Document information
Physical location:
88.02.00cPreferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to William Woolls, 1888-02 [88.02.00c]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1880-9/1888/88-02-00c-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
1
Letter not found. The text given here is from 'Notes and exhibits', Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales
, vol. 13, 1888, p. 337. The note was read at the meeting of the Society held on 29
February 1888.
Jussiaea repens (Linn.) Baron Mueller has recently been engaged in investigating the Australian species
of Jussiaea, and has come to the conclusion that our J. repens (Linn.), is not identical with the Indian species. He inclines rather to refer it
to J. diffusa (Forskael), and as such he proposes to call it in his forthcoming "Key to the Dichotomous
System,"
… but it demands further investigation to ascertain whether this refers to the Australian
or the Indian plant. In order to settle the matter, the Baron is sending specimens
of our plant to Dr. Schwainfurth,
now engaged in scientific pursuits at Cairo, to be compared with the plant growing
in the Nile, which was collected there in 1763, and thus to determine whether our
Jussiaea repens is to be referred to the African J. diffusa, or the Indian plant.
]
2
See B86.04.05, p. 22, and B88.11.02, p. 254, where the species is recorded as Jussieua repens. In B89.05.03, p. 6 he treated J. repens as a synonym of J. diffusa.
3
Schweinfurth; letter not found.
4
Woolls's note continued by appealing to members to collect specimens to help decide
on the possible variation between northern and southern specimens. Notes on other
plants were also read.
Jussiaea diffusa
Jussiaea repens