Document information

Physical location:

No. 548, folder 28, series 4, MS 610 Deane family papers, National Library of Australia, Canberra. 93.10.15

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Henry Deane, 1893-10-15. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/93-10-15>, accessed September 11, 2025

15/10/93.
In setting to work, dear Mr Deane, for adding notes to yours for the new part of Fitzgerald's Orchids
1
Following Fitzgerald's death in August 1892, Deane was commissioned to complete Part 5 of vol. 2 of his Australian orchids, 'using such notes as had been left by Mr Fitzgerald, and supplementing these from his own valuable experience and observations'. Deane evidently sought M's advice on what he had done, and his comments are reflected in some of the published notes. The new material was published in 1894.
I find, that you likely not have my "Census of Australian plants" I will send you the second edition,
2
B89.12.03.
because it will refer you to notes in the "fragm. phytogr. Austral", a copy of which is likely accessible to you. A second point for consideration is presenting itself, if you quote verbatim from Bailey's synopsis, which Mr Fitzgerald never has done, in such cases, where a description was given in the Flora or in the fragmenta, then these two works would become superseded , which would not be just to Bentham nor to myself.
3
Bailey (1890); Bentham (1863-78), vol. 6, pp. 267-396. Although Bailey is mentioned in Deane's text, Bailey (1890) is not cited.
You have such excellent knowledge of the science of plants, that you could easily give a description of your own At all events the Flora and the Fragmenta ought to be quoted and not solely the synopsis, unless the species were first described in the synopsis. As this is the commencement of your Editor ship which — I trust — will continue through many years, I take the liberty of pointing out to you my views on this subject, and I have a sort of moral obligation also for watching Bentham's interest. It would undoubtedly be well, even if some slight delay occurred to do justice to Bentham. Of course, it would be necessary to adduce discarded synonyms in your work. Of Adelopetalum bracteatum I have never seen a specimen. Indeed our departed friend never communicated to me any dried Orchids of any kind
Will you kindly try to see, when on the Tweed,
4
i.e. Tweed River, NSW.
or ask your officers to do so, whether only Nymphaea gigantea (with serrated leaves) occurs there; or whether N. coerulea (N. stellata) can also be found (with entire leaves). Some other characteristics distinguish these two, which often grow intermixed, though Bentham saw not the distinctions notwithstanding my previous identification of the two.
5
Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, p. 61.
I believe N. coerulea could be shown also to occur in NSW and so in lagoons Aldrovanda vesiculosa, of which I gave a figure in the transact LS. of N.SW.
6
Transactions of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, new series, vol. 2, 1887, p. 621, records a drawing of Aldrovanda vesiculosa being exhibited on M's behalf at a meeting of the Society on 28 September 1887. However, the drawing does not seem to have been published.
With regardful remembrance your
Ferd von Mueller
Adelopetalum bracteatum
Aldrovanda vesiculosa
Nymphaea coerulea
Nymphaea gigantea
Nymphaea stellata