Document information
Physical location:
MEL 68281, National Herbarium ofVictoria, Royal Botanic GardensMelbourne. 92.00.00fPreferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Georg Luehmann, 1892 [92.00.00f]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/92-00-00f>, accessed September 11, 2025
1
MS attached to the sheet containing a specimen of Darwinia
luehmannii
(MEL 68281). An Elder Exploring Expedition specimen label bears the date 2 November 1891, ’85 miles
n.e x e from Esperance Bay’, and identifies the specimen as ‘Darwinia aff virescens’.
M’s herbarium label identifies the collector as Richard Helms but in the published description by M and R. Tate (B96.14.02), the collection
is attributed to P. A. Gwynne, an assistant on the Elder Expedition.
The MS appears to be a note from M to Luehmann written during the working up of the
botanical results of the Elder Expedition, and detailed notes and drawings, apparently
by Luehmann, comparing this putative new species with
Darwinia meissneri
and
D. virescens, are also attached to the sheet. In the published description, M and Tate state that ‘The species has been dedicated to Mr. G. Luehmann … who in the preliminary examination
of the Helms-collection has on many occasions given valuable aid’.
M and Tate began working up the botanical results of the Elder Expedition in 1892;
see B93.14.08, read by Tate to the Royal Society of SA in December 1892. Their definitive
account, including a description of the new
Darwinia, was expected to be published in the next part of vol. 16 of the Society’s
Transactions
following that published in June 1893, but the Society ran into financial difficulties
and the issue did not appear until 1896 (see B96.14.02). In the meantime, M and Tate did some further
work on the collection; see Tate to M, 12 November 1895 (in this edition as 95-11-12a). Hence M’s note to Luehmann could have been written at any time between 1892 and
March or April 1896. It is dated to 1892 as the earliest it could have been written.
It would be good to draw the staminodes in comparison to those from Helms’s plant,
also from the original of
D. virescens. Are they r
eal
l
y
as wide as drawn on Helms’s plant.
Darwinia virescens