Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1871-81, ff. 125-8. 73.11.06Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1873-11-06. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1873/73-11-06-final.odt>, accessed June 9, 2026
Private
1
Each sheet is so headed, but later headings are not transcribed.
Melbourne
6/11/73.
I felt sure, dear Dr Hooker, that you would support my view of declining on principle
a transfer of my services to the University, even if a vacancy had occurred, which
was not the case, and even if my pulmonary suffering did not prevent me from entering
on any regular course of lectures.
I thought it also my duty to the Directors, whose colleague I have been so long,
not to set a dangerous precedent. Your emphatic approval of my refusing to be tossed
about from place to place, gives me a great moral support, as I can mention to influential
friends here your views with every propriety.
That you with your great friends will come to the rescue, inspires me with new hope
for the future! Indeed I stand in need of that rescue in my undeserved persecution,
which indeed is utterly without example. Of course my feelings, which are naturally
those of generosity and kindness, have become at last so embittered that I am hardly
able to control my expressions and actions [now].
2
See M to J. Hooker, 16 June 1873.
3
Hooker's letter, to which M is apparently referring, has not been found.
Under the late Mr Haines, the late Mr Nicholson, Mr OShanassy and the late Mr Heales
I was treated for more than a dozen of years as Director with every consideration
and was fairly though never lavishly supported. My intercourse with all these ministers
was of the most pleasing & friendly kind! So it is not
my
fault if I cannnot get on now.
But after that my carreer has been marred here more or less by every one of my ministerial
Chiefs through withholding the most modest but necessary means by their listening
to ignorant and low men on the Argus and one or 2 other papers, by their taking not
the slightest pain to acquaint themselves with my work and my requirements. Finally
I was starved out at the Garden, and as I held still on, hoping for better time, I
was ejected at a months notice, to make place for the utter unscientific cousin
of the wife of the Minister of the Department. Then even no means were left me to
carry on the branch of Gov Botanist, even if it was not highly derogatory to hold
such an office without being held worthy to administrate the bot Garden, which in
reality is the place and the organisation, in which my researches in any Direction
are to obtain vitality.
4
My intercourse ... get on now, is a marginal note with its intended position indicated by an asterisk.
5
William Guilfoyle.
Since I last wrote the usual "additional estimates" came before the Parliament I applied for what was needed, without the slightest allusion to anything partaining
of the bot Garden. You are aware, that I had only £300 granted working expenses for
my whole responsible and multifarious Departmental services, beyond my modest salary.
Bear kindly in mind, that this is a very expensive country (not in all, but in most
things). — So I applied for a collector £150, a laboratory operator £150, for Benthams
subsidy £100; for a messenger and outdoor agent (consignments, freights &c) £120,
for books and instruments, something, orphan-labor, an office room, a place for the
physical necessities of life, (not even such is left me and my clerk), also for the
purchase of additional Museum collections, for extension of the Museum Building (it
being only one overcrowded room, to which nothing is added since 14 years! Of all
these reasonable requests only the one concerning the item of £100 for Mr Bentham
was granted by the Ministry, or rather Mr Francis,
our
present Prime Minister, while the other 78 members of the Lower House with 1 or 2
excepted would all as cheerfully have voted thousands of £ for me, as the[y]
did
vote £1300 last week on the additional estimates for the working of the Observatory,
that institution having had granted already £2400 working expenses for this financial
year, irrespective of the Directors Salary and irrespective of his and his many Assistants
free quarters. You will see, therefore, my dear Dr Hooker, that it is intended willingly
and studiously to starve me out of the remaining part of my official position, to
put me down,
and to render any real progress of my work and any extensive utility of my labors
an utter impossibility. This is my impression, and there is not a single fact, which
leads redeemingly to other conclusions.
If I had ever been a political agitator or had committed a single bad act, I could
understand this; but as it is — I can’t, unless because I am of teutonic extraction,
though I lived several years longer in Australia than all my life in Europe. The revenue
is overflowing. This week many thousands £ defraudations and embezzlements in the
Lands Department, extending over a long time, came to light; but the principle permanent
officer
spends largely his time, instead of looking after his proper duties, to lay out Gardens
& Parks of the City and has swallowed up as a Chief over the new Curator also the
bot Garden, its conservatories &c. altho his knowledge of plants consists in having
mastered a
few
names of trees, which he first saw at the bot Garden or got from the Nurserymen
6
Clement Hodgkinson.
It is my duty towards myself to explain all this, otherwise you would form but a poor
judgement of your former colleague. You must also remember, that we have universal
suffrage, that everybody votes at 21 and upwards, that a few
hundred
voters form a constituency, that we have
payment
of members &c. Many of the members are not in affluent circumstances, and what operated
much against me
this
year was the fact, that any rupture in Parliament would have caused a dissolution
of the House, whose triennium expires next year, and thus the Members would sit only
2½ instead of 3 years. It is needless to assure you, that I gladly would turn my back
upon the colony, but I cannot leave my 34 years collections of plants behind in the
very midst of my work. I must yet try to shed additional light on the plants of Central
and tropical Australia and must see the Monocotyledoneae through with Mr Benthams
aid.
I could of course never think of taking office elsewhere at my age, and with the prospect
of being treated just in the same manner after a few years at an other place. For
any other position elsewhere of course a younger man or a local man is working up.
I would become an interloper on him. I asked for a modest pension after 22 years service
but it was refused.
It would have been only the interest of a private fortune sunk by me into the Department.
I could of course only accept a pension by being allowed the Honorary Direction of
the Museum & Library and by being the Administrator of such fund as for the Museum
& Publications may still be voted.
