Document information
Physical location:
71.00.00b
Plant names
-
Albiza
Search for
Albiza
in -
Albizza
Search for
Albizza
in
Preferred Citation:
Enrico Giglioli to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1871 [71.00.00b]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/71-00-00b>, accessed June 7, 2025
1
Letter not found. The text given here is from B72.01.01, pp. 8-9. The letter is dated
to 1871 on the basis that that is the latest year that Giglioli could have written
for M's manuscript to be published on 1 January 1872 (note on p. 1 of the volume).
It is introduced by:
Having for several years entertained the view that Albizzia and Pithecolobium ought to be merged into one genus, distinct from the legitimate Acacia only in the concrescence of the stamens, it became necessary to ascertain to which
of the two above generic appellations real priority was due. This question could not
be solved here, where the comparatively scanty material of our young libraries and
museums, however creditable it may be, affords, as yet, for researches of this kind,
but very imperfect aid; and I was thus induced to ask my illustrious friend Dr. Giglioli,
of Florence, the well-known naturalist of the 'Magenta,' to trace out in the Florentine
libraries the precise origin of the genus Albizzia and its first record. Although
surrounded with multifarious literary work, emanating from his travels, he entered,
aided by Dr. Beccari, most obligingly on this task, and the information afforded me
is so complete and important, that I offer it at length in his own words: —.
2
Accademia Reale dei Georgiofili, Florence.
3
M's footnote reads: 'It seems open to grave doubts whether Plukenet's figure really
belongs to Albizzia
Julibrissin, because the drawing shows the leaflets absolutely blunt, without any trace of apiculus;
their nerve is remote from the anterior margin; the leaflets, moreover, are not quite
sessile nor truncate at the base, while flowers and fruits are wanting to support
the identity of the plant.'
The figure in Plukenet (1691), vol. 1, Tab. 1, fig. 4, is of foliage only, with one
magnified leaflet, captioned 'Acaciae ō Spinosa Wagae. Malabar. …'.
4
M reported, p. 8, that Giglioli sent a tracing of the plate accompanying the description.