Document information
Physical location:
75.08.02aPreferred Citation:
[Edward Schneider] to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1875-08-02 [75.08.02a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1875/75-08-02a-final.odt>, accessed June 16, 2026
1
Telegram not found. The text given here is from Daily telegraph (Melbourne), 3 August 1875, p. 4; the story was subsequently reprinted in Ballarat courier, 4 August 1875, p. 2, and Brisbane courier, 13 August 1875, p. 3. The sender is identified as 'Mr Edward Schmidt, of Tambo, on
the Barcoo, Queensland'; his name is corrected elsewhere in the article. The text
is introduced with the following information: ‘The message is somewhat ambiguous,
but it is supposed that some of the missing explorer’s instruments and writings have
been found. The telegram is dated August 2, and is as follows:’.
Receipt of the telegram ‘announcing the discovery of remains which, if not those of
Leichhardt, are probably those of some of his party’ was also reported in the Leader (Melbourne), 7 August 1875, in an item about Leichhardt. The same item was also published
in the Northern Territory times and gazette, 16 October 1875. The item continued:
The most curious part of the affair is that these remains have been found in the south,
while previous indications in the shape of marked trees, have been discovered as far
north as 400 miles from the Barcoo River. It is of course possible that the party
were on their return march, after having pushed as far as their resources would permit
them, and if this be really the case, and there are papers found with the bleached
bones of the gallant explorers, we shall presently have added an interesting chapter
to Australian history.
The comments about the location of the supposed find were repeated in Daily telegraph (Melbourne), 9 August 1875, p. 4, col. a.
2
See also [E. Schneider] to M, 3 August 1875, and [E. Schneider] to M, 10 August 1875. The report appears to have been a hoax with the perpetrator making use of Schneider’s
name.