7
See M to J. Francis, 18 June 1873.
On one point, emanating from your very generous and noble letter,
dear Dr Hooker, I must be allowed to differ with you. It is your idea, that you would
perhaps
be glad to have nothing to do with Kew Garden, if you could securely continue your
literary work. I am not altogether surprised at this view of yours, preceiving that
it was the view on the spur of a moment. But having long and carefully meditated on
this
subject, I cannot but warn you of the great danger of enunciating this idea. You would
find yourself hampered at all sides. You could no longer order a single thing about
the most valuable & rare culture plants. You might be hindered proper access for study.
You would be sure to be foiled on any attempt to order upon any thing. You would
not save time
, but would waste it in circumlocution and jealous hinderances and in want of means.
Your votes would be seized on; indeed you could no longer go to the Garden without
pain. No! my dear Dr Hooker, remain generalissimus, but keep
good
&
faithful
officers under you; then your administration will be easy & fruitful; not otherwise.
You want an hours daily exercise and that hour is quite sufficient for your giving
your orders as a Horticultural Director. What interest could it be to you to bring
through correspondents new plants, new seeds &c into England, unless you could keep
them under your own control.
8
Letter not found.
9
On 14 August 1873 Hooker wrote to H. Barkly: 'Last night I heard from Mueller, that
they had taken the Garden from him — I am deeply sorry for him, though I am sure it
is for the best; he loaded himself with duties scarcely germane to his post, and which
no human head could effectively administer on the scale he attempted. He is after
all uncommonly well off, with his full salary, and collections and Library, a Museum
Keeper, Clerk, and house rent, and all day long for Science! I am sure I would jump
at such a post here, for the Garden is a very onerous duty, in its Public aspect most
especially. Lord Canterbury spent the other evening here, and told me of the moral
certainty of Mueller losing the Garden. I only hope that they will appoint a Gardener
with some love of plants for their own sakes to it.' (RBG Kew, Letters from Joseph
Hooker vol. 1, Ada-Bar, ff. 207-9.[typescript carbon copy of unknown provenance]):
Barkly replied, 30 November 1873, agreeing that 'the best thing for [M] is to have
nothing to do with the gardening department' (RBG Kew, Director's letters, South African
letters, A-G 1865—1900. ff. 188-9).
You might see Mr Michie about me, the present Victorian Agent General. He did for
years show himself kindly to me, but as he was Attorney General to the last M'Culloch
Ministry, his good feelings were for a time (he being misled) alienated from me. The
step however you propose is kind &
good
! It was not instigated by me. It will bring men in power here to shame.
As yet I have no assurance, that the Library will be left me, though the correspondence
on the subject
came to a stand still, but it may be brought to a climax after a few weeks, when
Parliament is to be dissolved or rather expires. Whether I am to be provided for again
on the estimates I do not know. Perhaps not! I have sold everything off, to keep on
with my service. I keep two people on my
private
expense for Departmental duties, pay for Office rent, House rent &c. But what can
I do in this expensive country with £300! as the whole working expense of a Department!
You might kindly see not only the hon Mr Michie, but also Lord Canterbury, and some
means might be devised then to bring
European
Influence to bear not merely on the paltry financial question, but on that of professional
honor & position particularly.
10
See M to J. Francis, 7 September 1873.
Always Your
Ferd von Mueller
Sir Hercules Robinson is here on a visit; though 17 years in correspondence with him
I am ashamed to show myself before him, after I am driven out of the Directorship.
Could you kindly give me an estimate of your annual
Museum
expense altogether, including building, prints, light[,] paper, [tons] fuel, books,
journals, clerks, Assistants &c, freights, travelling expenses, postage, stationary
With £300 Salary at the bot Garden I could do more than with £800 out of it. My impression
is, that the increase was [merely] given, in order to be able to have some excuse
to fall back on though my ruin was inflicted
11
A newspaper cutting is pasted onto Folio 129, but no source is indicated. The item
reads: 'Baron von Mueller has hardly left the Botanic Garden when he is missed. At
the meeting of the Ballarat Farmers' Club on Saturday last, one of its leading members,
Mr. Bacchus, complained that he was now refused the assistance in test culture, which
used to be so willingly given. Baron von Mueller introduced a large number of plants
for scientific and commercial purposes, fodder plants, medicinal plants etc., and
when he had a sufficient number on hand he was accustomed to distribute specimens
to persons whom he could rely upon taking an interest in their development. In his
day a portion of the ground was set apart for the growth of new hedge shrubs, oil
and textile plants, specimens of grasses and fodder herbs, plants for dyeing, etc.
Some of the specimens Mr. Bacchus received from the Baron last year died off, and
on applying for others he was politely informed, it seems, that that sort of thing
was to be discontinued. The gentleman himself is disgusted, and his Farmers' Club
is indignant, and now that the mischief has been done, we are likely to have a protest
against the present idea of spending many thousands per annum at our central botanic
garden upon geraniums, pansies, and sweet williams, in order that nursemaids may exclaim
"How pretty!" Very likely it would have been well to allow Baron von Mueller anoher
[printer's error] £1,000 per annum in order to beautify the grounds, but the course
taken has been to sacrifice the useful purpose of the institution, and to convert
a botanic garden into mere pleasuregrounds. Instead of an institution which should
instruct as well as delight, we are to have a cockney tea garden without the tea.
When they have rooted up the imported plants, the new managers will doubtless put
cockle-shells round the beds. Instead of the shrubs of commerce which would enrich
the land as well as adorn it, they will let us have a monkey and a fountain. Then
the transformation will be complete.'