Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1882-90, ff. 252-3. 88.05.23

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to William Thiselton-Dyer, 1888-05-23. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/88-05-23>, accessed October 18, 2024

1
Date stamped: Royal Gardens Kew 27. Jun. 88. Annotated in ink at top left of page 371-1888, and (by Thiselton-Dyer?): Thanked 10.7.88. (l etter not found).
23/5/88.
My principal reason for writing this time, dear Prof Dyer, is to say, that Mr Frogatt,
2
i.e. Walter Froggatt .
who was Entomologist to Capt Everill's New Guinea Expedition, and who has since been engaged by the Hon. Will Macleay for collecting Insects in NW. Australia, brings you — while on a first Visit to Europe — an only plant
3
plant underlined in red pencil. The specimen was noted as having been brought by Walter Froggatt (Kew Inwards Book, 1888-1892, July 2, p. 65, entry number 371), with an added note in red ink ‘Dead Aug. 88’.
in my possession (indeed any where existing in cuture here) of Telopea oreades.
4
Telopea oreades underlined in red pencil. Annotations in ink : Recd. 2.viii. 88 in left margin, and Seeds also were recd. June 30-88 from Mr Maiden Techn. Mus. Sydney at foot of f. 252, front .
I am not certain, whether you have T. truncata,
5
Annotation in red pencil interlined below Truncata: Yes.
but anyhow that plant is quite distinct from T. oreades, I have studied both in their native haunts
6
I have … haunts is a marginal note with intended position indicated by an asterisk .
though both are more closely cognate than to T. speciosissima. Both would delight in mild frosts , so that with shelter from wind and some slight cover they could be kept likely in the open air of the Channel-Islands and even perhaps at Kew As this unique specimen was however carried 200 miles from the Highlands of East Gippsland (packed in Moss) by hand , and as I established it in its pot for more than 6 months, it is too valuable to be trusted out at Kew. What a glorious sight it will be one day there, to have both these hardy Telopeas along with Dracophyllum Milligani
7
Dracophyllum Milligani underlined in red pencil and annotation in red pencil interlined below Milligani : what is this?
and Richea pandanifolia in the open garden! Mr Frogatt will bestow every care on the plant; but still it will have to pass the ordeal of the Red Sea. I have planted out here a shrub of red flowered Correa Lawrenciana; perhaps it will be of avail to put a cutting into the Telopea pot.
8
Annotation in red pencil after pot : not found.
Regardfully your
Ferd von Mueller.
I wrote lately again to Sir Joseph about the likelihood of Chenolea hirsuta existing on the British coast.
9
See M to J. Hooker, 25 April 1888.
It is easily missed, as from its specific name you would look for a plant with some vestiture, whereas frequently it is almost as glabrous as Suaeda maritima. I think Scirpus radicans (not always true to the character of its specific name) & Juncus Tenagiea ought also to turn up in Britain.
10
Postscript continues into left margin, f. 253, back.
Your important "Bulletins" will be duely noted in the new Edition of the "Select plants".
11
Paragraph in left margin, f. 253, front. Thiselton-Dyer began the Bulletin of miscellaneous infor m ation in January 1887; the Bulletin was among the sources listed in B88.12.01, p. v.
Chenolea hirsuta
Correa Lawrenciana
Dracophyllum Milligani
Juncus tenagiea
Richea pandanifolia
Scirpus radicans
Suaeda maritima
Telopea oreades
Telopea speciosissima
Telopea truncata