The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: Thursday ¶ ¶ I write this from Gippsland, dear Mr Ramsay, and will return to you the NZ Cyperaceae & Restiaceae so soon as I return. ¶ It is not in my recollection that your letter asked for the ret...

Document information

Physical location:

ML MSS.562, Letters to E. P. Ramsay 1862-91, Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales, Sydney. 78.04.04

Plant names

Cyperaceae
Search for Cyperaceae in
Gentianeae
Search for Gentianeae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Goodenia
Search for Goodenia in
Goodeniaceae
Search for Goodeniaceae in
Leguminosae
Search for Leguminosae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Lobelia
Search for Lobelia in
Myrtaceae
Search for Myrtaceae in
Restiaceae
Search for Restiaceae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Rubiaceae
Search for Rubiaceae in
Solanum nigrum
Search for Solanum nigrum in

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Edward Ramsay, 1878-04-04. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1878/78-04-04-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

Thursday

M left with the Wattle Bark Commissioners for Gippsland on Saturday 30 March (Argus , 8 April, p. 6, and 30 March 1878, p. 7), returning to Melbourne on Friday 12 April (Argus, 13 April 1878, p. 7). The letter is dated to 4 April because it is unlikely that on the day before M reached Melbourne, he would have written ‘as soon as I return’. On Thursday 4 April the Commissioners went by boat from Lakes Entrance to the Tambo River, where they slept overnight on board before holding a hearing in Bairnsdale the following day (Argus, 8 April 1878, p. 6).

I write this from Gippsland, dear Mr Ramsay, and will return to you the NZ & so soon as I return.

M to E. Ramsay, 14 April 1878 (in this edition as 78-04-14c), announced that he would now be able to return the NZ plants, but in M to E. Ramsay, 21 April 1878, reported that they could not be found.

It is not in my recollection that your letter asked for the return of the specimens, and as they were unnumbered, I thought dublicates were kept. To me they are of no value, as I have a full & large NZ Herbarium.

It is delightful to be able to look forward to N.G. plants through your circumspectness and generosity. I like so much to issue a second volume on Papuan plants,

The last part of vol. 1 was B77.13.02; the first part of vol. 2 was B85.06.03.

and Dr Beccari has promised me all his , & .

With regardful remembrance

Ferd. von Mueller

Did you see ever any Bamboos in the N, not merely the common Reed, and if so, did you notice it in flower, and where?

I have never yet heard of any proving poisonous, and have classed their bitter principle as allied to that of the , to which order the are closely allied. If really poisonous principles exist in the goodeniaceous plants, then it should be carefully investigated by chemical analysis & toxicologic experiments It is however far more likely that some s or perhaps or some other well recognized poison-plant killed the cattle of Liverpool plains.

Do you think some subscribers among medical & pharmaceutical Gentlemen could be secured in N.S.W. for the work mentioned in the bye-following prospectus. It will be fully printed in a few month, most of it being in type. It will cost me about £300 (i.e. the savings of several years!) and as yet only about £40 are covered by subscription.

Prospectus not found. The work referred to is Wittstein (1878), i.e. B78.06.09.