Document information
Physical location:
H72/16703, unit 750, VPRS 44/P inward registered and unregistered correspondence, VA 538 Department of Crown Lands and Survey, Public Record Office, Victoria. 72.08.05Preferred Citation:
Charles French to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1872-08-05. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1872/72-08-05-final.odt>, accessed June 10, 2026
1
Enclosed with M to J. Casey, 6 August 1872.
5/8/72
Baron Von Mueller
Sir,
Having observed a paragraph in the Age newspaper of the 3d of this month (and which
I have enclosed)
containing certain remarks concerning the planting of the grounds at the Industrial
Schools Sunbury, I thought that as I was sent up to that place by your instruction,
it might not be thought out of place by you to mention to you the probable causes
of the many failures that have taken place, and at the same time to mention the particular
kinds of trees that appear to have thriven better than others. In the first place
on going around the grounds with the Superintendent Mr Scott, I at once noticed the
general sickly appearance of all Coniferae excepting perhaps Pinus insignis. P. Massoniana
Cupressus Macrocarpa, Lindley's torulosa & Bentham's, whereas P. [Deodora], pinasta,
Halleppensis,
excelsa, and several other good species were mere shrubby bushes. The Mexican Oaks
and in fact all the Oaks seemed to be quite stunted. Blue Gums seemed to do well,
but a number has been broken by the Cattle and the remainder were covered with the
larvae of a Lepidopterus insect, but I think that with proper care they would do well.
Another drawback seemed to me to be that the children (so I was informed) had broken
off by pinching the leading shoots of a large number of the Coniferae which alone
would tend to retard their growth, further that instead of Brush being used for shelter
stones had been substituted and in the Summer time the radiation of the sun upon the
stones could be almost sufficient in itself to destroy any plant and to which circumstance
I drew the attention of the Superintendent at the time of my visit. Another cause
which is still more formidable was the announcement that
Brackish Water
was used in the watering during the Summer months and when injudiciously applied,
as would be likely as the boys I was informed done the watering, would without a doubt
be sufficient to account for the non success of the whole planting affair. The very
bleak & exposed situation would of course have to be considered as I noticed that those plants on the sheltered side
of the hill certainly looked better than those facing the S.W. & N.W. winds — and
as I believe I am right in saying that the greater plants sent from here were in pots
— but as I did not see the plants that were sent previously to my being at Sunbury
I am not in a position to say any more as regards them. On the other hand I know that
such plants as were selected by me under your instructions since that time were of
the most suitable kinds and were selected with care & judgement and were of the kinds
that were found by me to be doing well at Sunbury. I may also mention that the System
adopted there of sinking holes for plants in almost solid rock is to be condemned,
and I think it is unnecessary to look for more causes than those I have mentioned
to you above, to account for the failure. I should not have brought the matter before
your notice again had I not seen the enclosed paragraph, and which is in my opinion
derogatory to the department, yourself & me.
2
A newspaper clipping is pinned to the letter: 'We understand the whole, or nearly
the whole of the trees planted out by Dr. Mueller on the Sunbury Industrial School
ground have died, and Mr. [William] Ferguson has received instructions from the Chief Secretary to purchase a sufficient
number of trees suitable for the locality, and to undertake the supervision of the
planting himself.' (Age, 3 August 1872, p. 4).
3
Pinus pinaster?
4
Pinus halepensis?
I have the honor to be —
Your Obedient Servant
Chas French
5
Charles Fench Snr. MS annotation in an unknown hand, 13 August 1872: 'noted by President'
[i.e. J. Casey, President of the Board of Lands and Works].
Coniferae
Cupressus Macrocarpa
Cupressus torulosa
Pinus Deodora
Pinus excelsa
Pinus Halleppensis
Pinus insignis
Pinus Massoniana
Pinus pinasta