24/2/83
By last mail, dear Mr Dyer, I sent a photogram of fruit-amenta of
, also a dried male amentum and some ♂ scales of
; — by this post I hope to be able to send a ♀ amentum of
, as it seems now getting sufficiently dry for packing. The Strobilus intended for
you, has the scales rather less pointed than those, of which the photograms were made.
I trust also that at last I shall have stitched copies for Kew of the Species-Census
of Australian plants.
The writing and printing of the alphabetic Index took more time than I thought, and
now the stitching has caused an other delay.
How is
getting on?
I received with gratitude the copy of the Directorial Report of Kew Gardens for 1882,
though when reading these kinds of Documents "mein Herz blutet"
as a Director in former happier times. The industrial notes are of great interest
again, and will afford me some additional data for a new edition of the select plants.
In regard to our friends Bailey "intimate acquaintance with the Floras of Australia
and New Zealand, acquired by travels and study in the course of a long residence in
the southern hemisphere"
I merely repeat, what I stated in a former letter,
that I never heard of him except as a horticulturist pure and simple during the years
1847-1852, when I met him occasionally at his fathers plant nursery in Adelaide*
when other Gardeners like Wilhelmi C. Stuart, and any one else interested in native
plants then in S.A. were in frequent communication with me on botanic matters; nor
have I ever learnt of Mr B. forming during many years stay in N.Z any botanical collections,
which he might have done yet at a time, when Hector, Haast and Travers made the great
strides for a finishing harvest in the N.Z flora, – before Kirk, Buchanan, Cheeseman
and others.
I have in vain searched for the
slightest indication of any data in any works
, of Mr B. being identified with either the S.A. or N.Z. Flora, and have simply looked
on him as a
Q.L.
Botanist, and could prove by his correspondence, that he was mainly if not solely
as a disciple of mine drawn from the horticultural into his bot. career after he came
to Brisbane.
Mr B. is somewhat audacious in his assertions, which must be taken cum grano salis
even to the extent of passing judg[e]ment
on the grandest botanic institutions in the world, at least in former years. He certainly
even told
me
of his bot. collection made in S.A, as I remember from one of his letters, to which
I demurred. He pretend[ed]
to have sent these collections to
Loddiges
; but when the last of the Loddiges died in 1846, Mr B. was still in his boyhood!
it is a pity, that an otherwise so excellent a man should have such egoistic weaknesses,
and tyro[,] as he
still
is in Botany, try to elevate himself on the expense of those who helped him on and
to whom — perhaps inconsciously — he must therefore give some pain and cause some
discouragement.
I am of course happy to see Mr B. bring out a
QL
synopsis, and given him such information specially for it as he has sought.
Regardfully your
Ferd von Mueller
Regel invited me officially as Juror to St Petersburg,
but I do not intend to meet Garden Directors in Europe, unless I am again their colleague.
I am sending a
there and also to Amsterdam.
I do not think that Mr Bailey travelled botanically in
any
part of Australia except in Q L.
*I was through those years much in town, though I travelled extensively also and had
my landed property, purchased in 1847, 30 miles South of Adelaide)
