The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: 15/3/78. ¶ ¶ I like to ask from you several items of information, dear Mr Bailey, if at some leisure-hour you can oblige me. I wish much to know what all your tanners use of the various Q. L. ¶ bark...

Document information

Physical location:

ML MSS B202, Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales, Sydney. 78.03.15b

Plant names

Acacia
Search for Acacia in
Eucalyptus brachypoda
Search for Eucalyptus brachypoda in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eucalyptus microtheca
Search for Eucalyptus microtheca in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eucalyptus rudis
Search for Eucalyptus rudis in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Melaleuca Leucadendron
Search for Melaleuca Leucadendron in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Melaleuca styphelioides
Search for Melaleuca styphelioides in
Pittosporum bicolor
Search for Pittosporum bicolor in

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Frederick Bailey, 1878-03-15 [78.03.15b]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1878/78-03-15b-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

15/3/78.

I like to ask from you several items of information, dear Mr Bailey, if at some leisure-hour you can oblige me. I wish much to know what all your tanners use of the various Q. L.

Qld.

barks. Perhaps many s have never been tried.

M was a member of the Wattle Bark Board of Inquiry appointed by the Victorian Government in January 1878; see B78.14.01.

Have you further any means of obtaining information on the geologic areas to which certain Eucalypts are restricted in Queensland?

I have recently made some additions to my "select plants" from the Queensland Exhib. Catalogue,

National Agricultural and Industrial Association of Queensland (1876)?

which you fortunately revised. I am however not sure, whether with the means at your disposal you could safely identify all the species enumerated there. Thus I have the gravest doubts, that extends to your colony. I suppose, you saw specimens of Melal. styphelioides, the remarks about it in the Catalogue being highly interesting. Which other Melaleucas form trees with you in salt swamps? except M. Leucadendron.

It would be unfair towards to you, to expect, that every Eucalypt should be known to you there, when you have no authentic specimens to compare, and when you have only Bentham's writing about them, in which are many errors . Thus he confuses even the West Austral. Euc brachypoda (with simple axile umbels) with Euc microtheca, whose infloresc. is terminal & paniculate.

Bentham (1863-78), vol. 3, p. 223.

Thus for the QL species the name microtheca must be restored. So he has made many other erro[rs]

editorial addition — word partly obscured by guard paper.

apt to mislead you. The true E brachypoda is merely a small-flower[ing]

editorial addition — word partly obscured by guard paper.

state of E. rudis, notwithstanding of both being placed 21 pages apart! This shows the necessity for the Atlas

i.e. M's Eucalyptographia (B79.13.11 etc.).

but the proposition made by Mr Bernays can not be carried out, as I have no fund to issue the Q. L. species here, though copies might afterwards be purchased in Q.L. The first outlay to draftsman & printer is the stumbling block.

Regardfully your

Ferd. von Mueller