Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol. LXXIV, Australia letters 1851-8, letter no. 149*. 55.04.05

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to William Hooker, 1855-04-05. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/55-04-05>, accessed May 18, 2024

1
Part of this letter is misfiled immediately after the last page of letter no. 146, M to W. Hooker, 19 November 1854. The matching of the sheets is confirmed from the sequence of the excerpts of the letter published as B55.08.01 and B55 12.03. The changes in the printed version noted here are those that alter sense, or the spelling of plant and place names. Editorial additions follow the printed version.
bot. gardens Melbourne
5. April 1855.
Sir William
Three letters
2
Letters not found.
of yours, which were received with much delight lay at present unanswered before me. The first of them came about a month ago into my hands, but I hesitated to forward the already written answer, as I weekly expected to learn, wheather I had to remain in this colony or not. This is at last decided and I can joyfully say, to my favor.
3
satisfaction for favor in the printed version .
—
By the papers you will have observed, that the once so florishing financial state of this colony which gave birth to so many useful institutions and [necssary] — now with difficulty to be followed up or carried out, — has for a time at least entirely changed, and the abolishment of the scientific institutions (excluding however the university) was decided upon, great retrenchments were made in every direction and were necessary, and amongst others my department was surely [none] of pressing necessity. The leg. council however took a different view and a petition was moved for by Dr. Greeves to be presented to his Excellency for putting an adequate sum on the estimates for this year, to enable me and several others to continue in office.
4
At the Legislative Council session no. 73, 9 March 1855, 'Mr. Greeves moved, pursuant to amended notice, That this House resolve itself into a Committee of the whole for the purpose of considering the propriety of presenting an Address to His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor, praying that His Excellency will be pleased to place on the Estimates for the year 1855 the following sums, viz:— £1000 for the salary and expenses of the Government Botanist ... ' [sums for other scientific institutions follow]. See Victoria, Legislative Council (1855) Votes and proceedings, vol. 1, p. 291.
As I trust to be able to say for my own honour, that no fault can be found with what I have done since being in the service, I can not doubt that the measure of the Leg. Council will receive his Excellency's sanction; — and I have to thank you now so much [more] for having evinced so much kind interest in my labours, as to adress Sir Charl Hotham in my behalf.
5
W. Hooker recommended M to Governor Hotham, before the latter left England to take up his appointment, and Hotham replied that he considered 'it a public duty to contribute my official help to those who may stand in need of it' (C. Hotham to W. Hooker, 14 March 18[54], RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol. LXXIV, Australia letters 1851-8, letter no. 78).
Hooker also wrote to Hotham on 2 November 1854: 'Dr Mueller, respecting whom I took the liberty of writing to you, is, I am happy to say in frequent communication with me, & not by letter only but he sends numerous specimens of plants, many quite new ones, & of the whole he has drawn up, in Latin, most excellent & scientific characters & descriptions; & this extensive mst. may be considered the foundation of a complete "Flora of Victoria." So sensible are the Botanists here & myself of the value of these researches, that I have taken the great liberty of addressing to the Colonial Secretary at Melbourne a demi-official letter on this subject, hoping he may think it right to lay it before the Governor & Council. It is true we do not expect your Excellency & the Members of the Council should be Botanists: but we hope we may be allowed to consider you patrons of Botany, especially when you have so very able a person as Dr Mueller who holds the appointment of Botanist to the Colony, & whose services must be in a measure lost, unless he his assisted in the publishing of the result of his researches. I have just sent out to Dr Mueller a considerable present of Botanical Books. But he writes to me to order a further supply from a Bookseller. I do not think any Bookseller would send out books to a stranger to be paid for on their arrival there: — & indeed I am not without hope that the Colony will provide Books at the Botanic Garden, I presume, for the use of the Botanical & Horticultural staff.' (No. 118, unit 1, VPRS 4021, Public Record Office, Victoria). See also W. Hooker to J. Foster, 2 November 1854 (in this edition as M54-11-02).The Assistant Colonial Secretary, J. Moore, replied to Hooker on behalf of Hotham, 24 January 1855: 'at the present moment it is impossible to accede to your suggestion — but should the next financial year find the Colony in a better state, His Exy will be happy to entertain your desire' (No. 167, unit 2, pp. 33-4, VPRS 2814, Public Record Office, Victoria).
Before entering upon the details of your letter to which I will refer point by point I beg to acknowledge most thankfully the transmission of the books and seeds which you, Sir William, had the favour of sending by Mr Burton.
6
There are two letters from H. Burton to W. Hooker, 17 August 1854, announcing that he was returning to Melbourne near the end of August, and that he would 'be pleased to deliver anything to anyone' (RBG Kew, Directors' letters, vol. LXXIV, Australia letters 1851-8, letters 33 & 34). F. Adamson to Hooker, 10 April 1855, reports that Adamson had informed M where Burton could be contacted in order to obtain Hooker's parcel (RBG Kew, Directors letters, vol. LXXIV, Australia letters 1851-8, letter no. 4). Burton has not been further identified.
The latter, a valuable acquisition are already in the ground, and the former, for which I will remit by Mr Archer,
7
William Archer.
have proved already useful to me in many ways. The Musci exotici
8
W. Hooker (1818-20)
contains charming drawings, which must render muscology, to any botanist attractive. Your journal is always a pleasing recreation, and Dr. J. Hooker's Flora of New Zealand,
9
J. Hooker (1853-5).
will, to judge from the introductory number, be a guide to direct roads and correct directions through the labyrinth of systematic. It will open many of our best botanists, and directly to the continental ones, th[eir]
10
editorial addition — obscured by binding.
eyes to see what are the real limits of species. This highly important work will be most instructive to me; I have already seen, that probably my first as
Anemone

