Document information
Physical location:
No. 548, folder 28, series 4, MS 610 Deane family papers, National Library of Australia, Canberra. 93.10.15Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Henry Deane, 1893-10-15. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/93-10-15>, accessed September 11, 2025
15/10/93.
In setting to work, dear Mr Deane, for adding notes to yours for the new part of Fitzgerald's
Orchids
I find, that you likely not have my "Census of Australian plants" I will send you
the second edition,
because it will refer you to notes in the "fragm. phytogr. Austral", a copy of which
is likely accessible to you. A second point for consideration is presenting itself,
if you quote
verbatim
from Bailey's synopsis, which Mr Fitzgerald never has done, in such cases, where a
description was given in the Flora or in the fragmenta, then these two works would
become
superseded
, which would not be just to Bentham nor to myself.
You have such excellent knowledge of the science of plants, that you could easily
give a
description of your own
At all events the Flora and the Fragmenta ought to be quoted and
not solely
the synopsis, unless the species were first described in the synopsis. As this is
the commencement of your Editor ship which — I trust — will continue through many
years, I take the liberty of pointing out to you my views on this subject, and I have
a sort of moral obligation also for watching Bentham's interest. It would undoubtedly
be well, even if some slight delay occurred to do justice to Bentham. Of course, it
would be necessary to adduce
discarded synonyms
in your work. Of Adelopetalum bracteatum I have never seen a specimen. Indeed our
departed friend never communicated to me any dried Orchids of any kind
1
Following Fitzgerald's death in August 1892, Deane was commissioned to complete Part
5 of vol. 2 of his
Australian orchids, 'using such notes as had been left by Mr Fitzgerald, and supplementing these from
his own valuable experience and observations'. Deane evidently sought M's advice on
what he had done, and his comments are reflected in some of the published notes. The
new material was published in 1894.
2
B89.12.03.
3
Bailey (1890); Bentham (1863-78), vol. 6, pp. 267-396. Although Bailey is mentioned
in Deane's text, Bailey (1890) is not cited.
Will you kindly try to see, when on the Tweed,
or ask your officers to do so, whether only Nymphaea gigantea (with serrated leaves)
occurs there; or whether N. coerulea (N. stellata) can also be found (with entire
leaves). Some other characteristics distinguish these two, which often grow intermixed,
though Bentham saw not the distinctions notwithstanding my previous identification
of the two.
I believe N. coerulea could be shown also to occur in NSW and so in lagoons Aldrovanda vesiculosa, of which I gave a figure in the transact LS. of N.SW.
4
i.e. Tweed River, NSW.
5
Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1,
p. 61.
6
Transactions of the Linnean Society of New South Wales,
new series, vol. 2, 1887, p. 621, records a drawing of
Aldrovanda vesiculosa
being exhibited on M's behalf at a meeting of the Society on 28 September 1887. However,
the drawing does not seem to have been published.
With regardful remembrance your
Ferd von Mueller
Adelopetalum bracteatum
Aldrovanda vesiculosa
Nymphaea coerulea
Nymphaea gigantea
Nymphaea stellata