Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70. un-numbered letter after f. 157. 64.12.25b

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1864-12-25 [64.12.25b]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1864/64-12-25b-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

Melbourne, Christmasday, 1864.
I have, dear Dr Hooker, just hurriedly glanced over your Handbook on New Zealand plants
1
J. Hooker (1864-7).
. is decidely only a variety of R. Haastii. The name R. hirtus B & S. is older than that of R. plebejus
2
R . plebeius in J. Hooker (1864-7).
If we adopt for the fruits of Compositae, which are truely connate with the calyx (of which the pappus is the limb) the expression achen[ium], we cannot possibly call the fruits of with the same name. To me the most correct name of them appears caryopsides.
is not confined to South Australia, a name meaning a certain colonial territory.
I still maintain that no specific differences exist between H. gramineum & H. Japonicum.
3
Hypericium.
Can really the two Hoherias be placed in different genera? To me they appear both e.
differs in no way from G. dissectum permanently.
occurs also on the Alps of Australia.
is also a Victorian plant. The species of are too numerous in your work.
occurs in the Tasmanian alps.
has no generic claims, the inflorescence of being as well paniculate as racemose. is the same as T. implexicoma.
occurs also in N. S. Wales & in South Australia.
we have from varied parts of extratropical Australia.
Panax cr[a]ssifolius
4
P. crassifolium in J. Hooker (1864-7).
is a true as Asa Gray has correctly pointed out, unless we abandon that genus. The species of I regard as to be largely re[duc]ted
The genus has certainly priority over Eurybia, but as the very few Olearias were already reduced to we receive now many additional synonyms. I am inclined to reduce the whole genus to Aster.
embraces only one species, the N.Z. one not differing from that of N. H. The plant occurs also in New Caledonia. It appears to me merely a subgenus of Aster.
is several years older than S. litoralis.
5
S. littoralis?
The are all forms of one species.
is = , a genus apparently different from Teucridium in a superior radicle and hence myoporineous & not verbenaceous.
6
J. Hooker (1864-7), p. 224 attributes to M, without a publication citation; it was M's herbarium name, see K881361. See also, under Spartothmanus junceus, B68.03.04, p. 153, and Bentham (1863-78), vol. 5, pp. 55-6; Hooker (1864-7), p. 739 in 'Additions, corrections, etc.' notes M's opinion of its systematic position.
7
P. Brunoniana in J. Hooker (1864-7).
is according to Seeman = P. inermis.
The number of Unciniae, of Carex, of Hymenophylla
8
Hymenophyllum?
& several other genera are certainly overrated.
occurs in the alps of Australia.
Regardfully
yrs
Ferd. Mueller.