Search for Anemone in

mentioned plants (but I think I called it Caltha in my last letter) will be identical with C. N. Zealand[iae]
11
editorial addition — obscured by binding.
certainly it approaches closely to
Caltha sagittata

Search for Caltha sagittata in

. But thereon hereafter.
I have farther to express my thanks for the pain you have already taken in regard to a flora of this Colony, and for writing purposely to our Governor and Colonial Secretary. The exertions also of our noble old Governor will ever leave a deep impression on my mind and I will write to him
12
Letter not found.
either by this vessel or by Mr Archer, the V. D. L.
13
Van Diemen's Land.
Botanist, who goes for some years to England, bringing all his plants to you. He leaves in a few weeks, and I shall feel great pleasure in forwarding a set of alpine plants with him. I would have send already with this vessel, but they will only arrive from Gipps land at the very time when the "Lightning" leaves.
Dr Greeves, member of the Leg. Council, and an ardent promoter of science in this colony, will upon my recommendation transmit to you a large quantity of
Atherosperma

Search for Atherosperma in

bark. He praises it highly as a remedy in Bronchitis and I had myself an opportunity of becoming acquainted with its tonic properties. I have no doubt it contains an alkaloid of its own. Not only to see it subjected to a good quantitative chemical analysis but also to be examined by medical gentlemen attached to hospitals, we are very desirous, as it would perhaps form a precious article of export for at least four colonies.
14
Dr Greeves ... for at least four colonies. — is a marginal note in the MS. Its position here follows the printed version. See also M to J. von Liebig, 17 June 1859.
From Dr Harvey I have heard a few days ago,
15
Letter not found. Harvey returned from Tasmania to Melbourne on 20 April 1855, and remained for about one month before arriving in Sydney on 25 May. See Ducker (1988), pp. 220-1.
he is soon returning to this colony, so that I can enjoy again his instructions and company. He discovered on these shores no less than 4 new gen. of algae.
16
Presumably Bellotia (B. eriophorum), Curdiea (C. laciniata), Gulsonia (G. annulata) and Apjohnia (A. laetevirens). See Harvey (1855).
Is that not glorious? — This weeks Stuart, the V.D L collector, goes upon my expense to N. Zeel. I directed him to the Middle island, and it will give me much satisfaction to be able to increase thus your own stock of N. Z. plants. A few days ago I received also Dr Meissners remarks
17
Meisner (1853a), Meisner (1853b) and Meisner (1853), respectively.
on my collections of
Proteaceae

