The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: 14/8/69 ¶ ¶ Would you oblige me, dear Dr Hooker, to see among my normal set of Ficus Species, whether Dr Beckler describes the one from the Hastings River as ever producing ¶ many ¶ adventitious ro...

Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, ff. 400, 412. 69.08.14c

Plant names

Aconitum
Search for Aconitum in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Areca sapida
Search for Areca sapida in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Butomus umbellatus
Search for Butomus umbellatus in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Caltha palustris
Search for Caltha palustris in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eriophorum
Search for Eriophorum in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Ficus Beckleri
Search for Ficus Beckleri in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Ficus Indica
Search for Ficus Indica in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Ficus Muelleri
Search for Ficus Muelleri in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Ficus prolixa
Search for Ficus prolixa in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Kentia
Search for Kentia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Podophyllum peltatum
Search for Podophyllum peltatum in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Sagittaria sagittifolia
Search for Sagittaria sagittifolia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Todea
Search for Todea in
Veratrum Album
Search for Veratrum Album in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Veratrum viride
Search for Veratrum viride in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to Joseph Hooker, 1869-08-14 [69.08.14c]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/69-08-14c>, accessed September 11, 2025

MS annotation: 'Sent Oct [1]9/69'.

14/8/69

Would you oblige me, dear Dr Hooker, to see among my normal set of Ficus Species, whether Dr Beckler describes the one from the Hastings River as ever producing many adventitious roots connected into stout columns. Among the plants from Lord Howe’s Island is a magnificent species of Ficus which rivals & F. prolixa in the development of masses of columns and the interjacent arches of domes. Mr Moore & Mr Carron never saw many columnar roots or stems on the species of the Hastings; still Lord Howe’s Island has a wonderfully mild & humid clime and a rich basalt soil, both of which may induce a far more copious growth of columns than the clime & soil of the Hastings.

I have only one leaf and one fruit of this Ficus. So I cannot send it. Pray examine Dr Becklers labels or return them to me, if you cannot make out his somewhat curious writing. I should also be glad for a leaf and fruit back (in a letter) from F. Beckleri & F. Muelleri

There are also 4 palms on the island, which seem all to belong like the 8 New Caledonians to , with which Miquel & Blume unite the New Zealand . Possibly is only a section of Areca. I shall investigate the matter as far as my material admits.

M discussed the palms in B70.04.01, pp 99-104, having examined the generic position when he transferred monostachya from Areca, pp. 82-83.

In December Mr Moore and myself are to have an other lot of plants from Lord Howe's Island, when we will be able to supply Kew well.

Always your

Ferd von Mueller.

The following text is filed at f. 412. It has been placed here because of the annotation on f. 400, which seems to apply to some of the items mentioned in this paragraph rather than to those mentioned in the main body of the letter. M to J. Hooker, 29 January 1870 reports that some items from the list on f. 412 had arrived on the clipper George Thompson (which sailed from London on 25 October 1869; see Argus, 12 January 1870, p. 4), but does not mention the arrival of any of the items requested on f. 400.

Would you believe that in the 30 years of Victorian colonisation never yet a single plant of any Aconit

was raised or improved! Indeed I believe the plants of this genus are after 80 years not in Australia. I have sown them dozens of times & could never raise them! Would it not be well to trust into some case a strong root, also then , , V. viride, , Butomus [umbellatus], , . — None of these are in Australia. Pray, dear Dr Hooker, deem me not immodest, but I want them much for my medicinal division in the garden & also for the garden lake. I will send you several s, which you can utilise for interchanges.