Document information
Physical location:
W70/5775, unit 468, VPRS 3991/P inward registered correspondence, VA 475 Chief Secretary's Department, Public Record Office, Victoria. 70.05.31Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to James McCulloch, 1870-05-31. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1870-9/1870/70-05-31-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
Melbourne bot. Garden,
31/5/70
Sir
In reply to a letter from the Undersecretary under yesterdays date
I have the honor to inform you, that any plants supplied to private grounds were given
under rules 3 and six of the adjoined regulations.
1
W. Odgers to M, 30 May 1870.
2
The regulations governing 'Distribution of plants, etc., from the Melbourne Botanic
Gardens', dated 29 September 1862, included, 3. 'Donors, or gentlemen who have rendered
services to the Botanic Garden, may, on their special request, be supplied in a proportion
not exceeding the approximate value of their contribution, or in a ratio approximate
to the service rendered, with plants, cuttings, seeds, or cut flowers, but cannot
obtain plants of the ordinary kinds of florists' flowers, or pines, avenue and fruit
trees, from the garden.' 6. 'Plants or seeds of any species promising to be of extensive
utility to the colony, may, when available, be distributed in small quantities to
private gardens, without restrictions.'
I have the honor to be,
Sir, your obed. servant
Ferd. von Mueller,
Direct. botan. Garden
The honorable the Chief Secretary
3
MS annotation by McCulloch, 3 June 1870: 'To be considered with the Memorial from
the Nurseryman'.
On 1 June 1870 Thomas Lang forwarded a memorial on behalf of a number of nurserymen
to the Chief Secretary: 'That the Subscribers have devoted their time, their energy,
and their Capital to the carrying out in this Colony of a useful business: | that
the successful prosecution of their business has, for some years past, been much interfered
with by the annual distribution of plants from the Botanic Garden to Public Institutions
and others free of expense: | that hundreds of thousands of plants are thus distributed
from the State Gardens annually: | that such a practise does not exist in the Public
State Gardens of Great Britain, or the Continent of Europe, or in any of the other
Australian Colonies: | that if such a system did prevail there or elsewhere they respectfully
submit that there is no necessity for following a bad precedent, and thereby doing
an injustice to those engaged in this particular business: | that the Subscribers
consider it is unjust that their business, and theirs alone, should be selected by
the Government for this peculiar interference | that in consequence of the valuable
national results and benefits arising from the development and extension of their
business, they would expect encouragement from the Government of the country rather
than what must be called an unfair opposition: | that the nurserymen profess to be
able to supply plants at a much cheaper rate than they can be grown in the Government
Gardens: | that they believe that it would be a positive saving to the State if the
money thus spent on the State Nursery was distributed amongst the public institutions
as a Grant for Plants; | that the Public Institutions would then receive more value
for the money by buying from the nurserymen: | that this free distribution of plants
stands in the way of the continued successful prosecution of the Nursery Business;
that it checks enterprise: for the nurserymen have already experienced that any extraordinary
effort on their part to introduce large quantities of plants valuable to the community,
have been thwarted by the free distribution of the very plants, which were being introduced
by them: and they know not but that similar results would follow their future attempts:
| that the nurserymen do not claim any privilege for themselves, but merely to be
put on the same footing as all other people engaged in business in this country: |
that Public Institutions have to buy and pay for all other goods required by them,
and the nurserymen do not see the reasonableness of the Government supplying free
those articles of merchandise which it is the special business of the nurserymen to
provide: | that the Subscribers respectfully request the Government to reconsider
the present system of free distribution of plants with a view to remedy the injustice
of which the Memorialists complain'. The memorial was signed by: William Taylor, Joseph
Harris, George Brunning, John Charles Cole, Nathaniel Ronalds, James Scott, B & S
Johnson, Wm Adamson, Law Somner & Co, Daniel B Roulton, Thomas Lang & Co, Taylor &
Sangster, Grant & Cameron, George C. Reynolds, David Noyes, C. F. Creswell, R. W.
Nichols & co of Ballarat p. T.L., George Smith of Ballarat p. T.L., Francis Moss of
Buninyong p. T.L. (V70/5901, unit 468, VPRS 3991, Public Record Office, Victoria).
On 9 June 1870, the Undersecretary, W. Odgers, wrote to Lang, saying that the Chief
Secretary would receive a deputation of nurserymen on the following Monday afternoon,
i.e. 13 June (No. 1405, unit 20, p. 163, VPRS 1187 outward correspondence, VA 475
Chief Secretary's Department, Public Record Office, Victoria).
W. Odgers to M, 15 June 1870 asked for suggestions for modification of the regulations. As M asked for clarification about retrospectivity in M to J. McCulloch, 13 June 1870
(in this edition as 70-06-13a) it appears that possible new regulations had been discussed on 13 June, either with the deputation, where M was present (Argus, 14 June 1870, p. 4), or privately with McCulloch.