Search for Proteaceae in

,
Thymeleae

Search for Thymeleae in

18
printed version has Thymelaeae.
&
Polygoneae

Search for Polygoneae in

(going as far as 1852) I must candidly confess my regret, that this active and acute botanist not takes a more ample view of the precincts of special [diverty].
19
M's apparent spelling: printed version has and acute botanist not takes a more enlarged view of the variations of species.
Our science becomes more and more encumbered with synonymy and in instances as in Grev. Austral.
20
Grevillea australis.
& G. tenuifolia, Dr Hookers opinions, based upon so much more ample material, ought not to have been disregarded.
21
Meisner (1853).
It is a sad feeling to me also, to see against all my remonstrations,
22
printed version omits against all my remonstrations.
nearly all of my old appellations now in print: most of these names have been years ago replaced by more correct ones; they were originated mostly when I was very inexperienced here and much more in want of books than now and should only serve instead of numbers which by a slight inaccuracy lead at once into mistakes. I write by this mail also to Dr Sonder, to endeavour, that several errors of Meisner may not pass into DC pr.
23
printed version substitutes to make some observations that may be in time for De Candolle's Prodromus for to endeavour, that several errors of Meisner may not pass into DC pr.
and to give him also more information on the extent of the species over the country. I may be permitted in this letter to make a few passing remarks on these points. What Prof Meisner mentions as G. triternata is my (not his) G. nutans. I really believe the sp. is good and I think the name might be altered now in
24
printed version substitutes to for in.
thyrsantha. Grevill. pubescens (non Hook) is G. Latrobii var. pubescens. I doubt also the distinction of G. rosmarinifolia and G. Latrobii. G. Stuartii I think is a var of G. Australis. G. micrantha = G. parviflora first rep. p. 17
25
B53.10.01.
and I think also of R Br
Hakea stricta

Search for Hakea stricta in

= H. leucoptera sec. gen. rep
26
B54.10.01.
and R.Br? — Muehlenbeckia
27
printed version has Mühlenbeckia.
parvifolia = M. axillaris
Banksia prionophylla

Search for Banksia prionophylla in

= B. Cunninghami?
Pimelea dichotoma

Search for Pimelea dichotoma in

I received from Dr. Behr its discoverer; the flowers of it are, as you will observe in the specimens fowarded last year, white , and in 5 years observation of this plant I never saw them yellow, nor the bracts tinged yellow in the manner as those of
Euphorbia

Search for Euphorbia in

s. Moreover P. dichotoma is a real scrub- and desert-plant, whilst P. flava is entirely absent from South Australia and makes only its appearance in the more southern latitudes of this colony where Tasmanian plants predominate.
28
Vol VII. 241 MS interline in an unknown hand. The reference is to the page of B55.08.01 where the printed extract of this letter appears.
Pimel. nutans & P. cernua are varieties of P. linifolia.
Grevillea Dallachiana

Search for Grevillea Dallachiana in

will I trust retain its name, for neither the appellation alpina of Ldl.
29
John Lindley.
nor alpestris of Meisner can be admitted, as the beautiful shrub grows in the warmest parts of the ranges and even frequently in the scrub of hot plains . If ever ascending to subalpine altitudes (and I am not aware of it) it will be like hundreds of other plants in a crippled state.
The Microtis so common through South Austr, Victoria, and V. D. L. is over and over examined by myself in a living state; it is unquestionably M. media R. Br! Not much do M. rara and M. parviflora differ from it. But I cannot adopt Prof. Lindleys opinion, it should be M. pulchella.
30
Lindley (1853).
I examined
Microtis minutiflora

