Document information
Physical location:
66.06.01a
Plant names
-
Ceratonia siliqua
Search for
Ceratonia siliqua
in
Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to the Editor of the Herald, 1866-06-01 [66.06.01a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1866/66-06-01a-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026
1
Letter not found. The text given here is from 'The botanical gardens',
Herald
(Melbourne), 5 June 1866, p. 2.
2
Herald, 1 June 1866, p. 2, began
What definite purpose is a so-called Botanical Garden, intended or expected to subserve?
Is it that of a mere public recreation ground? If so, the cost to the public, in our
case at all events, is excessive. But even if the cost were not extravagant, a mere
pleasure garden is scarcely an institution worthy of the special care and expenditure
of the State.
The article argued that the Garden should be importing useful species, and gave as
examples the Carob and Cork oak. It asserted that
The Government Botanical Garden, in fine, does not seem to be used for its proper
and most important purpose — of facilitating the acclimatisation here of valuable
productions of the soil, to which the British colonist, from his northern education,
is necessarily a stranger, but for which the climate of Victoria is especially adapted.
3
Briefly mentioned in M to J. O'Shanassy, 15 April 1863 (B63.05.01).
4
B58.05.02, p. 101.
Ceratonia siliqua
Search for Ceratonia siliqua
in
5
Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company.
FRED.
MUELLER
6
Typsetter's error for
FERD?
Melbourne Botanical Gardens, 1st June
7
The editor added a parenthetical comment:
We are pleased to find that Dr. Mueller has given some attention to such plants as
the Carob tree and the Cork oak; but, nevertheless, the complaint generally made that
the Botanical Gardens do not fulfil any serviceable purpose, such as they might readily
do, in connection with acclimatisation, so as to justify their cost to the public,
remains unanswered. All that has been done of any value in this respect has been accomplished
by private enterprise. —Ed. Herald
M's letter elicited a response from A common gardener', who lamented the absence of
a 'decent bed of flowers' and concluded 'Verily, our Melbourne Botanical Gardens might
be appropriately defined as a plantation devoted to the absence of flowers' (Herald, 6 June 1866, p. 3).