Document information
Physical location:
58.01.00Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to the Editor of the Argus, 1858-01. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id//letters/1850-9/1858/58-01-00-final.odt>, accessed June 13, 2026
1
Letter not found. The text given here is from 'Destruction of the tame animals in
the Botanical Gardens', Argus, 2 January 1858, p. 4 (B58.01.01).
Sir,—
Since the attempt of forming in the Botanical Gardens a collection of tame animals
met with such general and encouraging interest from our visitors, I hope you will
permit me to express through your columns my deep regret of the destruction of ten
of these poor creatures, which were killed by dogs during New Year’s Night.
Circumstances are connected with this unfortunate affair which leave no doubt that
the dogs did not spontaneously intrude into the gardens, and it is to be hoped that
the perpetrators of this crime will not escape the arm of justice.
Arrangements will be made for the full protection, during the night as well as the
day, of any animals which hereafter may be added by donation to the few remaining
ones; and I trust the banks of the lagoon will soon be enlivened again, and that malevolence
will not once more succeed in depriving the gardens of the additional attraction which
the little menagerie lately exercised.
Most obediently,
FERD. MUELLER.
2
On the same page as this letter, the following report was made: ‘Dr. Mueller, the
Government Botanist, and Director of the Botanic Gardens, has communicated to the
Detective Police particulars of some apparently malicious injuries to the public property
which have been committed within the last two days. On the afternoon of Wednesday,
the 30th ult., the grass inside the reserve attached to the gardens was set on fire,
it is supposed by some boys residing near the locality; and on the night of the 31st
two of the tame animals kept in the wire inclosure were destroyed by dogs. Dr. Mueller
is under the impression that this last injury was not caused by dogs accidentally
getting at the animals, but that it was wilfully perpetrated, and he offers a reward
for the conviction of the perpetrators. Should any of the acts above mentioned be
brought home to any persons, they, perhaps, are not aware that the punishment would
be very severe; and it is to be hoped they will not long elude the vigilance of the
police.’