The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: London ¶ (address Kew) Augt 7 1862 ¶ My dear Sir, ¶ ¶ The enclosed bill of lading ¶ was given to me just too late to send by last mail — and it was full of clerical blunders. The box was sent from K...

Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 62.08.07

Plant names

Bergia
Search for Bergia in
Calandrinia
Search for Calandrinia in
Claytonia Australasica
Search for Claytonia Australasica in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Elatine
Search for Elatine in
Elatineae
Search for Elatineae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Hypericum
Search for Hypericum in
Hypericum Japonicum
Search for Hypericum Japonicum in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Hypericum gramineum
Search for Hypericum gramineum in
Malvaceae
Search for Malvaceae in
Plagianthus Squamatus
Search for Plagianthus Squamatus in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Plagianthus glomeratus
Search for Plagianthus glomeratus in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Plagianthus microphyllus
Search for Plagianthus microphyllus in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Plagianthus spicatus
Search for Plagianthus spicatus in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Portulaceae
Search for Portulaceae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Sida
Search for Sida in
Talinium
Search for Talinium in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1862-08-07. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1862/62-08-07-final.odt>, accessed May 10, 2026

London

(address Kew) Augt 7 1862

My dear Sir,

The enclosed bill of lading

Document not found.

was given to me just too late to send by last mail — and it was full of clerical blunders. The box was sent from Kew Gardens in Dr Hooker's absence and the agent's clerk had misspelt your name and put live instead of dried plants — and I am not sure about the freight. I know Dr Hooker had said that it would be paid at Kew at least one way and I see it is charged to you — I will enquire about it before any more are returned to you. Although I date this as above from Kew that being my most permanent address I write this from town on my way to the country. Before I left Kew I had only time to finish , to do & and to commence . You will see by our Genera

Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1.

that we keep up Claytonia and and after carefully examining all the Australian I am still further confirmed in the expediency of doing so. All the Australian ones are s except which like the American ones has the stamens always isomerous with the petals and opposite them whilst in that is only very rarely the case and then only as it were accidentally and in a very few flowers — the habit also is generally different — , confined to a few species African & American is much more distinct in the strophiole of the seed and several accessory points.

We also keep up & as distinct — the obtuse thin sepals without prominent midrib with the consistence of the capsule are quite sufficient characters when accompanied by so decided a difference in habit.

As to the and Japonicum there are certainly two distinct forms which have different geographical ranges. Whether they are species or varieties is one of those moot points which it is difficult to make up one's mind about.

I have reexamined with care the genus Plagianthus and feel more confident in the limitation given to it in the Journ. Linn. Soc. than I did at the time of proposing it.

Bentham (1862a).

Artificial as must be the genera of , the more I examine them the more I feel persuaded that A. Gray's groups are the most natural that have been proposed and the styles, though not quite without exception, give some of the best characters and clearly separate Plagianthus from . I did not take dioecality into consideration because it has different degrees and different species of Plagianthus and exists probably more than is generally supposed in several s — but I believe it will turn out to be a very good secondary character in Plagianthus. I cannot quite agree with you in uniting P. glomeratus with P. spicatus. Drummond's specimens are very good and show no tendency to the spicate inflorescence — in many respects approaching luxuriant specimens of P. Squamatus although without the scurfy scales — I shall reconsider the matter when your specimens come — but we have a great many of P. spicatus from a great many stations. Are you sure that P. microphyllus is specifically distinct from P. squamatus of which we have from several Swan River collections, sometimes short tortuous and spirescent, sometimes elongated and luxuriant.

Yours very sincerely

George Bentham.

Dr Hooker has undertaken to forward to you the 1st part of our Genera

Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1, part 1, published 7 August 1862 (TL2).

now out.