Document information
Physical location:
Unit 21, VPRS 1096 inward correspondence, VA 466 Governor, Public Record Office, Victoria. 66.11.23Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Henry Manners-Sutton, 1866-11-23. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1866/66-11-23-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
1
For a copy of this letter see National Archives, London, CO 309/80, original correspondence,
Victoria, despatches, 1866, September to December, enclosure to despatch no. 39, pp.
321-2.
23. Nov. 1866.
Sir Henry
I venture to submit to your Excellency some small samples of paper prepared from indigenous
vegetable substances in the laboratory of my department. Though I am aware of the
enlightened interest evinced by your Excellency in the resources of this country,
I should have refrained from approaching with these results formally, had not his
Grace the Duke of Newcastle some years ago desired, that investigations should be
made in this colony into the adaptation of any extensively available fibrous substances
adapted for the manufacture of paper.
Since the expression of the wish of his Grace I have instituted a variety of experiments
in the direction indicated, and having recently been able to construct a laboratory
and the needful apparatus for the manufacture of commercial or technological articles
from vegetable rawmaterial, I have both for the Intercolonial and Paris Exhibition
a series of such articles prepared, as are likely to give extensive employment to
our population and to add to the wealth of the country. Among these articles are paper
of various kinds, for which in the bark of our Eucalyptus trees or in some fibrous
sedges and grasses abundantly occurring, not only in this but also in the other Australian
Colonies actually millions of tons of raw material are acccessible. The samples submitted
are not bleached, nor elaborately prepared, nor saturated with any substance adding
to their firmness, it being in this instance merely necessary to show in a simple
form the nature of the crude paper obtainable from the pulp of native fibres. The
Society of arts
and other authorities conversant with technological industries would at once be able
to pronounce even from rough specimens such as with very limited appliances are prepared
on this occasion, how far the admixture of such fibres would aid the manufacture of
papers from rags or how far an importation of such fibrous substances could be effected
in the manner of the Esparto of Spain. There can however not be the slightest doubt,
I venture to affirm, that the fibres used on this occasion and many others on which
I intend to report more fully, could here locally be turned to the greatest advantage
for the fabrication of all the rougher kinds of papers. It has also been my aim to
point out, how very many poor families might find locations of prosperity in the wide
tracts of our salubrious but as yet unoccupied ranges by devoting their attention
and their labour for the object of procuring the raw material so vastly available
for manufactures, not merely such as those of paper, but also of tars, acetic acid,
oils, dye-material and other substances constantly needed for arts and industry. In
this sense I was laboring, when I prepared for the exhibition now the series of tars
&c of such trees as now for many thousands of squaremiles occupy perfectly uninhabited
tracts of the country, and I was gratified to observe, that the results in regard
to yield and quality obtained by these experiments are most encouraging, and are likley
to indicate paths of prosperity for numerous inhabitants of these fine tracts of her
Majestys Australian great territory.
2
B61.14.03.
3
Intercolonial Exhibition of Australasia, Melbourne, 1866-7; Exposition Universelle,
Paris, 1867.
4
Society instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce.
I have the honor to remain your Excellencys profoundly obedient servant
Ferd. Mueller,
M.D., F.R.S.
His Excellency the honorable Sir Henry Manners-Sutton., K.C.B.,
Governor of Victoria &c &c &c
5
Manners-Sutton transmitted a copy of this letter as an enclosure to Despatch 39 of
18 December 1866, commenting that he was 'incompetent to form an opinion with respect
to the quality of the materials', or on the likely success of manufacture. He thought
it probable that 'some special notice ... will be taken in the awards of the Jurors,
or in the reports of the Sub Committees' of the specimens displayed at the Intercolonial
Exhibition. Other specimens were transmitted with Despatch 41 of 20 December 1866.
See M to H. Manners-Sutton, 15 December 1866 (in this edition as 66-12-15a) and M to H. Manners-Sutton, 23 December 1866.
A report from the Association of Paper Manufacturers of Great Britain and Ireland,
dated London 20 April 1867 and signed by John Evans FRS and Thomas Roytledge, stated
that there was a great difference in the strength and commercial value between the
samples. It was doubtful whether some of the vegetable products would be useful because
of lack of strength and length of fibre. Others, however were well adapted to paper
manufacture, namely Phormium tenax, Cyperus vaginatus, Dichelachne crinita, Stipa
semibarbata, Eucalyptus obliqua, and Xanthorrhoea minor. Phormium tenax was already
well known, and commanded a high price for ropemaking and spinning, which precluded
its use in papermaking 'at least in this country … when clean is worth about £25 per
ton' and made £35 when flax and Hemp prices were high; and for papermaking its value
in the raw state would not exceed £15 per ton. Few if any of the other plants were
superior to 'Esparto or Spanish Grass' and some inferior, either in strength or ease
of cleaning and bleaching. Esparto sold in British Ports for £4 to £5 (never more
than £6) per ton. Since all raw fibres bulk very large 'there appears no probability
that any of the materials prepared by Dr Mueller (with the exception of Phormium tenax)
could be imported into this country except at a loss, as the mere freight would probably
amount to more than the commercial value of the fibre. Whether the manufacture of
paper could be carried on in the Colony of Victoria depended on local conditions and
they could therefore offer no opinion on this. In conclusion they expressed 'high
approbation of the careful manner in which Dr Mueller has prepared his specimens and
the skill he has evinced in the selection of the materials for them' (National Archives,
London, CO 309/86, Victoria, original correspondence, Offices (part 2) and individuals,
vol. 4, 1867, Victoria 4238, f. 81).
A list of samples with comments on each was appended to the report. For example: '4.
Cyperus vaginatus: Apparently a useful material, with a fibre superior to that of
Spanish Esparto, but the pulp from which the sample was made seems to have been overboiled'
and '15. Lepidosperma gladiatium: a material well adapted for unbleached or whitey-brown
papers but it appears very doubtful if it would bleach'.
The report and a copy of the reply from the Committee of Privy Council for Trade was
included in Despatch 27 from the Colonial Ofice to Manners-Sutton on 6 May 1867.