Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew Correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1871-81, ff. 260-1. 80.03.16Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1880-03-16. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1880-9/1880/80-03-16-final.odt>, accessed May 15, 2026
1
MS annotation: 'JGB' [John Gilbert Baker].
Let me thank you, dear Sir Joseph, for the information on the Cyathea from Dandenong
& Cape Otway,
which species I shall now describe as
C. gracillima
.
It is very close to your C. Cunninghami in some of its characteristics. It is delightful
to contemplate, that your & Mr Benthams "genera"
are progressing so fast. What a boon for all time
that
work to science. You will have no great difficulty of quoting my Eucalyptography,
as it can be cited by the decades, an index of each being given.
2
Letter not found.
3
No publication of
Cyathea gracillima
has been found; is not listed in B89.12.03. Authorship of
C. boylei
from the Dandenong Ranges is attributed to M by Charles French Snr. (C. French (1880-81), p. 33).
4
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83).
You are rather hard on me for my mere suggestion, concerning the claims of Belis; the sound of the word is very different to that of Bellis, Bélis not Bellis.
Kindly consider how freely Bentham disposed of the time-honored Didiscus for Trachymene
without cause, the Dithyrocarpus for the barbarous Floscope
(not even Floriscopa), Myriogyne for the antiquated & unmeaning Centipeda. Yourself
restored Olearia for Eurybia, while J. Mueller set aside (without being censored)
Siphonia, a name known not only to Botanists but to all medical & chemical persons
since the last century — in favor of the forgotten Hevea, and justice seems to me
due quite as much to Salisbury as to Aublet & Loureiro. Your great parent would doubtless
have objected to the renovation of Hevea. I think we should have
one
rule,
& then stand to it without vacillation. Of course I could adduce many other instances
of changes, acquiesced in by A. de Candolle & others, to vindicate what I said about
Belis; but really I am not interested in the subject, so far as
that
genus is concerned.
5
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 3, p. 436 in their entry for Salisbury’s rejected
1807 name
Belis
in favour of
Cunninghamia
(erected 1826); ‘Nomen Saliburyanum a Brownio et Richardio rejectum fuit similiter
sonantem
Bellis, Linn.’ M's 'mere suggestion' has not been identified. See also M to W. Thiselton-Dyer,
10 September 1881.
6
Floscopa?
7
That is, a rule for preferring a generic name where more than one exists in synonymy.
We have a change of Ministry,
here
always a series
matter to any public Department.
8
James Service replaced Graham Berry as Premier on 5 March 1880.
9
serious?
Yours with best regards
Ferd. von Mueller.
The Eucalyptus- & Acacia-seeds of last months mail I have sent, thinking they might
prove of value for experimental culture in the Channel-Islands.
10
The paragraph is written on a separate slip of paper glued under M's signature. See M to J. Hooker, 18 February 1880 (in this edition as 80-02-18b).
Acacia
Belis
Bellis
Centipeda
Cyathea Cunninghami
Cyathea gracillima
Didiscus
Dithyrocarpus
Eucalyptus
Eurybia
Floscope
Hevea
Myriogyne
Olearia
Siphonia
Trachymene