you for the orchid pamphlet but must say that all such publications should be published
in the colonies. The Australian workers are too much kept in the dark with regard
to the plants of New Guinea.
I should have been better pleased ha[d] [y]ou
published in some such form as my botany bulletins all your work upon the plants
of New Guinea, you will see as being the nearest government botanist to this new colony
how necessary it is for me to possess all that is or has been published upon its flora,
but the work at present is so scattered that I cannot [even] purchase it,
and I receive but few specimens of those collected at public expense.
2
Bailey is referring to a reprint containing papers by Kränzlin that included many
species authored jointly by him and M from the part of New Guinea administered by
Queensland, as well as species collected from the German colonies that were authored
by Kränzlin alone; this is confirmed by a letter from Wilhelm Bäuerlen to Joseph Maiden,
2 July 1895 (MRS 203/4, Inwards correspondence — special bundles, 1886-1921, 95/681 Archives of
the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney) in which Bäuerlen reports receiving a copy of the reprint
from M and mentions species collected by him that are included in the papers, at least
one in Kränzlin (1894) and another in Kränzlin (1895).
3
editorial addition — MS damaged.
4
Bailey made similar complaints to the botanists at Kew, suggesting that W. Thiselton-Dyer
could help by 'advising that in all instances … in which plants are described by distant
botanists, that a copy of such descriptions be sent at the earliest opportunity to
the government botanists of the country or colony to which that plant belongs' (F.
Bailey to W. Thiselton-Dyer, 29 April 1892, quoted by Clements (1999), p. 195).
I have lately received a specimen of what may be your
could you oblige me with a typical specimen of that species,
as I have not even the Fragmenta with the diagnosis
— I see a notice in our papers of your birthday let me wish you many happy returns
of the day —
Eriostemon Nottii
Search for Eriostemon Nottii
in
5
A specimen, BRI 042581, in the Queensland Herbarium bearing M's Phytologic Museum
of Melbourne label has no date of acquisition or collection.
6
B67.09.01, p. 22.
Your old friend
F. Manson Bailey