Document information
Physical location:
FNCV 014-034 Archives, Field Naturalists Club of Victoria, Melbourne. 89.08.10Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Arthur Lucas, 1889-08-10. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1880-9/1889/89-08-10-final.odt>, accessed June 15, 2026
10/8/89
Having learnt, dear Prof. Lucas, that some members are eager, to get the name changed
of the Field-Naturalists Club, I think, that I shall not step out of my proper position,
when I advise, that such a change
not
be made. I offer such objections, as occur to this (according to my views) in writing,
as my severe cough does not allow of my going out, particularly at late evening-hours
in this cool season. The very word "Club" implies an union without rigerous ceremonies,
a freer coming together, than in abstract science-societies, as evinced also by the
membership of our Field-Naturalists Club being happily open to Ladies. By the change
of the name, as far as I can see, nothing would be gained for our particular work,
while much to us in our free scientific intercourse and in our unrestrained field-operations
might be lost. I further have heard, that some members of the Club are anxious to
establish
grades
in our union, according to greater or lesser accomplishments and experiences. This
proposition came up formerly in more than one science-society of Australia, but I
gave my advise against such a measure fully thirty years ago. The question in such
case arises, who is to adjudicate? The member, to be raised to a higher grade, can
as regards his merits only be judged by the few, who are engaged in the same speciality,
— whereas the whole of the Club would be voting on such a proposition. But this is
not the gravest ascect
of the question. The danger is of envey and discord being generated, and a harmonious
union, working for a common purpose, being split up into factions. We have already
the power to reward very distinguished workers in the Club with an honorary membership,
which need not be restricted to persons beyond the colony. This seems to me quite
sufficient for an organisation of ours. If still more is demanded and a separation-system
is to be introduced, then the Royal Society offers very considerately for such special
aspirations the best scope among us, without the Candidates for higher grades thereby
being lost to us for united work, the sectional system of the R.S.V.
being exactly what would meet the case.
1
aspect?
2
The Royal Society of Victoria at this period had several special-interest Sections
— including one for microscopy, formed when the Microscopical Society of Victoria
merged with the Royal Society; see Kernot (1888). The Field Naturalists’ Club of Victoria
later also introduced Sections.
Regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller.