Melbourne, 2 May 1882.
The honorable the Chief Secretary.
Sir.
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication of yesterday
accompanied by a sample of poison-herb, which proved detrimental to some pigs at
Caulfield. With a view of ascertaining particulars of the case and inspecting the
locality, I proceeded to Mr T. W. Nicholson's estate, where the poisoning case occurred.
The plant, to which the mischief has to be adscribed is a tall umbelliferous herb,
well known botanically since the last fourty years as
; but altho' this plant is sparsely distributed from Port Phillip through some of
the inland-regions to near the Gulf of Carpentaria
northward and to Swan-River
westward, and also extends to the north of Tasmania, — no record exists, — so far
as I am aware —, of any injury to pastoral animals ever having arisen from this herb;
notwithstanding that the plant abounded about 30 years ago on the now bare sands between
Melbourne and Sandridge,
where stock then used to browse, it actually passing at that time under the treacherous
name of "native Parsnip". — As this Didiscus is fortunately biennial only, it would
become suppressed by preventing it from flowering. — On enquiry I heard at Mr. Nicholson's
place, that a number of half-grown pigs, to which the Didiscus-plant was given, —
(as additional green-feed, under the idea, that it was similar to the Carrot-plant)
— had died in a day or a day and a half, the animals readily devouring the luxuriant
foliage. The symptoms produced were vomiting and purging, which set in some hours
afterwards; but, as far as I can learn, no paralysis was produced For ascertaining
any after-death appearances no dissections were made by Mr Nicholson's people. The
poison seems to have acted so virulently, that a single plant, though only partly
devoured sufficed to cause the death of two pigs. As in this instance we have to do
with an absolutely new kind of poison-plant, which moreover has in various parts of
Australia and even in new Caledonia several congeners of doubtless equally deleterious
property, it will be important to find out, what precise chemical principle operates
so powerfully and so unexpectedly in this innocent-looking herb. With this view I
have placed myself in communication with W. Johnson Esq., the Government analytic
Chemist, who with the facilities at his command has kindly undertaken, to search for
and isolate the poison-principle, as I suspect, that it will turn out to be analogous
to Coniin and Cicutin among the
and therefore a volatile Alkaloid. It is also my intention with the cooperation of
a leading Veterinary Surgeon to investigate the physiologic action of this new vegetable
poison on animals, to trace the post-mortem appearances and thus to devise antidotes;
and more, — as providence does not call forth organisms of any kind without some beneficent
purpose, we may also now obtain a clue, how this new vegetable principle could become
a powerful therapeutic auxiliary perhaps in the hand of physicians, to alleviate or
even subdue human maladies.
I have the honour to be, Sir,
your obedient servant
Ferd. von Mueller.