Search for Microtis minutiflora in

in a living state and after having seen this plant now range as far as Gipps land I am inclined to take this for pulchella, notwithstanding it does not entirely concurr with R. Br diagnosis.
31
The Microtis so common ... with R. Br diagnosis. is a marginal note on the second sheet of MS. Its position here follows the printed version.
In Prof Lindley's remarks on my
Orchideae

Search for Orchideae in

much remains to me doubtful.
32
Lindley (1853).
I am very anxious to learn, whether he had for his gen. & sp. orch.
33
Lindley (1830-40).
R. Br's original specimens in hand. It is my intention to describe accurately all the species so as the [spring] will offer them, in the manner of
Diuris elongata

Search for Diuris elongata in

&c It appears to me so unprobable, that plants like his
Caladenia mollis

Search for Caladenia mollis in

, which have such extensive range over the country should have exscaped R. Br.
With regard to my intended Flora of Victoria I think it best, that I should publish it here myself, I dare say in the Gov. printing office; i.e. in English. Before however I can make the beginning to this work several districts have yet to be visited, one of which will probably produce many Tasmanian forms. Others have yet to be examined in a different season. My desire was, under the difficulty of publishing all the manuscript, which I have send, to be favoured with a little space now and then for the new species, of which a stereotyp Latin diagnosis ought to be published after all. I should be so proud, if you would select what you, Sir William, thought correctly described of new plants for insertion into your journal. Mr. Kippist said once, that the Linnean society would give publicity to new plants if specimens were along with them. Perhaps he would accept a few natural orders thus, altho' a ful series of the corresponding specimens may be wanting, for I shall be happy to lay always some collection for the L. S. aside, and partly the L. S. must be already in possesion of them. My friend Prof. Fürnrohr would also be glad, I think, to receive through Dr. Sonder a small set of the manuscript now with you. The objects of such dispersion of the material in the present state would be, to acquaint the botanists with the new plants of this colony. By my next journey I think to complete the bot. survey of this colony and by the commencement of next year I hope to have to my delight and my instruction Dr. J. Hookers Tasmanian Flora in the first fascicle before me.
34
J. Hooker (1860), the first fascicle of whch was issued in October 1855.
I would venture then to follow with my own work, and I do not see material difficulty in bringing it out here, could I by that time become acqainted with the errors of the respective part to begin with, I mean
Thalamiflorae

Search for Thalamiflorae in

. Highly I appreciate your kindful information this time
Hydycarya

Search for Hydycarya in

35
Hedycarya?
has yellow [acini], rather fleshy;
Heuzenroedera

Search for Heuzenroedera in

36
Heuzenroedera

Search for Heuzenroedera in

was listed without description in B54.10.01, p. 14, but never formally described by M, although specimens collected along the Murray River (Vic) were distributed as H. dysphanoides. See M's labels on K898505, undated, and K898506, dated 'Dec 53'; Bentham (1863-78), vol. 5, p. 165 used the latter specimen in describing
Dysphania

Search for Dysphania in

myriocephala.
Heuzenroedera

Search for Heuzenroedera in

was presumably intended to honour Moritz and/or Heinrich Heuzenroeder, pharmacists whose dispensary in Adelaide, SA, had served as M's base during his time in that colony.
appeared to me, when I analysed it some years back, rather nearer allied to
Monolepis

Search for Monolepis in

than to
Dysphania

Search for Dysphania in

; but I may be much in error, the flowering parts are very small and appear according to Moquin not correctly described by R Br., besides that I was at that time not in possession of such superior specimens of this plant, as I have since gathered.
You justly complain, Sir William, about the very indifferent state of many of my specimens and still I have always selected the best for you. I am under the great disadvantage here, that I have to collect the various species [most] from so remote localities. Compared with V. D L. there is here hardly anything to be found in the environs of the city; days journeys I have to go before I reach a interesting spot, whilst the botanists of V. D L. collect most of their plants commodiously near their dwellings. — Particularly unfavourable was the season last year for scrub-plants, but I believed, I mentioned at that time,
37
M to W. Hooker, 28 April 1854.
that I had at least been able to gather seeds of them, and so I see now many picked up in a miserable state as specimens grow in our garden; for instance the charming
Aceratia connata

