Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol. LXXV, Australian and Pacific letters 1859-65, letter no. 123. 60.05.17

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to William Hooker, 1860-05-17. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1860-9/1860/60-05-17-final.odt>, accessed June 4, 2026

Melbourne bot & zool Gardens,
17. May 1860.
Dear Sir William,
Altho’ I have nothing of great interest to communicate, I will not deprive myself of the pleasure of adressing you as usual by the monthly mail & offer you this time the attempt of a systematic limitation of the extra-tropical Eucalypti.
1
B60.05.01, pp. 32-71.
I think that this together with my concisive essay on the tropical species
2
B58.11.01.
may serve as a foundation for a monographic labour, perhaps to be carried out by myself, if Dr Reisseck, Mr Kippist & Mr Heward are kindly lending their aid in furnishing the wanting material & dissipate the doubt yet overhanging many of the older species. When writing last mail to Dr Hooker
3
See M to J. Hooker, 20 April 1860 (in this edition as 60-04-20a).
on his beautiful Fl. Tasmaniae
4
J. Hooker (1860).
I believe I omitted mentioning, that the was found by Stuart on the "Nile River"
5
Northeast Tasmania, tributary of the South Esk River.
it accords exactly with the plant of St. Vincents Gulf. Stuart called it G. barbata. I believe I mentioned, that Dr Hooker forgot to insert from Mt Lapeyrouse
The Euc urnigera I regard closely allied to E corymbos[a], particularly as regards fruits. I have examined an original specimen of Siebers E acervula, which has anthers different to those of Euc Gunnii, of which I believe Dr Hookers E acervula is a synonym. If so I can congratulate Dr Hooker on having named one of the most magnific Eucalypti, for altho' small in alpine locality & low open plains, I have seen the tree 200' high in the deep forests.
I am delighted to hear of Dr Hookers & Mr Benthams united work on a revision of genera.
6
.Bentham & Hooker (1862-83).
Two men of such genius & of so almost unrivalled information will bring them to sound limits. — Perhaps Mr Bentham will also thereby allow me a little respit regarding the publication of Australian plants,
7
Bentham (1863-78).
as I can meanwhile bring many of my observations out. I am dissatisfied, that I cannot publish more & quicker, but the enormous amounts of work of this department precludes me almost from working except on Sundays.
I will send you by this or next mail seeds of the femal plant of , which produce, as you will probably be able to proof at Kew, plants alike to the parental plants, not hybrids, altho' the only bush we have in the garden is strictly feminine.
The published by Dr Hooker I find is identical with P. [adscendens].
8
M had named in B54.13.06, p. 40; Hooker's P. gunnii was published in 1856 (J. Hooker (1860), vol. 1, p. 99).
Wishing you, my dear Sir William, health & happiness, I subscribe myself as one of your devotest servants
Ferd Mueller