Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew Correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1871-81, f. 74. 73.02.25a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1873-02-25 [73.02.25a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1873/73-02-25a-final.odt>, accessed May 15, 2026

The Hampshire brings the
Mononcotyledoneae

Search for Mononcotyledoneae in

with inferior fruits except
Orchideae

Search for Orchideae in

1
The Hampshire … except
Orchideae

Search for Orchideae in

is written to the left of the address.
Melbourne bot Garden
25/2/73
This mail brings you, dear Dr Hooker, a parcel with 87 species of seeds of our hardier plants for Mr Wallaces intended trial cultures.
2
See M to A. R. Wallace, 28 February 1873.
There are others species equally hardy or more so, but I have no seeds as for some months past the seedsman (like the messenger and the only Museum amanuensis,) are working as labourers in the bot. Garden to help keep the plants alive in the hot season, after the number of ten gardeners became reduced to three! A triumph achieved by some of Edw. Wilsons employees!!
It would be advisable not to risk the sowing all on one spot. It might be done likewise in the Skilly Isl
3
Isles of Scilly, Cornwall?
and in the Channel Islands.
I hear just now, that Mr Edw Wilson is likely to loose again the sight of the eye on which for cataract was operated; so he will have to undergo operation on the other eye, with perhaps some misgivings. It is very sad for such an active and intelligent man. At all events he is blessed with monetary fortune to keep him in comfort under such afflictions.
I have read your able defense against Owen so also Benthams. How extraordinar that he should not even know when R Brown's prodromus was published!
4
See Nature, vol. 6, pp. 516-17 (24 October 1872), under the heading ‘Dr. Hooker's reply to Prof. Owen’, in which Hooker commented on Owen's statement addressed to Ayrton (see MacLeod (1974)). See also a letter in response from Owen headed ‘The National Herbarium’ (vol. 7, pp. 5- 7 (7 November 1872)) and Bentham's letter headed ‘Our National Herbarium’ (vol. 7, p. 26 (14 November 1872)), in which Bentham pointed out that it was unreasonable for Owen to claim R. Brown (1810) as an example of 'scientific work at the London Herbarium', as it was published 'many years before the so-called "London Herbarium" was in existence'.
A very great oversight has occurred. In sending off about a month ago by the Hampshire the two cases, one for Bentham, and one for Kew, I omitted to send an order for delivery by the Ship. Every mortal thing after eve[n] so many years instruction I must always on each occasion arrange anew myself, and thus the mail of the Ship was closed before intimation of this sending could be given by letter. Moreover I have no bill of loading ; thus the enclosed note
5
Note not found.
will be the first intimation to you for obtaining the sending. The Hampshire has likely arrived already when this letter comes to you.
Regardfully Ferd von Mueller.