The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: Bot Garden, 6/9/70 ¶ ¶ I thank you much, dear Dr Hooker, for sending me your new report, ¶ which shows that your huge establishment is assuming still greater dimensions from year to year. The income...

Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, ff. 446-7. 70.09.06a

Plant names

Alsophila Australis
Search for Alsophila Australis in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Alsophila excelsa
Search for Alsophila excelsa in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Leschenaultia
Search for Leschenaultia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Nepenthes Kennedyi
Search for Nepenthes Kennedyi in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Todea
Search for Todea in

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1870-09-06 [70.09.06a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/70-09-06a>, accessed September 11, 2025

Bot Garden, 6/9/70

I thank you much, dear Dr Hooker, for sending me your new report,

J. Hooker (1870a).

which shows that your huge establishment is assuming still greater dimensions from year to year. The income of my whole department is now circumscribed to about £3000 with wages at least double as high as in great Britain; so you may see what a struggle against impossibilities it is. For your sympathies I also express my best thanks.

The difficulties in my Department arose from the invasion of an ordinary gardener on my position, whereby much disorganisation, circumlocution and losses are caused.

Against M's wishes, in December 1869 the Government appointed William Ferguson to superintend the 'practical management' of the Botanic Gardens, simultaneously with his role as Inspector of State Forests; see Cohn & Maroske (1996). This is the first reference in a letter to Hooker to the details of M's difficulties. However, Hooker had been told of Ferguson's appointment much earlier; see G. Thwaites to J. Hooker, 4 March 1870 (in this edition as M70-03-04).

Under these circumstances it would be well to adress all your letters to me with the Designation of Director , which appointment since 1857 I hold under the Governor in council. Usually you omitted the title in the addresses and until these complications arose in my department this omission was of no importance; but now it will be safer and better to designate all your letters on Departmental matters to me as Director.

I am glad you took particular notice of the heavy in your report and trust you will figure it in the Bot. magazine to draw the attention of the horticultural world to such a monster.

J. Hooker (1870a), p. 5. The was illustrated in Botanical Magazine, vol. 98, 1872, t. 5954. In his accompanying comments Joseph Hooker stated that '... after seeing four [huge specimens] exhibited at the St Petersburg Horticultural Exhibition in 1869, I wrote to my friend the Baron, and begged him to procure for us the largest specimen he could, which with his wonted promptitude and liberality, he did at once, so that before the end of that same year, Kew was possessed of the finest specimen in Europe, transmitted moreover free of cost for transport or voyage.' See also J. Hooker to M, 10 September 1869.

The appellation Royal ferns

In his notes on the illustration of the , Hooker wrote ' ... barbara, or as it is ... called [in the Great Temperate House at Kew] (from its affinity to our British Osmunda), the Australian Fern Royal'.

seems scarcely appropriate for such a big square unwieldy thing when at the Black Spur, within half a hundred miles from Melbourne, has been measured fully 80' high! Is that the greatest hight of ferntrees known. I see recorded 60-80' by your lamented father.

Hooker & Baker (1868), p. 40.

Always your

Ferd. von Mueller

For your excellent Students Book I thanked you by last mail.

J. Hooker (1870), see M to J. Hooker, 10 August 1870 (in this edition as 70-08-10a).

I shall use it with advantage. Your elaboration of the species of Nepenthes for D.C.

J. Hooker (1873).

will teach us whether the Australian species, N. Kennedyi (Fragm. V, 154) described by me without flowers & fruits 4 years ago

Described, as N. kennedyana, in B66.02.02, p. 154; see J. Hooker (1873), pp. 98-9.

is really peculiar to the Austr continent. Poor Kennedy first saw it in his doleful expedition 1848.

Beale (1977).

Has Mr Th. Mueller (now in Dresden) repaid the sum, which you so kindly lent him. I have only had a letter from him after he arrived, more than a year ago.

Letter not found. Theodor Mueller was an assistant in M’s botanical museum, see M’s testimonial of 4 May 1869 (in this edition as 69-05-04a).

No s exist within a thousand miles of Melbourne and the really pretty species are only in W. Austr.

No surviving letter from J. Hooker to M in 1870 mentions .