Search

Text

Title

Manuscript

Location

Document ID

Taxon name

Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1863-12-12.
Melbourne bot Garden ¶ 12/12/63 ¶ Dear Mr Bentham. ¶ ¶ By the Sussex I have forwarded to you 2 Cases, containing 52 fascicles of Eucalypti; the whole of my collection of that genus. I have inserted a...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1865-12-25.
25/12/65 ¶ ¶ Only the helichrysoid Compositae, dear Mr Bentham, are remaining to be sent to you; these will soon follow the two other boxes Compositae despatched in Sept by the Kent & in Nov by the Y...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1869-03-28.
28/3/69 ¶ ¶ By the Anglesey in a few days, dear Dr Hooker, I shall send off the ¶ rest ¶ of the Dicotyledoneae, in two large Boxes. I am very glad that I managed to put these plants all into perfec...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1869-03-28.
28/3/69 ¶ ¶ I am glad, dear Mr Bentham, to receive already the 30 copies of vol IV, which have been distributed by the Government to public institutions, ministers of the Crown and the few principle ...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1869-04-12.
Melbourne bot. Garden, ¶ 12/4/69 ¶ ¶ As indicated by last overland mail, dear Dr Hooker, you will now receive by the Anglesey the rest of the Dicotyledoneae for Mr Bentham's use. ¶ ¶ They are in two...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1869-04-17.
17/4/69 ¶ ¶ I have not very much to report, dear Mr Bentham, beyond the despatch of the last Dicotyledoneae in two large cases by the Anglesey. You need not be alarmed by the quantity of the material...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1870-09-06.
6/9/70 ¶ ¶ By last mail, dear Mr Bentham, and by this, I sent you the continuation of the brief emendatory remarks on the pages of the 5th volume, which you kindly forwarded to me. ¶ This new volume...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1872-03-18.
Melbourne ¶ bot Garden ¶ 18/3/72 ¶ ¶ By the steamship "Northumberland," ¶ dear Mr Bentham, I have at last sent a case with more plants for your use. This is the first sending after nearly ¶ three ¶...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1875-02-23.
Melbourne ¶ 23/2/75. ¶ ¶ I am glad to learn from you by last mail, dear Mr Bentham, that the case with Junceae, Restiaceae &c safely arrived. ¶ There is of course always great risk in trusting such ...
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1879-10-08.
8/10/79. ¶ ¶ It is with delight, dear Mr Bentham, that I learn of the completion of the genera to the end of Dicotyledoneae! ¶ What a grand work! Had you & Sir Joseph never done any thing else, it w...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1880-04-14.
14/4/80 ¶ ¶ Herewith, Sir Joseph, some seeds from Mr Alex Forrests Expedition in N.W. Australia, ¶ received only ¶ this ¶ day from Mr Carey. ¶ I also forward fresh tubers of Dipodium. Perhaps you...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Alphonse de Candolle, 1880-08-04.
4.8.1880 ¶ Dear Mr De Candolle. ¶ ¶ I must express my thanks for your attention in sending me your "Phytography"; ¶ another volume you have added to the important publications that have made your na...
Ferdinand von Mueller to B. Daydon Jackson, 1881-12-25.
Christmas/1881/ ¶ I am somewhat surprised, dear Mr Jackson, that Mr Forrest ¶ has not at once paid his dues; – but he is a high-minded and wealthy man; hence he is sure to send his remittance at once...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1882-06-29.
29/6/82 ¶ ¶ The Census, ¶ of which I send a secont ¶ proof sheet, dear Sir Joseph, explains itself. As a Commentary to Bentham's fl. Austral. ¶ and to the fragmenta also it will facilitate the use...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Paolo Dattari, 1886-04-14.
14/4/86. ¶ ¶ In reply to your note, ¶ dear Mr Dattari, let me say, that when botanic works are written, we must draw the distinction between popular and strictly professional ones, and must adopt fo...
Ferdinand von Mueller to Jean Müller, 1893-04-18.
18/4/93. ¶ ¶ I think I have not yet consulted you, highly esteemed friend, as I long ago wished in reference to your views on the inclusion of the Monochlamydeae. Because the ¶ 3rd Census ¶ must so...