Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M51, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 74.03.01

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Charles Prentice to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1874-03-01. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1874/74-03-01-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

1
MS found with specimen of (MEL 114584).
March 1. 1874
Brisbane
Dear Baron.
Many thanks for the scrap of , which I have not seen in this neighbourhood; have you a similar scrap of ? I had one of the genus among my European grasses, but these & many books were parted with, when I left England — I went through all the Australian grasses in Mr Browns herbarium in 1869,
2
The Australian collections of Robert Brown (1773-1858) were at the British Museum.
but the genus Andropogon was imperfect, both there, in the general Museum Coll. & at Kew; , was not in any of them I think; the Museum herbarium is woefully imperfect except perhaps in , Mr Browns favourite family, and they seem massed in Western Australia, where creative activity must have been at one time marvellously developed.
Dr Hooker's election to the Pr R. S.
3
President of the Royal Society, London.
was decided by other than scientific reasons I think; it is of course indispensable that any person holding the position should be willing & able to play the Amphytrion; & there was no doubt a further desire to vindicate him against Mr Ayrton's insolence,
4
See MacLeod (1974).
which culminated in calling him a 'market gardener'. In Newton's time the scientific reasons would be paramount, though even in his case, the large house in Leicester sq.
5
London.
which he inhabited was well able to receive guests, and while he was Master of the Mint he almost ceased his scientific inquiries.
How came you to let Mr Bentham unite in print Tamarindus indic us , and make masculine throughout, while the correct feminine termination is preserved in &c?: the reviews don't meddle with botanical works now as they did when the Edinburgh criticised Mr Browns curious mistakes in the Prodromus when it appeared in 1810.
6
Britten (1907) shows that the view that Brown received criticism for 'his latinity' in the Edinburgh review was based on a comment in an obituary by C. Martius (1859), p. 324, but is false: 'Mr Daydon Jackson has examined not only the Edinburgh but the other reviews of the period, and has found no notice of the Prodromus in any of them'.
I enclose a single frond of an Asplenium, closely allied to A. attenuatum,
7
The only Asplenium specimen submitted by Prentice surviving in MEL is var. attenuatum, MEL 114584, from Brisbane, collected in 1874.
which grows in a single Logan
8
Near Brisbane.
locality, in dense shade & rooting proliferously; you may have received it from others, but this locality is known only to my self; I gave Mr Bailey a frond or two as he requested & he may have sent it to you: it is near apparently to A. paleaceum, but seems different, particularly in the narrow lanceate frond, and the long [caudate terminitiva]. A. attenuatum is common in the same district.
My example with leaves of grew in a mess of wet charcoal, and may owe its leaves to the manuring in stimulating properties of the charred wood; perhaps Mr Fitzgeralds may have been similarly circumstanced: it is very abundant this year.
Yours sincerely
Chas: Prentice
I have noticed lately what looks like a pubescent , growing in wet or rather damp black soil, and which seems very local. I will enclose an example if I can find one suitable — also an Acacia
9
The only Acacia specimen submitted by Prentice surviving in MEL is Acacia fimbriata, MEL 2075469, from Brisbane, collected in 1874.
which I formerly referred to A. linifolia , but differs in the torulose pod, & the drooping branches. Nor can I after the utmost care safely refer it to any in the second vol. of the Fl. Australiensis,
10
Bentham (1863-78), vol. 2.
though it partakes of the character of several, the flowers are very fragrant like those of suaveolens; it is a tall shrub, and decidedly local, while A. linifolia is common in several places, always however near the river banks, which this does not frequent.
There is a form too of , which I suppose is referable to the var. tenuis, but looks distinct enough from the common var. in the much smaller flowers, & […] foliage, differing as much as differs from .