Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew Correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1871-81, f. 51. 72.08.10aPreferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1872-08-10 [72.08.10a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/72-08-10a>, accessed September 11, 2025
Melbourne
bot Garden
10/8/72
The Copy of my Defense report,
dear Dr. Hooker, is for your
private
use only, as it has hitherto not yet been published. The good sense of the Legislation
has sheltered me against degradation and ruin. I hope, that I can send you a few words
on the morning of the mail-closure, as to the final decision of the Ministry and Legislative
Assembly in my case.
1
M to C. Duffy, 6 February 1872. Hooker's copy is filed in RBG Kew, Misc. Reports, Melbourne, Mueller, 1853-1896,
ff. 89-105.
2
For the Parliamentary debates see Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, 1872, vol. 14, pp. 919-24 (Assembly, 8 August 1872); pp. 1178-80 (Assembly, 3 September 1872); pp.
1207-14 (Assembly, 4 September 1872); pp. 1450-1 (Council, 24 September 1872). The
conclusion reached was that M's Department be split into three: the Govt. Botanist's
Department, under M and controlling the Botanic Gardens in the narrow sense (78 acres);
The Government House Domain (approx 200 acres) formerly planted and maintained under
M, to be separated and placed under the control of a curator to be appointed; and
a Forests Department, controlled by William Ferguson, who was to oversee a new State
Nursery outside Melbourne, at Macedon. This solution had been proposed by Clement
Hodgkinson, the permanent head of the Department of Crown Lands and Survey. Part of
his report was quoted in the debate: see p. 1179. His full report is in Public Record
Office, Victoria, K72/19018, unit 750, VPRS 44. See also notes to M to J. Casey, 4 September 1872.
Always yours
Ferd. von Mueller