Document information
Physical location:
H75/5537, unit 811, VPRS 3991 inward registered correspondence, VA 475 Chief Secretary's Department, Public Record Office, Victoria. 75.05.17aPreferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Robert Ramsay, 1875-05-17 [75.05.17a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/75-05-17a>, accessed May 15, 2025
1
For published copies of this letter see
Argus, 26 May 1875, p. 6 (B75.05.03), and the other sources listed in that entry.
17/5/75
The honorable
Rob. Ramsay, M.L.A. &c &c
Sir
In accordance with your request, just conveyed to me,
I have the honor to report, that the Darnel (phytographically known as Lolium temulentum)
possesses well ascertained poisonous properties, as indeed the specific name implies.
It extends naturally over a great part of Europe and Asia as well as the northern
parts of Africa, where it usually inhabits cornfields. With ill-sifted seedgrains
of cereals it has found its way into Australia, where it is known since very many
years, to occur in a manner similar to its occurrence in Britain. The Darnel-grain
is easily recognized by a comparison of its structure to that of English Ryegrass,
the resemblance in general being considerable, but the Darnel seed being larger than
that of the Ryegrass. These two grasses are furthermore distinguished by the Ryegrass being perennial while the Darnel is annual
or occasionally biennial; moreover the lowest scales of the flowers of the former
are much shorter than the rest taken together, whereas in the Darnel the flower masses
are equalled or even surpassed in length by the lowest flowerscales. The properties
of the Darnelseed are somewhat narcotic, and if this noxious grain is allowed to run
up in quantity on cornfields, and is not removed from the cereal grains finally by
careful sifting, then, as European experience has long since shown, actual poison-cases may occur as well to human beings as to animals
feeding on grain. Even in crushed foddergrains the existence of Darnel can usually
be detected from the fragments of its seeds, which are unlike those of any ordinary
grain used for flour or fodder. I do not think that on all such occasions, when the
Darnel-seeds occur in cereals, submitted to the market, this arises from any willing
or premeditated intention to add by the Darnel to the bulk of the Cereal. This adulteration occurs usually through bad
culture on ill managed fields, subsequent imperfect cleaning of the cereal and oftener
still by the refuse of cornbarns being sold as a cheap fodder, the seller as well
as the purchaser being alike unacquainted, I should think in most or all instances,
of the danger thus incurred.
2
On 5 May 1875 Edward M. Curr, Chief Inspector of Sheep and Stock, forwarded to the Chief Secretary a letter he had received from the veterinary surgeon
Graham Mitchell:
Melbourne
May 5th 1875
E. M. Curr Esq.
Chief Inspector of Stock
Sir
I have the honor to state that there is good reason for believing that numerous deaths
have and are occuring amongst Stock caused by eating injurious plants and seeds, last
year several milch cows died in a manner to arouse suspicioun of poisoning and the
grains supplied to the animals were suspected as the cause, recently I have had cases
brought under my notice in private practice which having been followed up on behalf
of the owners has resulted in finding the seed known as Drake, Darnel, Lolium Temulentum
a recognised poison in quantity, is being accidently or intentionally mixed with grain
and sold for animals food there is also reason to believe that the Darnel is used
for
other purposes
being largely purchased by certain persons.
I would beg to suggest that Baron Von Mueller should be requested to report upon this
poison for the information of the public and by that means probably put a stop to
its being used, and so that it may be recognised as injurious in any form of food
for man or the lower animals, The Colonial seed is much larger and probably stronger
in its effects than the european sample given to me for comparison by Baron Von Mueller[.]
I have the honor to be
Sir
Your Obedient Servant
Graham Mitchell
The Acting Chief Secretary, R. Ramsay, approved the suggestion on 11 May 1875, and
on 14 May W. Odgers, Under Secretary, minuted: 'Referred to Govt. Botanist accordingly
to communicate with Mr Curr.' M replied: 'Received and reported on 17/5/75. Ferd.
von Mueller (at Mt Gellibrand)'.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant
Ferd. von. Mueller.
3
On 19 May 1875 the Under Secretary, W. Odgers, forwarded M's letter to Curr. On 20 May Curr asked: ‘Will Mr Mitchell note & return?’ Mitchell did so on 21 May. A note that the letter had been published was added to the file on 28 May.
Lolium temulentum