Document information
Physical location:
85.09.00dPreferred Citation:
the Deniliquin Council to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1885-09 [85.09.00d]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1880-9/1885/85-09-00d-final.odt>, accessed June 17, 2026
1
Letter not found. For the text given here, see 'Correspondence', in the report of
the meeting of the Deniliquin Council held on 14 September 1885,
Pastoral times
(Deniliquin, NSW), 19 September 1885, p. 4. A report in the previous issue of the
paper (
Pastoral times
, 12 September 1885, p. 2) provides more details:
Aqueous Vegetation.— During the last and preceding season some discussion has taken
place respecting the advisability or otherwise of removing the aqueous vegetation which rises to the surface of the
local lagoons at certain periods of the year. Opinions have been divided as to the
necessity of such a proceeding. By some it is held that the vegetation is not detrimental
to the health of those residing in the vicinity of the lagoons, and others aver tthat
it is. At times, when the vegetable matter is decomposing the smell is not particularly
attractive; and the Council has decided to obtain an expert opinion on the point.
Some years ago the matter was skimmed off the lagoon; and by some residents it is
held that the same practice should be followed every year. At the instance of the
Mayor three samples of water from the lagoon have been taken. One was taken from a
spot where the aqueous weeds are in greatest abundance, the second is from where they
do not thrive in such luxuriance, and the third is from a place where there are no
weeds at all. When the weeds are plentiful the water is perfectly clear and colourless;
where they are not so plentiful the water is slightly cloudy; and where there are
no weeds at all the water is of a decidedly milky hue. It is proposed to ask Baron
Von Mueller for an opinion on the subject.
2
For M's reply, see M to A. Jameson, October 1885 (in this edition as 85-10-00f).