Document information
Physical location:
RB MSS M136, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 84.07.28b
Plant names
-
Phaius Grandifolius
Search for
Phaius Grandifolius
in
Preferred Citation:
James Roberts to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1884-07-28 [84.07.28b]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/84-07-28b>, accessed September 11, 2025
1
MS annotation by M: 'Answ 30/7/84. Fv.M'. Letter not found.
2
Melbourne.
July 28th /84
Dear Baron
Your note to hand
and I regret much I have not another flower left a forthnight ago when I called at
your residence, and you not at home
I had a splendid flower with me, as large again as the one I now sent you of No 2
which you think a Phaius the flowers do not last long the sepals & petals drop off
in a few days after opening, but that might be on a/c of being in my warm house and
at the time of blooming I had no other place as I was altering my other house — I
have sent you the flower stem with fruit which it seem freely to produce Each flower
having had a seed pod but which I had taken off the spike produced 6 flowers, but
strange Enough Each flower was turned upside down when opened the petals are about
½ in long Brownish yellow and 3 or more lines of sort of brown paralel from point of petal to base or Labellum sepals also the lip is fringed & rather pretty
when first open whitish with pink about the fringe it appears peculiar for a Phaius
blooming as it does from a pointed stalk about 3 Joints up from an abnormal leaf or
Enlarged bract the next being a fairly shaped leaf. All Phaius I know the fl
stalk springs from the bottom of the stock root between the outside leaves, when
Mr Layard picked it up he marked it as being new to him not having seen it before
nor was there any more where he got it — I have another plant and I see some appearance
of a spike in the Axil of the big bract clasping round the Stem I hope it will bloom
and I will forward you the flowers — I enclose also a Bloom of P. Grandifolius to
compare with the other which is quiet distinct as to Color in flower and very much
so in foliage in fact it is a more Elegant plant on a/c of the longer & narrower leaves
and light green transparency the flower I sent you was I think too old to judge by
as far as Color was concerned the labellum of No 1
when opened fresh is from the base 3 parts up a beautiful creamy white & round about
the mouth where it is fringed is a delicate rosy pink in Grandifolius the labellum
is a dirty Color from base to the 3rd way up and the lip is a dark purplish red than
mine this is no doubt a true Phaius — but I some how doubt the other — should it be
so, amongst the many I Know and Seen I never saw a Phaius with a fruited stem and
above all to flower as it were a branch from the knotted Joint I am sorry that I did
not send you it before — I am under the impression when I go down there I shall get
a lot of things not described yet if I can get my Outdoor work done by latter End
of sept I shall make a start, but if an opportunity offers for N Guinea I shall take
that first the Gentleman who brought me the few Orchids that you Kindly recommended
to me tells me there are beautiful things there I intend to se
Mr Symes very shortly to see what they are going to do again
— Mr Stewart said he was Going a trip on a missionary Ship instead of Syme's Expedition
to many of the Islands round about in Torres Straits & Elsewhere I am to see him again
before he goes — hoping you are improving in health
3
Letter not found.
4
See J. Roberts to M, 15 July 1884.
5
flower.
6
Ph. Grandif also from New Caledonia interlined annotation by M.
7
see?
8
See also J. Roberts to M, 15 July 1884.
I remain Yours faithfully
James Roberts