Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1882-90, ff. 331-5. 91.01.21Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1891-01-21. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1890-6/1891/91-01-21-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
21/1/91.
On my return voyage to Melbourne from N. Z.,
dear Sir Joseph, I have the last opportunity quietly to write, and so like to say
a little about my movements in those islands, where at
almost every step
the vegetation reminds of
you!
The universal regret has been, that you could not come personally at this scientific
festival to the scenes of your earliest triumphs. — This year I could less easily
take out a month of my time for absense from my Department, than could likely be done
for twice or thrice that time in any other year. But the duties for getting the new
Central Austr expedition
ready, which is to map for the first time portions of the two blanks, one as great,
the other greater than Britain, call me greedily back, so that the party may be organized
in time, for being at the outskirts of the settlements at the beginning of the cool
season, these two tracts of country being in all likelihood extensively waterless.
Sir Thomas Elder, from whom I had a London telegram last month,
will also be back in a few weeks, so that I must not delay the fitting out of the
new Expedition. It is an outcome of the Melbourne-meeting of the Austr. Assoc., just
as most probably the N. Z. meeting will bring about the getting of the remaining means
for Nordenskiold's contemplated antarctic enterprise, which should tend largely to
increase subsequently the revenue of all the Australian colonies, but particularly
that of N. Z.
I spoke emphatically on the objects of these antarctic plans in the geographic Section,
and must own, that my appeal met with an enthusiastic response, especially as Sir
James Hector and Prof Kernot delivered also vigorous speeches on the subject,
and as Mr Griffith, the President of the geographic Section, made antarctic concerns
the main-subject of his inaugural adress.
As the voyage from Port Phillip to NZ takes one week going and one week coming, and
as the Assoc. meetings required one week more, I had only one week for tours, and
devoted this to a journey into the vicinity of Mt Cook. This left me only one day
for the glaciers,
to be in time for the opening meeting at Christchurch. During that day I crossed the
huge boulders of the Hooker-River, which are overlaying the glacier, and shifted gradually
forward by the huge ice-masses, which press on them from the flank of the alps above.
Vegetation however does not exist among these rock-fragments, as they are slowly moving
and afford therefore no permanent footing to plants. The Hooker-River, where my companions
and myself crossed it under the guidance of Mr Huddlestone is a mile wide and 2500
feet above sea-level; and the aspect of the alps, so close by, is magnificent beyond
description. but on account of the vast extent of icy mountains in long chains the
cold descending currents render at the Hooker-River the vegetation quite alpine, among
other plants the glorious Ranunc. Lyalli being conspicuous. The plains and lower ranges
towards the alps coming from the eastern side are absolutely treeless, and the two
great lakes towards Mt Cook near the Hooker River
are also devoid of any fringe vegetation.
so that I will push your Eucalyptus Gunnii and E. urnigera into this region for embellishing
the landscape and for affording fuel and timber. Many Pines should succeed also there,
but it is too cold for Pinus insignis and Cupressus macrocarpa, the two quickest growing
of Conifers.
1
For the meeting of the Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science held
in Christchurch, January 1891.
2
Elder Scientific Exploring Expedition, 1891-2.
3
Telegram not found.
4
See Home et al. (1992). Nordenskiöld's proposed expedition did not proceed.
5
Neither M's comments, nor those of Hector and Kernot, were published in the report
of the meeting. All three spoke in the context of the presentation of the report of the committee (of
which M was a member) appointed at the previous Congress 'to consider the question
of Antarctic Exploration'; see
Otago daily times, 20 January 1891, p. 2.
6
Griffiths (1891).
7
The Tasman, Hooker and Mueller glaciers near Mt Cook.
8
Lakes Tekapo and Pukaki.
9
and the two great lakes . . . fringe vegetation
is a marginal note with intended position indicated.
Your Handbook
has delt 25 years ago almost exhaustively already with the N. Z. flora, so that I
saw no novelties, unless it is a Viola near V. filicaulis, but more stoloniferous
and with a yellow tinge towards the base of the lowest and the lateral petals. It
was to me however of high interest to notice the varied consociations of plants in
N. Z. and to see those in a living state, which had I had not in cultivation, while
at the bot. Garden.
10
J. Hooker (1864-7).
The presense of Prof Goodall,
the President of the American Assoc. for Advancement of Science at the N. Z. meeting
shed a particular lustre on it, he bringing a greeting across two oceans!
A more genial and generous man, so learned, and yet so modest, can not be imagined.
11
G. Goodale. George Goodale arrived in Adelaide 15 December, and then travelled by train to Melbourne
on a date that has not been found, leaving for New Zealand on 6 January 1891. M left Melbourne for New Zealand on 31 December 1890. In his account of his Melbourne
visit Goodale (1891a), p. 262 wrote 'Not very far from the Garden lives Baron Ferdinand von Mueller, Government Botanist. He is surrounded by his Herbarium and
Library to which he has devoted his life and fortune. The correspondence which he
carries on is incredibly voluminous, and it is understood to be conducted wholly with
his own hand.' It seems likely that this was a report of a conversation rather than
personal observations; Goodale heard a lot about M from other contacts in Australia, reporting that M's 'preëminence receives hearty recognition, even in quarters where
the relations might naturally have been somewhat strained. The willingness with which
the government botanist comes to the assistance of young botanists and amateur collectors
in the colonies may have had much to do with the general interest in botanical matters
exhibited in the three most populous colonies' (p. 264).
12
For Goodale's remarks, see Goodale (1891).
Sir James Hector intended, to take me with others through the North Island, of N.
Z., but my duties call me back to my Department by the end of January.
Ever regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller
It may interest you for the suppl. of the gen. plantarum
that Baillon points out to me the affinity of Macgregoria to Floerkea and Limnanthes
13
No supplement to Bentham & Hooker (1862-83) was published.
14
Baillon's letter not found.
I have no Pachystoma (Apaturia) from Australia (Arnhem's Land)
Sir James Hector kindly offered to take me through the northern Island but I could
not delay my return
Apaturia
Cupressus macrocarpa
E. urnigera
Eucalyptus Gunnii
Floerkea
Limnanthes
Macgregoria
Pachystoma
Pinus insignis
Ranunculus Lyalli
Viola filicaulis