Search for Aceratia connata in

,
38
Aceratia connata

Search for Aceratia connata in

not found (APNI, accessed 29 August 2019).
Cucurbita micrantha

Search for Cucurbita micrantha in

etc. I hope Kew garden will be equally fortunate in the growth of the seeds collected here.
I am exceedingly annoyed that on my manuscripts a second postcharge has been made, as I paid for them to the postmaster-General here myself. By Mr Archer I will remit a sum for books and for a few dozend copies of such fascicles of your or other Journals as may contain descriptions of plants of mine. Your journal I shall be most happy to receive regularly; it is such a delightful and instructive recreation to read it. Much pleased I was yesterday to observe that Prof. de Vriese (according to your enumeration) has adopted the beautiful genus
Picrophyta

Search for Picrophyta in

.
39
M's genus (see B53.04.01, p. 421) is listed in an unsigned notice of de Vriese (1854), in Hooker's journal of botany and Kew Garden Miscellany, vol. 6, pp. 223-4.
It was also pleasant to see that my observations on the Australian flora have been useful for Prof Balfours outlines.
40
J. Balfour (1854). On p. 138 (citing 'Müller') Balfour paraphrased M's statement in B53.03.01, p. 72 'that the cultivation of grain, which has so completely transformed one part of the wilderness of Australia, has already exercised so beneficial an influence on the increase of the rain'.
Drapetes Tasmanica

Search for Drapetes Tasmanica in

is an inhabitant of the Australian alps. I observe, that the character of
Thymelea

Search for Thymelea in

as given by R Br. with regard to the insertion of the stamens must be altered according to this genus, what is neither done in Lin. Veg. Kingd. nor in Willkomms new work.
41
Lindley (1847).
Thymelea

Search for Thymelea in

is treated on pp. 530-1 in all editions. Willkomm (1854), vol. 2, pp. 235ff. treats the ‘order’
Thymeleae

Search for Thymeleae in

.
— Of
Polygonum lapathifolium

Search for Polygonum lapathifolium in

I found here also the wooly form. It is R. Br's P. lanigerum[,]
42
editorial addition — obscured by binding. All square brackets in the following have this meaning.
nor do P. glandulosum & P. elatius essentially differ from it. —
Würthia

Search for Würthia in

Regel described in Prof. Fürnrohrs flora
43
Regel (1851). M was in error in referring to Flora.
= is identical with Orthrosanthus Sweet, nor appears the species to differ from O. multiflorus. Have you seen Schuchhardts Tremandreae.
44
Schuchardt (1853).
It is a nice little pamphlet with a good deal [of] additional information, altho' much [of] uncertain characters has been mixed into the diagnosis[;] some of the general remarks require also a little alteration. A good chara[cter] for distinguishing Tetrathecae is offered also by the direction of the sepals in a fresh state; I adopted it in my own transmitted diagnosis of Tetrath. baueraefolia, but niether Steetz
45
Steetz (1853).
nor Shuchhardt
46
Schuchardt (1853).
could make use of it as they saw only dried specimens.
With much pleasure I perused the article of Mr Drummonds exploration [of] the northern district of Western Australia.
47
Drummond (1853).
Several plants from Lake Torrens I think I can identify from his notes.
I hope to be pardoned, Sir William, for my hasty writing this time. Let me conclude with my best wishes for your welfare.
Yours obediently
Ferd. Mueller.
Most of the "pl. Muell" hitherto enumerated,
48
Sonder (1852) and subsequent parts in Linnaea, vols 26, 28, 29.
chiefly the rare new ones were obtained in South Australia and all the specimens for the purpose of saving room (of which everyone is wanting here) were with exception of one, transmitted to Sonder.
I will however during this winter transmit fragments of as many as I possibly can, but I repeat with pleasure, that Dr. Hooker is quite wellkom indeed to select from my plants remaining [in] Sonders hand what he may require.